- Nothing in that article mentions the party of the people involved. And most of the people arrested for voter fraud have been Trump supporters.

- But, I'll allow that they probably were Democrats, because it's important to note they are merely accused of making it easier for people to vote (or, more accurately, violating a law that was specifically designed to make it difficult for some people to vote). There was NO accusation that the votes themselves were fraudulent or altered.

No. It was out of control a year ago. The "year over Year" rate is about 8%. But the month-over month rates for July, August and September were 0.1%, 0.0%, & 0.4% respectively --- 0.5% for the quarter, or a perfectly normal 2% annualized.

It's worthwhile to note that inflation is still out of control in the various European countries (England, Italy, Hungry, et al) where they continue with a populist right-wing leader, and is only going down in the US, where we threw out our populist right-wing leader and replaced him with a progressive Democrat.

Of course, and I never said otherwise.

On your original message, to which I responded, you said just "a plan to ban the use of gas". Which anyone would take to mean gasoline.

Of course, you later edited your message to stick in the word "fossil" so that you'd have something to accuse me of.

Which just proves my point.... if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have nothing to say.

Exactly, we only hear about the U3 when a Democrat is in the White House. Conservatives are fine with the U3 when a Republican is President.

For the last 40+ years, regardless of who's president, the U6 has always been very close to twice the U3. So, you don't need to report it. Just take the U3 and double it.

Note that the U6 was 12% the day Joe Biden took over. It's down to 6.4% now.

um... You are aware that gasoline and natural gas are two entirely different things, right?

(If Republicans weren't spreading lies, they'd have nothing to say....)

Rough? no.. Annoying? Yeah.

It'll be like the Clinton email investigation: Lot's a time and (taxpayer) money wasted on a lot of grandstanding by Republicans, and no crimes found --- because everyone knew all along there was NOTHING to find.

I'm willing to believe that those are actual videos of Biden (performing embarrassing but not illegal actions), but you have to wonder why he'd put them on his business laptop. But they are exacting what you'd put on a laptop if you wanted to smear someone. (They sucked you in....)

Yes, I've heard about that.

It was given to the blind store owner who obviously can't identify the person who gave him the laptop, nor can he assure that the receipt was actually signed by that person. The Russian operative could have merely taken the receipt, scrawled something on it, and then handed back to him a prepared receipt with Hunter's forged signature.

Or, the operative could have just scrawled something on the receipt and handed it back to him. As this comparison of the receipt to a known Hunter signature, they look nothing alike:

You are quite gullible (But then, you're a conservative, so that's a given).

If this was done by a democrat trying to promote a candidate, there would be dozen of signs for one person.

But here we have just three signs, exactly one each for three different Democrats.

This was done by someone who intentionally wanted to make the Democrats look bad.

When they find the person who did this, I can assure you, he'll be a Trumper.

Well, clearly you CAN make this stuff up.....

It cannot be proven that this was ever Hunter Biden's laptop.

But, it CAN be proven that this was in the hands of Russian operatives before it came to public attention.

Many experts in Russian intelligence have stated that this is EXACTLY as the KGB runs its smear operations.

As evidence in a trial, it is COMPLETELY worthless.

But that's post-presidency --- marketing their name, not selling favors of the office.

That's never stopped me from claiming it.

Did you actually bother reading that article? The map was supposed to be drawn fairly by a bi-partisan committee, but the REPUBLICANS torpedoed it.

That article is a lot of hooey....

The first clue was that the headline was "Vaccines Never Prevented the Transmission of COVID", but yet it took SIX paragraphs before it ever said a word on that topic.

The next clue is the rather vague references to materials that they say support their claims:

- What studies?? Why no citations? Are they afraid people will read the actual study and realize how they are misrepresented here?

- "that the vaccines did not prevent infection". Well, not 100%. But it did drop infection by over 90% -- and deaths by over 99%, so that still sounds pretty good.

- "natural immunity was at least as protective". I'm still baffled by the right's obsession with "natural immunity". The best way to avoid getting Covid is to have already gotten Covid?? You do see the proble with that, right?

And this is just of people who got Covid despite being vaccinated. The chances of a person who did not get it at all (due to the vaccine) of spreading it are near zero.