RichardTaylor wrote:
There have been recent threads and posts about landscapes and how easy and/or difficult they are to shoot.
For myself the main ingredient is time:
Time to scout locations.
Time to be on site and ready to shoot at the right time.
Time to understand light - Extremly important
Time to be totally familiar with your camera and know how to get the "correct" exposure. Know how your camera metering sytem works and how to read a histogram.
Time to post process your images.
As far as gear goes almost any camera will be ok. Depending on the lighting conditions, you may need a tripod and a remote release, filters for the lens (ND, ND gard, polariser) and if shooting in the dark a torch will be very handy. If the weather is "bad" (which can be good) wet weather gear for you and your camera.
Here a two examples shot in the city where we live (Sydney, Australia)
#1 Mid winter around 11am. Booring blue skies. We, my wife and I, were on one of our walks exploring the city. A very easy hand held exposure. I feel a bit "detached" as there is no real foreground.
#2 Again in wintertime (late july). Late afternoon 5:39PM looking west A tripod and a remote release was used along with a stop ND grad filter on the lens to control the sky. 6 second exposure. Image was slightly warmed up when post processing the original raw file. I was by myself so I had plenty, relatively speaking, of time to work.
More to come and feel free to contribute and/or ask questions.
.
There have been recent threads and posts about lan... (
show quote)
Not sure what point your trying to make with No 1. I think you would agree its just a snapshot.
No 2 to my eyes looks wildly overworked but if the result is what you wanted when you took the shot then we may have to disagree about what part realism plays in landscape photography.
Would love to see the SOOC edition of No 2 to better understand your reason for the end result.