Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: BlackRipleyDog
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 82 next>>
Apr 22, 2022 09:46:24   #
dennis2146 wrote:
WOW!!! I love your shotgun approach, much like when you post 10-15 links to prove some point you want to make, many of them of course not working or incorrect. But have you considered the correct reason for Russia making a statement that Biden has Dementia? To be honest, Biden really does suffer from Dementia. As a Left Winger you are to be commended, not really but I was trying to be somewhat kind, for standing up for Biden, a man who has been a lying corrupt politician for close to 50 years now. But the Russians and the rest of the world are also to be commended for telling the truth. It only takes the watching of Biden in news casts making numerous errors in his speech, forgetting where he is and who he is, his walking around with no clue what he is doing and who should be taking care of him. News casts show he truly needs his wife, Jill or some other handler almost holding his hand and leading the way or correcting his comments on a daily basis.

Why can't you and of course your kid, the little princess who supports your idiotic comments, at least speak the truth? Biden is sick, he has Dementia and is unfit to lead.

AFTER Ronald Reagan was President he too suffered from Dementia/Alzheimers. If he had suffered that disease while President I would be the first one to say he should be removed from office. Why is it you on the Left are unable to recognize the signs of Dementia in President Biden? For the good of America why is it you cannot agree he should be removed from office?

Dennis
WOW!!! I love your shotgun approach, much like wh... (show quote)


If it weren't for double-standards, the left would have no standards at all. Oft-used bromide I know, but true just the same.
Go to
Apr 22, 2022 09:39:14   #
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
Could the reason be that Russia is upset that President Biden has been leading a pressure campaign against Russia by the world to isolate Russia economically?

Could it be that President Biden has been leading the way in arming Ukraine in its fight against Russia?

Could it be that Russia couldn't sustain their invasion and attacks on multiple fronts because they didn't anticipate the full extent of the Ukranian resistance?

Could it be that Russia misguidedly thought that Ukrainians would simply lay down their arms and simply welcome the Russian invasion with open arms?

Could it be that Ukraine's military is better trained than Russia's military?

Could it be that Ukraine's men who've been told to report for duty to defend their country are determined to push Russia out of Ukraine at all costs, have suffered far fewer losses of life than the Russian conscripts?

Could it be that Russia is trying to deflect from their incompetence in Putin’s decision to invade and attack Ukraine?

Could it be that Russia is trying to change the topic away from the war crimes and genocide which Russian troops have committed in Ukraine ?

Could it be that Russia doesn't want its citizens to know about all of the mass Graves which have recently been discovered in Ukraine?

Could it be that Russia is trying to hide the real story of how the Moskva was sunk with some Russian sailors still on-board?

This article is nothing more than Russian Propaganda!

Putin has suppressed the truth about Putin's FAILED war within Russian media!
Could the reason be that Russia is upset that Pres... (show quote)


Most of what you say is true, except that Biden IS incapacitated and any mention of him personally doing anything such as "leading" are widely overstated except for those rare moments of lucidity he might experience. He is only following directions he is given by a staffer in a rabbit costume. He couldn't lead the way out of a urine-soaked paper bag. Putin is just reacting to the reality on the ground in Ukraine by emphasizing the obvious about Biden.
Go to
Apr 9, 2022 10:08:08   #
Ysarex wrote:
No, it's more than that. It's getting a better image if the business card is recording more detail per unit area than the postcard.


Prove that premise with a D500 and a D850.
Go to
Apr 9, 2022 09:48:51   #
Drbobcameraguy wrote:
I agree with you but think about this. If we have an Fx and Dx camera both of 12 megapixels which one can make a better crop? The DX has 12 megapixels to crop from the FX starts at a disadvantage because it has only 12 megapixels and has to crop just to equal the DX camera photo. Think about that


But we are talking about something as subjective as IQ. I can overlay a D300 image at 12mpxl DX over a D700 image at 12mpxl FX. The D300 image is showing the same magnification natively as the D700 image. A DX sensor does not behave as a 1.5x teleconverter on the FX lens. That has been the claim all along when the term "Reach" is used.
It is just same as projecting an image onto a post card and then throwing white business card on top of the post card. Just a smaller area and a tighter angle-of view.
Go to
Apr 9, 2022 08:32:56   #
User ID wrote:
I am a specialist at trolling trolls for amusement, and yes a master at it.


Ah yes. The Krueger-Dunning Effect.
Go to
Apr 8, 2022 20:02:48   #
jcboy3 wrote:
You should have used example images of the same scene, using the same lens on a DX and FX body.

If you look through the viewfinder, a subject in the DX viewfinder will fill more of the frame. Hence, "reach".

If you compare a high MP FX with a typical DX, you will be able to crop the image to similar magnification. But you didn't get to see the subject better with the FX, as you can with the DX. Hence, "reach"

With modern high MP FF mirrorless, you can set the image to DX mode, and see the same magnification. In that case, the DX camera doesn't have more "reach"; it is the same magnification as can be gotten with the FF. If you do that iwth a normal MP FF mirrorless, then you lose resolution. But you still get the same "reach".

Thus, a DX body increases the "reach" of an FX lens while using the camera, and perhaps while processing the image.
You should have used example images of the same sc... (show quote)


Nope, still not buying it.
Go to
Apr 7, 2022 20:07:12   #
User ID wrote:
Maybe I was unclear ... this thread is blatantly intentional trolling ... great "family fun".

Its nothing more than amateur mildly comic entertainment, a "Gong Show".

I await some amusing escalation and, acoarst, am actually grateful for your providing a bit of weeknight diversion.


Wow, how perceptive. Yes, I do live to troll you. Thanks for playing along.
Go to
Apr 7, 2022 19:42:52   #
Bill_de wrote:
Thanks. I thought we had gotten past this. My bad.

---


Thanks. Now if we can only get User ID to stop running his mouth without his brain engaged, we might make some headway.
Go to
Apr 7, 2022 19:35:49   #
User ID wrote:
Trolls are in no position to accuse others of being passive aggressive.

Anywho, Im not passive. I call a spade a spade, a troll a troll and stupid as stupid.


Projection much?
Go to
Apr 7, 2022 19:33:50   #
User ID wrote:
A nugget of fully digested and ejected dog food.


So you view this forum as your personal fiefdom to spew your misinformation as you see fit. How very narcissistic of you.
Go to
Apr 7, 2022 19:25:30   #
User ID wrote:
Ya cant fix stupid.


And you apparently can't fix being passive aggressive.
Go to
Apr 7, 2022 19:19:10   #
Longshadow wrote:
Perception....

While true, it does not change the optical performance (characteristics) of the lens itself,
the area the sensor sees is smaller, so if one prints a 4x6 from each camera with the same lens (at the same setting if a zoom), the one from the crop sensor camera will appear to be a "magnified" or "telephoto" version.

Semantics.


If it actually increased sharpness, I would agree. In any case, it is the photographic equivilant of "Fools Gold".
You are just blowing up the smaller DX frame to match the already 4x6 FX frame.
Go to
Apr 7, 2022 19:17:05   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
You really can't argue with ignorance.


Well, if we are putting ourselves out there as learned individuals on the subject of the photography and influencing others, we could start with this nugget.
Go to
Apr 7, 2022 19:09:06   #
Bill_de wrote:
Is there something new here that I am missing?

---


Just of the oft-repeated claim that "Reach" exists, especially on this forum. In fact Nikon used a testimonial from a professional photographer lauding one of their earlier DX models as having "Reach".

As evidenced by an OP just today on a dilemma he had about what camera to take on a trip -
"My camera bodies are a D7000 and D810 (I take them both for backup and to give me more reach with the Dx body."
Go to
Apr 7, 2022 18:56:57   #
The Common Fallacy - Putting an FX lens on a DX (Crop) body changes the optical peformance of that lens.
A 300mm FX lens does not have the magnification of 450mm when mounted on a DX body. It only has the tighter field-of-view of a 450mm lens. The DX sensor is the same distance from the lens mount as an FX sensor. Same focal plane.
A sample frame from a Nikon DX is natively 14.3" x 9.5" opened in Photoshop. An FX frame is 27.5" x 18.4.
The DX area is about 1/4th the size of the FX area. To achieve comparable magnification, you have to up-size the DX frame 2 times to achieve the same image area. That alone gives the mistaken impression that the DX body has some mystical juju. If that were the case then the smallest possible sensor would be top of the camera food chain while everyone was working at adapting medium format lenses to them for the biggest bang for the buck.
"Reach" as frequently expressed on this forum and others is a unicorn and can't be quantified.


(Download)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 82 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.