Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Posts for: Alafoto
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 376 next>>
Feb 4, 2024 19:21:54   #
dbrugger25 wrote:
I nthe 1950s my father bought a Rolleiflex 2.8D which he really couldn't afford. I really liked photography and he was kind enough (and foolish enough) to let me use it for high school sports photography.

I was on the sidelines at a basketball game when the viewing hood of the Rollei got smacked by a very fast moving basketball. It was destroyed. I was terrified to take his precious, now broken camera home where dad would see it.

Fortunately, there was an old-time camera repair shop in Erie, PA and I took it there to find what could be done in a hurry. As luck would have it the man, Doug Johnston, the owner, had a hood. He had upgraded the hood of another Rollei and had a perfectly good one in stock. He really felt sorry for me. For $10.00 he replaced the hood with a perfect condition one and my dad never knew about the camera wreck.

It has been 62 years since that happened and I still have that camera and it is in excellent condition. I might just buy some film and use it from time-to-time. I might even photograph an indoor basketball game just to tempt fate.
I nthe 1950s my father bought a Rolleiflex 2.8D wh... (show quote)


The Rollei f/2.8 was the Cadillac of all the TLRs. Beautifully designed and executed as were all Rolleis,but had the extra pizzazz of that bigger front lens element Glad you came out of your experience unscathed and without disappointing your dad.
Go to
Feb 4, 2024 11:06:42   #
Tedcritch wrote:
Anyone else currently using Kowa med format cameras or am I all alone?


My first medium format SLR was a Kowa. I think a "66 Super." It performed very well for me and the only complaint I ever had about it was the huge and cumbersome film backs which had mechanical dark slides built into them. As for sharpness, there are several 20x30 portraits hanging over local fireplaces and sofas that attest to that. My first wedding camera. It did eventually fail me and the difficulty of getting it repaired forced me financially to pick up a used Mamiya 645, lenses and film holders. A workhorse of a system. When I finally bit the bullet and opened my studio I bought RBs for use in studio because of the luck I'd had with the 645 system.
Go to
Feb 4, 2024 10:52:47   #
BebuLamar wrote:
I wonder if his camera survive and which is it?


In 1986, I was on the roof of a downtown hotel (this is a relatively small city, the hotel had only six floors) to make pictures of the Thunderbirds, the Air Force's demonstration team. Due to vertigo, I assume, I fell on a skylight which immediately disintegrated and I found myself falling the entire distance through the hotel's atrium lobby to the flagstone floor below. My Nikon FE with 70-210 f/2.8 lens fell with me. After weeks of intensive care and a couple of months in a rehab hospital, I was able to walk again.

I took the camera and lens to our local camera store (now defunct, alas) and their staff repairman removed the bodies of 3 screws in the lens mount which had sheared off, replaced them, and the rig worked as well as ever.
Go to
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Feb 3, 2024 15:20:29   #
JD750 wrote:
The old days are the new days, mirrorless cameras suck batteries dry at an amazing rate.


Afraid a mirrorless is a bucket list item for me.
Go to
Feb 3, 2024 12:14:12   #
Longshadow wrote:
I don't have to dig out the cable and make sure the camera has a sufficient charge in the battery for the duration of the process.
Less than 10 seconds to remove the card and insert it into the reader.

I use a card reader all the time.


As do I. A habit formed back in the day, when battery life was not so consistent nor as long lasting as today.
Go to
Jan 28, 2024 18:22:04   #
paulrnzpn wrote:
Good humour is always a good thing. I use it a lot when I am shooting people. In fact, I am not very serious anytime really. It annoys some folk, but most people like humour.


Very much worth the practice. Even if it doesn't help the subject, it keeps me loose.
Go to
Jan 27, 2024 21:23:58   #
paulrnzpn wrote:
I know you were. So I kid back.


Excellent, my friend.
Go to
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Jan 27, 2024 21:15:01   #
paulrnzpn wrote:
Yes, please do. It is well worth it.


Kidding you, my friend. She's lovely all over.
Go to
Jan 27, 2024 20:10:20   #
nut4golf wrote:
Great eyes!


She has eyes? I'd better look again.
Go to
Jan 23, 2024 12:35:49   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Music to my ears.


Ding, ding, ding! Toot, toot.
Go to
Jan 23, 2024 12:29:21   #
Ask here: https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/s-116-1.html The people who moderate this UHH section are all very accomplished editors and should be able to make suggestions of a program to fit your needs.
Go to
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Jan 21, 2024 23:29:07   #
User ID wrote:
Apostrophes ? Considered it. Rejected it.

Hope you enjoyed all those weddings. Its the one thing I avoided all thru my career, just cant stomach them. Even tried to duck my sisters (huge) wedding. I got marrried at city hall.The only weddings I would do (outside of family or good friends) were a few "non-first" weddings for my existing commercial clients. Those are just routine event jobs.

Most memorable friend wedding involved a very pregnant bride, six drunken brothers of the groom, plus all the "usual suspects" in a very small grange hall. "Reality TV" couldnt come halfway close !

Things "gone wrong" with a family wedding job ?!? I can still ROTFLMFAO about having taken my sweeeeeet time printing a cousins 100% freebie wedding and then they split up right about when I finished it. Great timing !

I notice your reply includes your resume and "pro gear" ... also verrrry UHH. I NEVVVVUH do that. Its just such smarmy grandstanding. Ill only disclose whatever specific experience applies to the discusson of the moment.
Apostrophes ? Considered it. Rejected it. br br H... (show quote)


Whatever you say, chief. I thought the "pro gear" I listed would fall under your assessment of trash. I'm encouraged by your acceptance of them as suitable for professional use. Have a good rest of the weekend.
Go to
Jan 21, 2024 22:00:41   #
User ID wrote:
So you are wondering about how "we" all did something that never happened ?!? Youre just being sooooo typically UHH. Just cuz you shot your daughters wedding with it doesnt exempt it from being trashy. Some fundamental things apply. A spade is still a spade, as time goes by. That is all.


WTF is soooo typically UHH? You don't know me. You're just unhappy because I called out something silly that you said. I don't have a daughter but if I did, I'd have hired one of my colleagues to photograph her wedding. My theory is that if something goes wrong with someone's wedding, a client will sue you. PPA has insurance for that. Friends or family will just quietly hate you.

I have photographed more weddings than I can remember in my 20 plus years of studio operation. 30 or 35 a year, anyway. I retired before digital was mainstream. My studio cameras were RB-67s, most location work was done with Mamiya 645's with Metz 60CT series flashes. I guess those would be considered trashy by the elite Hasselblad and Leica crowd, but they served me well for many years and made me several dollars. Mamiya lenses are as good as you want them to be and the cameras are sturdy and reliable.

Casual work was done with an EOS 10s and a couple of Minolta X-700s with motor drives because the earlier autofocus cameras were somewhat easily fooled by rapid changes of direction and didn't work well under the 'not so bright' lighting of high school football stadiums. More trashy stuff, I know.

I have used a lot of photographic fundamentals over the years, but never mastered the use of a spade. Spade photography would seem to be a pretty arcane craft. If you are well versed in it, perhaps you could make some bucks selling 'how to' videos.

By the way, you should consider using apostrophes when using contractions.
Go to
Jan 21, 2024 11:01:47   #
Very nicely done! Both pose and setting. The model is quite lovely and looks quite comfortable in the scene.
Go to
Jan 21, 2024 10:06:12   #
Fantastic work!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 376 next>>
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.