Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: MMC
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 280 next>>
Dec 5, 2018 12:00:33   #
joehel2 wrote:
Yes, great job removing the wires and overall processing.


Thanks.
Go to
Dec 5, 2018 11:59:52   #
IDguy wrote:
The post processing is exactly what I was thinking...until I scrolled down. Nice job!

(PS: I know the effort needed to remove the wire jumble.)


Thanks.
Go to
Dec 5, 2018 11:34:15   #
I have found this picture in my archive which I took 5 years ago in Russian capital Moskow and decided to improve it. I used Photoshop and Luminar. C&C please.

Before PP.

(Download)

After PP.

(Download)
Go to
Dec 5, 2018 09:02:41   #
Dwolfe1941 wrote:
I too like Luminar, however, I have a tough time getting the photo out of Luminar in Jpeg format so I can use the finished product. Does anybody have a good procedure for transferring the photos in and out of Luminar?


For transferring in on the 1-st screen of Luminar Open image and do whatever you want, to transfer out to transfer it out File, Export and choose format and folder.
Go to
Dec 5, 2018 08:15:47   #
seco66 wrote:
I've been reading many positive reviews of this editing program so I thought I'd give it a try. I've always liked this photo but was never quite satisfied with my attempts of its editing. For a hack like me, it's a very reliable and pleasing program to use :)


Very nice picture. Can you show it before PP and tell what you did in PP?
Go to
Nov 30, 2018 22:35:35   #
lamiaceae wrote:
Great! But OK, how did you do it?


Go to
Nov 27, 2018 13:28:03   #
Jim-Pops wrote:
About the same.


Thanks for your reply. Next time I will try using all 3 methods. BTW what software are you using for stacking?
Go to
Nov 27, 2018 12:57:17   #
Jim-Pops wrote:
I like to use stacking and do it quite often. In this shot because of the moving water I would not want to stack because of the way the water has an Un-natural look about it. Was your intent to have a different, possibly a smooth water look? As for sharpening I always do it after the stacking was competed. Because of different settings per photo sharpening I don't think the software knows exactly what to do.

I took your picture and used a simple correction using Photolemur 3 software. Then in Photoshop I made two sharpening layers using High Pass filter. One just for the foreground greenery and a second stronger setting for the remaining picture. This didn't do anything to change the water ripple effect. I don't think this is the look you were going for but please let me know.

Going back to the main reason for my reply is I don't suggest doing anything to the original pictures before the stacking is completed and merged.
I like to use stacking and do it quite often. In t... (show quote)


Thank you for looking and your comments, It is seems to me that water in my pictures does not look smooth. I was using Helicon Focus and this achievement of this software. I tried sharpening stacked frames after stacking and sharpening each frame before stacking and the second result looks better for me. Today I tried to sharpen this result one more time with High pass filter. What is your opinion. Is it better or worse?


(Download)
Go to
Nov 22, 2018 19:27:00   #
Happy Thanksgiving.


(Download)
Go to
Nov 19, 2018 15:00:08   #
R.G. wrote:
You seem to be doing (adding?) something that brings out the swirls in the water. If that's the main subject that you were trying to capture then you've succeeded. Light-wise it still looks like it could do with more contrast. Also, there was a slight green tint in the first edit and you seem to have done something to aggravate it in this edit. I gave the Tint slider a nudge to the right to neutralise that.


Thanks again. I moved Tint slider to =10. Is it better now?


(Download)
Go to
Nov 19, 2018 12:32:00   #
R.G. wrote:
Different parts of the image were responding differently so after some global adjustments I resorted to selections. The final amount of vividness is a matter of taste. The image is brighter overall but the shadows are only moderately brighter. And much of the haze in the original has been dealt with. I originally had it brighter but when comparing it to the original I decided to drop the brightness a bit. When I ramped up the contrast the whites needed much more subduing than the blacks.

-
Different parts of the image were responding diffe... (show quote)


Thank you for your time and attempt to improve my picture. I made one more rendition. What is your opinion about this variant?


(Download)
Go to
Nov 18, 2018 12:07:08   #
dsturr wrote:
In the first picture, some of the rocks starting from the bottom left are out of focus; in the second picture everything is in focus. Perhaps one shot was left out of the stack.


Thank you for looking and your comments. I do not think so. 3-rd pictures in this post is my 1-st picture in the stock with sharpest foreground /which is a little bit soft/. When I stocked the same pictures 2 years ago I did not sharpen this pictures before stacking. Yesterday I sharpened pictures in photoshop before stacking. It is better sharpen pictures before stacking then after.IMHO.
Go to
Nov 18, 2018 06:57:38   #
R.G. wrote:
It looks like your main adjustment was to lift the shadows, which has worked in the sense that more detail is now visible. However, to my eye the image is now lacking contrast, and the brightening seems to have introduced a greenish tint to the rocks and water. It also seems to have lost some of its naturalness. It's natural for rocks in rivers to have dark bits.

I'm left wondering if it needed as much brightening of the shadows as you've given it. If you think that it did need all of it, you could try adding more contrast, and if that re-introduces too much darkness to the dark end you could try lifting the blacks instead of the shadows. In more general terms you should be able to add a significant amount of contrast if you work the blacks and whites to mitigate the extreme effects of the added contrast. And if you do add more contrast you may find that the saturation levels of some of the individual colours need to be reduced slightly.
It looks like your main adjustment was to lift the... (show quote)


Thanks for looking and your comments. I decided to post 1-st shot from this stock converted from RAW file without any correction. You can try to adjust it using Camera Raw filter and show me your result.


(Download)
Go to
Nov 17, 2018 19:53:17   #
NotAnselAdams wrote:
Yes, please


I am sorry if you do not like my result.


(Download)
Go to
Nov 17, 2018 19:40:48   #
NotAnselAdams wrote:
Thank you for your input. I am still figuring out how to use "edit" with my Apple photo's to the best effect. I also have "Lightroom" to work out. I am of the yellow lined tablet and #2 pencil generation so I've some work to do. I'll check out the relationship between white balance and how it effects my pictures. Thanks much. Not Ansel


Would you like me to show my result after color correction of your picture?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 280 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.