Reminds me of the fellow that was sent to prison
While in side his cell, he ask the other prisoner
what do they do to pass the time away. The prisoner
said that many of the inmates have been it prision
so long, that all they had left was to tell jokes.
A little while pass by, then someone in another
cell called out "42", then ever one on the cell block
busted out laughing. After the laughter, died down
some one else called out "57" again every one busted
out laughing.
So what confused, the new inmate ask the out prisoner,
just what was going on, so he told him ,like he say
before many of the prisoners have been in prison a long
time and they have heard the same jokes over and over,
and ever one knew them by heart, so instead of telling
the same jokes all over,each joke was given a number.
After about one hour of siliance, the new fellow decided
he was going to try his luck. He lean close to the bars
and yelled "21". To his amazement no one laugh, so he
yelled out even loughter "21" still no laughter. Some
what disappointed he inquired and ask the other prisoner
as to why no one in their cells weren't laughing, the
other prisoner told him."Kid you just don't know how
to tell a JOKE"

I know,I was in the same store looking for a
AR15, while I was checking it out, I was looking
through its site, when the lady behind the counter
said" please keep the butts down on the floor" when
I turn around, all the seniors in the store were
sitting down.

Obama is always looking for ways to save money
(ya right ) why doesn't he look into this as a way.
We can do as the liberials on the far left wants to do,
which is making picture " A" the path to US Citizenship.
OR we can use picture " B " the Conservative way .
Either way we the taxpayers saves money. If we do it
the Liberial way we want need any one attending the
boader gates, if we do it the Conservative way, we
will only need an electric fence, instead of one with
holes in it.

Picture " A "


Picture " B "

I would hate to leave a difficult part unanswer, so Ill
try to put it so that even you will know who decides
what's legal and illegal. In mu own opion, I'd say it's
the same ones who said that our young men and
women has the rights to fight for our country once
their 18 years of age which they say is legal, but then
the same men and women can not smoke or dring
any alcohol until their 21 because they say it would be
illegal, the same ones who passes laws through
Congress for the American people to obey, while on the
other hand, they attach a provision that exempts them
from following the same laws.
Now let me ask you a question, this may be to hard for
you to answer, so I'll give you what ever time you need.
Question:
What is the reason we as tax payers are paying our
men and women along our US boaders to resk theirs
lives for.
A) To protect our boaders from illegal immigrant from
Mexco crossing our boader and entering here illegally
or
B) To prevent our undocument or New Americans from
leaving the US and returning back to Mexco
I, as an legal American chose (A)

Webster's Dictionary: Illegal, prohibited by law,n. one
who inters the country illegally. Look it up.

According to our faithful goverment there should be
some where's around 11,000,000 ( give or take )
illegal immigrants, but if they use the same formula
that they use to figure out our national dept, I'd say
their off by about + 10,000,000.
Besides what different does it makes, if it's 100 or
11,000,000 plus, if their here illegally their here ILLEGALLY
why shouldn't or can't we refer to them as ILLEGALS.
FOR some on the Left I took the time to look up
the diffinition of ILLEGAL as Webster Dictionary ( know
many on the left would like to remove such words
from Mr. WEBSTERs book along with many other words
such a Terrorism, Honor and Pride just to name a few.
But here is what MR. WEBSTER says.

ILLEGAL

Jonn Conyers:DEM:
Please don't use the term "Illegal Immigrants"
say Out of status or New Americans" . What
part of illegal doesn't he get. May be we need
more of them in Congress to replace him. Illegal
immegrants that is. If owning an auto matic weapon
should be called illegal, why in the heck can't illegal
immigrants be called illegal as well?

Just thinking,I recall a wise man ( By some that is )
as saying " I smoke pot, in my younger days, but I
didn't inhale any smoke. Now looking at the picture
of the child holding the auto-matic weapon, does
any one know for sure if the weapon was loaded,
was there a round in the chamber or did the child
even shoot the weapon.
He may have been given the weapon, just to see
how it feels and to get a better idea of what's it
like holding something that size. As far as the ear
plugs and safety glasses that should be worn
reguardless any time your on the fireing range.

If I would be on the left , I guess it would be ok if
he would be holding a BUD LITE instead, but that's
ok one day he may be protecting your rights to hold
that bud, because you'll be to afraid to hold the rifle
he's now learning how to shoot.
It appears he's on a fireing range, I think this would be
a better place for him to learn, then on the street, by
some drug lord, don't you think ? Just Asking.

After reading this post for the last few days, I've
knowest there are a few replies that states they
would not have taken a sick person to the firing range.
I agree with the rest of those who say, Im sure, if
either of the victims would have felt that their lives
would have been in any danger, that they would have taken
a different apporch.
I am a Viet Nam veteran and I own guns and rifes, does
that make me more of a danger to other civilians, be-
cause I'm a veteran. The guy was sick he needed help,
his friends were knoen to have help others, not bring
him to the range, how many parents are shot by their
own children, in their own home, what would you say,
don't bring your child in to the home, because he or
she may have a mental break down with out them knowing
it's coming.I know this want mean much to does who
haven't served in the military, but if I tough for
any reason I could give my life, inorder to save some
one else's,I'd be willing to do it in a heart beat.
Many veterans have and own guns, many of them goes
hunting ever year with other of their veteran friends
and I'd be willing to say, never once have they ever
given a tough of them ever being shot by one of them.

Who's hands were the blood of the massacre at Fort Hood
on, the Military. Or did you forget about them ? Would a
back ground check have help them any? Don't be shy, any
liberial can reply.

No one on the Liberial side will reply, to many would rather
give up our rights to own guns, than give up thier rights
of drinking and driving.

May-be he should have taken him to the Military Shrink
at Fort Hood, Oh I for got, he's still in jail pending a
muder rape, WE'RE still waiting on his trail to come up,
aren't we. I could just about imagine how much help HE
was to our returning troups.
How come we don't hear much from the Left Liberials
about this guy when it comes to gun controls.

I was just wondering when was the last time ,if any,
has anyone ever heard a Doctor say, he or she was
ever doing a cesarean on a woman in order to deliver
a fetus. Or that the fetus's head was in the wrong pos-
sition that the fetus may have to be delievered by a
cesaren section.
Also i would like to know, if a breach birth is the hardest
delievery for a woman to deliever a child, why is it the
the Liberials were so eagar to follow Bill Cliton's partical
birth abortion plan. Remember the one where a child body
was turned around inorder to dliever the child feet first,
inorder for the childs brain had to be distroyed.
Never could figure it out, that after the child's body was
delievered and the only thing that was harmful to it's
mother's life or health was its head( remember the rest
of the body had done be removed and it's mother was
still in good health and her life still in no danger) could
some one please tell me ,just what part of the baby's
head could have pose any danger to his or her mother.

Would that in clued the 45,000,000 plus abortion preformed.
You did say, the taking of some one's life, reguardless of the
circumstances, didnt you? Just asking