GTinSoCal wrote:
Wow, Craig, that's a loaded question.
I almost always try the NR in ACR to see if it will make do what I want it to do.
A lot of the time, it works fine and I'm done. Sometimes it is just a start, others it softens more than it reduces noise (not often though).
When I need additional NR once I'm in PS, I will often try the NR first, to see which direction I'm going to go. I take a snapshot of that (or them), then proceed to do whatever I wanted to do on the image. After I get it the way I think I want it, I'll then use whichever NR technique I previously thought would work the best.
Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't.
If it doesn't, I'll try one of the other techniques.
Then save the PSD, and finish for whatever output I'm looking for saved as a JPEG.
I hope I made sense :-)
I'm guilty of reading LONG exposure NR into this thread :oops:
I'm guessing that's because High ISO and long exposures go hand in hand for me.
It's not that often I need to crank my ISO for anything but astro photography.
I going to try the high ISO NR on the next new moon :-D
GT
Wow, Craig, that's a loaded question. br br I alm... (
show quote)
Thank you very much that's exactly the answer to the process I wanted. As you know Astrophotography is what I am really trying to get into.
And this Thread is all about NR. I do OK with terrestrial shots.
When you use high ISO NR that's going to leave you with JPEGs in Camera right???
From what I've read here High ISO NR would be good for what we like to shoot, for the Hot Spots, in long exposures & black backgrounds?