Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Keenan
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 1257 next>>
Nov 22, 2018 14:14:47   #
idaholover wrote:
If he is as astute as our new rep the Cortez gal in civics, he won't k now s**t.


Spud, if you having nothing to do with your time today, perhaps you should consider volunteering at a local food pantry, serving thanksgiving dinner to the poor to make you feel relevant? Just a suggestion.

You're welcome.
Go to
Nov 22, 2018 14:13:06   #
Bazbo wrote:
You might try corroborating this with a non-partisan source.


Wingers don't need to corroborate their silly beliefs with non-partisan sources. Their partisan sources provide them with all of the baseless opinionated dogma they would ever need.
Go to
Nov 22, 2018 14:09:30   #
Frank T wrote:
Wow, It must be true. I saw it on the internet. Said no one, ever.


It's called, "Truth By Way of Youtube Video Titles."

It's the wingers' most prestigious peer-reviewed science journal.
Go to
Nov 22, 2018 14:03:59   #
EyeSawYou wrote:
Ummm...it is YOU that is running from the question I posed you. Lol learn how to read.

Keenan wrote:
Wow. So on the most controversial and outrageous a... (show quote)


You do know that an assailant who murders a pregnant woman can by charged with double murder at ANY stage of pregnancy right? Is this proposed law any different?


Keep running, Rac.
Go to
Nov 22, 2018 14:02:47   #
idaholover wrote:
It's pretty obvious from the amount of time you have spent here today in a demented state of mind you have no friends or family to enjoy the holiday with. Might I suggest the local Mission. Keep in mind I have you in my prayers.


Yes, RacEyeSore really needs to get a new hobby. We've been trying to encourage him to do that since his 13000th "No Really, Intelligent Design is Real Science" thread a few years ago.
Go to
Nov 22, 2018 13:56:46   #
Elaine2025 wrote:
It it is the reality of it.


It is in your parallel universe of alternate facts, perhaps.
Go to
Nov 22, 2018 13:55:16   #
letmedance wrote:
What should be the cost of protecting the borders, can you put a dollar figure on it?


What does protecting our border have to do with election stunts?
Go to
Nov 22, 2018 13:54:23   #
DaveO wrote:
I guess I was confused how the deployment money is contributing to re-equipping. BTW, it is a moot point that the cost of these deployed troops is not the same as if they were working and training at their home duty stations, so don't think that the salary is the only consideration. Again, to try and lessen the reported expenditures by attempting to separate all troops involved in the cumulative effort is less than forthright.
I guess I was confused how the deployment money is... (show quote)


"Again, to try and lessen the reported expenditures by attempting to separate all troops involved in the cumulative effort is less than forthright. "

True, but that's the only way he knows how to argue.
Go to
Nov 22, 2018 13:48:48   #
letmedance wrote:
Did we all forget 911. Did Bush or Obama impose sanctions or take other actions when Saudi Arabia citizens killed 3000 Americans on our soil.


You don't remember? We did more than impose sanctions. We leveled 2 whole countries for the 9/11 attacks.
Go to
Nov 22, 2018 13:40:19   #
EyeSawYou wrote:
I see you are once again making assumptions out of thin air, where did I say I was an "enthusiastic" supporter of this proposed law? I see you refused to address the fact that an assailant who murders a pregnant woman can by charged with double murder at ANY stage of pregnancy, why?


I see you keep running away from the question on the floor, and want to talk about a different question instead. fascinating.
Go to
Nov 22, 2018 13:25:25   #
Rose42 wrote:
You don't have a commitment to truth and science as you consistently demonstrate otherwise. You simply ignore what you don't want to be true. lol




Sure, Rose. Oh, speaking of honesty, did you locate the section in that document yet for your claim that regulations stopped people in Tahoe from raking their pine needles? Or was that another lie that you told that you are too dishonest to admit to?
Go to
Nov 22, 2018 13:12:19   #
EyeSawYou wrote:
You do know that an assailant who murders a pregnant woman can by charged with double murder at ANY stage of pregnancy right? Is this proposed law any different?


So I take it you are an enthusiastic supporter of giving the death penalty to women who have abortions. Got it. Not the least bit surprised, Rac.

What would be your preferred method? A public hanging or cutting her head off surrounded by angry mobs, like they do in Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan?
Go to
Nov 22, 2018 13:08:47   #
Bazbo wrote:
In my market, Hannity and Maddow are on at the same time. Sometimes I flip back and forth between the two competing "A blocks" just to gauge the disparate, but parallel universes the respective audiences live it.

Concepts like "truth" and "fact" have lost all meaning.


At least on the Fux News side they have lost all meaning. I haven't found that to be the case with Maddow. From a fact checking standpoint, there really is no comparison between Hannity and Maddow.
Go to
Nov 22, 2018 13:07:43   #
letmedance wrote:
My point exactly. For my buddy Keenan, I do not find arguing about the death penalty worth my time as such an extreme bill if passed will be struck down by the courts.


Yea, the fact that the American Taliban GOP believes so fervently in putting women to death who are raped and get an abortion...that they actually are genuinely attempting to make it the law of the land with a straight face...is a subject so uninteresting and immaterial...that it isn't even worth anybody's time to discuss...




What's most instructive is how people react to this question. And the fact that their reactions to the question being placed before them is often more revealing than had they just given a simple answer. Working themselves into a tizzy to pretend that they didn't even see the question, getting angry or offended that the question was even asked, calling it "a stupid question"...all these fascinating reactions by right wingers here who are so uncomfortable with the question, has been quite instructive.
Go to
Nov 22, 2018 06:24:04   #
Architect1776 wrote:
It is absolutely a true story.
Libs just can't handle the truth.
So if they can't refute the TRUTH the attack the source and messenger.
How typical of those devoid of original thought.
It is absolutely a true story. br Libs just can't ... (show quote)


Riiiight. Just like the racist Obama birther conspiracy purveyed by Jerome Corsi the founder of WingNutDaily was "true."

So, what other news sources to you consider legitimate? Alex Jones InfoWars? BreitShit?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 1257 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.