Posts for: Blenheim Orange
Feb 26, 2024 21:13:22 #
Feb 26, 2024 21:11:39 #
Feb 26, 2024 20:28:24 #
terryMc wrote:
Of course you do.
Explain it to me, then, if you would please.
Feb 26, 2024 18:38:44 #
Affinity Photo isn't a parametric editor, is it?
There is a good discussion about the shortcomings of Affinity Photo for working with raw files here:
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4429854?page=5
There is a good discussion about the shortcomings of Affinity Photo for working with raw files here:
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4429854?page=5
Feb 26, 2024 18:26:43 #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
As I see it trying settings and not achieving the desired results is also a learning experience.
Exactly.
I guess that way back when I was a teen I was interested to see the settings accompanying images in the magazines, but that didn't keep me from learning the basics and I never thought that the key to success was copying someone else's settings.
I suspect that at least some who are arguing against settings being published don't use settings at all, they just let the camera make those decisions.
Feb 26, 2024 17:06:11 #
Linda From Maine wrote:
It's a quarterly topic. You just haven't been around enough the past few years, Mike.
Do you mean to say that I need to spend more time here??
Tell me if I am understanding the point people are making about this issue. If the settings used for taking an image are included with an image, people who are new to photography will copy those settings and they will do that rather than learning the basics of photography.
Is that the only problem people have with camera settings being published along with an image?
Feb 26, 2024 14:11:19 #
Rongnongno wrote:
Funny, check where it is now.
Of course. Someone complained.
Feb 25, 2024 23:27:59 #
Feb 25, 2024 19:01:58 #
Thaks to luvmypets, NMGal, Mark Romoff, Curmudgeon, jerryc41, yssirk123, Bruce T, tcthome, jederick, Gampa, W9OD, ORpilot, kpmac, Earnest Botello, Wingpilot, Bridges, John Matthew. Much appreciated.
Feb 25, 2024 18:59:34 #
Vladimir200 wrote:
I agree................
I am surprised by the responses. I would not have expected this to be controversial.
Feb 25, 2024 18:15:38 #
Longshadow wrote:
They are examples for the discussion.
They are examples for the discussion.
Correct.
Feb 25, 2024 18:13:06 #
OldCADuser wrote:
Yes, my freshman year at 'da Tech', Tony Esposito, of future NHL fame, was a senior and our team's goalie. That's when they were still playing in an unheated stadium and it only cost students a buck to attend a game (and we still found ways to sneak in for free).
Anyway, below is a sampling of our visits to Tahquamenon Falls:
Anyway, below is a sampling of our visits to Tahquamenon Falls:
Wonderful. Thanks!
Feb 25, 2024 17:19:22 #
clansman wrote:
Apologies, these were for explanation, not as a general gallery content, and I thought it best to continue in the same chapter for the sake of continuity as to results achieved. My mistake, apologies.
There is nothing wrong with your post. We have some overly zealous hall monitors.
Feb 25, 2024 17:18:13 #
Rongnongno wrote:
Gallery.... AGAIN!
It isn't a gallery post.
Feb 25, 2024 15:31:13 #
Warhorse wrote:
Great shot!
Looks like you found a higher location to shoot from, than the stairs/viewing platform.
Looks like you found a higher location to shoot from, than the stairs/viewing platform.
Thanks. You are exactly right.