Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: canadaboy
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12 next>>
Dec 2, 2018 07:35:38   #
As an advertising or promotional type shot what you have works well. For an interesting still life you would probably be looking at a bottle of beer a glass of beer with froth and maybe spectacles and a book or newspaper. All very hum drum but with the right lighting this sort of thing can work well. Seems to me that some can master the art of arranging items to look good and others like me end up with totally boring pictures. Good luck in your search and I sincerely hope you develop more skills than I have ever managed when I tried it.
Go to
Dec 2, 2018 06:22:17   #
Nice set Grist Mill is quite superb
Go to
Dec 2, 2018 02:55:47   #
RichardTaylor wrote:
There have been recent threads and posts about landscapes and how easy and/or difficult they are to shoot.

For myself the main ingredient is time:
Time to scout locations.
Time to be on site and ready to shoot at the right time.
Time to understand light - Extremly important
Time to be totally familiar with your camera and know how to get the "correct" exposure. Know how your camera metering sytem works and how to read a histogram.
Time to post process your images.

As far as gear goes almost any camera will be ok. Depending on the lighting conditions, you may need a tripod and a remote release, filters for the lens (ND, ND gard, polariser) and if shooting in the dark a torch will be very handy. If the weather is "bad" (which can be good) wet weather gear for you and your camera.

Here a two examples shot in the city where we live (Sydney, Australia)

#1 Mid winter around 11am. Booring blue skies. We, my wife and I, were on one of our walks exploring the city. A very easy hand held exposure. I feel a bit "detached" as there is no real foreground.

#2 Again in wintertime (late july). Late afternoon 5:39PM looking west A tripod and a remote release was used along with a stop ND grad filter on the lens to control the sky. 6 second exposure. Image was slightly warmed up when post processing the original raw file. I was by myself so I had plenty, relatively speaking, of time to work.

More to come and feel free to contribute and/or ask questions.
.
There have been recent threads and posts about lan... (show quote)


Not sure what point your trying to make with No 1. I think you would agree its just a snapshot.
No 2 to my eyes looks wildly overworked but if the result is what you wanted when you took the shot then we may have to disagree about what part realism plays in landscape photography.
Would love to see the SOOC edition of No 2 to better understand your reason for the end result.
Go to
Dec 2, 2018 02:41:24   #
Change the buildings for 19th century cotton mills and you have a scene LS Lowry could have painted. Color palette is similar as well.
Go to
Dec 1, 2018 04:11:27   #
Admin folks Please remove double posts for me. Got twitchy finger syndrome when using mouse
Go to
Dec 1, 2018 04:09:43   #
Double Post
Go to
Dec 1, 2018 04:06:27   #
Looks worthy enough to be posted anywhere to me. Guy called ArtBob hangs out in another forum I'm sure could offer advice on the aesthetics of this image.
Go to
Dec 1, 2018 04:06:27   #
Double Post
Go to
Dec 1, 2018 04:06:26   #
Double Post
Go to
Dec 1, 2018 03:53:53   #
Natalie Knott wrote:
Wow, emotionally impacting, thank you!


Yep Natalie I had to lie down when I saw it I was so impacted!

Very nice capture indeed.
Go to
Dec 1, 2018 03:46:19   #
Strodav wrote:
Nice work and I will look at the Soft Light Blend mode. BTW the original was in raw. My mistake was letting LR Classic CC convert it to jpg for the original post.


Double Post
Go to
Dec 1, 2018 03:38:23   #
Strodav wrote:
Nice work and I will look at the Soft Light Blend mode. BTW the original was in raw. My mistake was letting LR Classic CC convert it to jpg for the original post.


I would say the mistake was using LR for anything other than cataloging. It has no layers no blend modes no access to channels etc etc. Whether Raw or Jpegs open in Camera Raw and use the tools available before going into Photoshop to perform the finale. PS is not so user friendly but once you master it you will not look back.
Go to
Nov 30, 2018 05:25:19   #
Opened in Camera Raw and adjusted then into Photoshop and Soft Light blend mode at 14%. Loads more can be done but this was quick and dirty adjustment. Jpegs will open in Camera Raw but different method for different versions of PS. Google is your friend here.


(Download)
Go to
Nov 30, 2018 04:55:36   #
Double Exposure


(Download)
Go to
Nov 29, 2018 02:21:06   #
sxrich wrote:
For me, it can or may emphasize emotion, mood more. Black and white is a good choice when the color in a photo serves only as a distraction from the message you want the image to convey. I like B&W very much. I'm also in my 60's so nostalgia may have impact on me personally. Look at the works of Ansel Adams and his zone system. Here is an image of a 2 hr. old baby with mother. Here's a gal I shot last week, one color and one B&W. What I also like, in lightroom, is that I can play with the hue of colors and have it totally change the look of a B&W image. So, why don't you give us your opinion? Do younger photographers have a different opinion than older (I know it's somewhat relative)?
For me, it can or may emphasize emotion, mood more... (show quote)


Does LR have a filter for getting rid of the shiny skin in your BW effort?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.