Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: DerBiermeister
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 34 next>>
May 16, 2016 13:21:40   #
I don't think smart phone photography is for everyone. I admit, my Galaxy III is getting a bit long in the tooth, but with 8mb, it still takes an ok picture. But, in the 3 1/2 years that I've owned this phone, I've only taken about 4 shots. I use the heck out of it with what must be 50 or so different apps, but when I want to take a pic of something, the phone never gets the nod.
Go to
May 15, 2016 21:06:34   #
SBW wrote:
My God, could you be any more stupid? No.




Go to
May 15, 2016 13:01:07   #
Carl D wrote:
Quality of cell phones and the ever increasing popularity of Sony mirrorless cameras are putting dent in not only Nikon but Canon's bottom line. Neither Canon or Nikon have a descent mirrorless camera that can compete with Sony. Fugi, or Olympus.


Thinking out of the box here -- perhaps both Nikon and Canon should get into the smart phone business?
Go to
May 15, 2016 12:57:39   #
jerryc41 wrote:
No iPads? They seem to be popular, too.

Canon, in general, is a much larger company than Nikon, so they have some financial padding as people turn from real cameras. I wonder if Japan would consider Nikon "too big to fail" and bail them out if necessary. I doubt it. That seems to be an American tradition.

If Nikon goes out of business, that will ease the pressure on Canon, both technical and financial.



Perhaps a bit nostalgic, but going back some 50 years, not too long after WWII, Nikon was the periscope camera of choice by the US Navy. I can only imagine how the Navy cringed over not being able to use Nikon during the war. IMO, Nikon was the world's leader in optics during that era. Not sure where Canon fell into the picture.
Go to
May 15, 2016 12:52:32   #
wdross wrote:
Back then it was the Kodak cameras and point and shoots. And then one stepped up to a SLR. The difference is they were all film cameras and any mobile phone could not take a picture. The quality of the low end film cameras were no match for a SLR.

The reason there are very few point and shoot cameras to choose from these days is because they have been replaced by cellphones. And these cellphone have entry level cameras in them now. I know because I have a Galaxy S7 and it has quite a good camera in it. Do I use it often? No, I prefer to shoot with my Olympus and download my pictures to the cellphone. But that is because I have a preference for better photos than the cellphone is able to produce. The new generation doesn't really understand or necessarily want photographs that are better than a cellphone's pictures. And now with the likes of the S7, one can control aperture, shutter speed, ISO, white balance, modes, etc. plus it puts the shutter "button" on the edge buttons and has almost no shutter lag. Only recently have the cameras caught up to the cellphones in GPS, Bluetooth, and WiFi. The new generation is asking why do I need a DSLR and the answer for most of them is they don't need DSLR. The next generation is not buying into DSLRs and the older generations are both dying off (death is inevitable) and too weak and old to carry the heavy DSLRs (hence the relatively stable market for mirrorless). It will be only be a matter of time before DSLRs are very expensive and only owned by upper end and well heeled pros.
Back then it was the Kodak cameras and point and s... (show quote)


I think you've explained it best, even though there have been a lot of good posts in this thread.
Go to
May 15, 2016 11:22:08   #
From a rough estimate of the posts on this thread -- it looks to be about 2/3 favor AF for most close up stationary shots. I am actually pleased that most of you believe AF is not just some gimmick, because it sure does make life easier, especially when outdoors and having real difficulty viewing anything (viewfinder or Live View).

GREAT thread.
Go to
May 14, 2016 22:51:39   #
Nothing that I never suspected


Make sure to watch the video also
http://theamericanmirror.com/sally-miller-hillary-and-her-coke-habit/
Go to
May 14, 2016 19:45:28   #
dirtpusher wrote:
that what they said about bill, an bammer. i still have all my guns.


We live in different times. Do you deny that Hillary intends to do the Australian gun control?
Go to
May 14, 2016 19:15:56   #
green wrote:
lets see,
How many guns have you lost so far?


With a Hillary win (the 3rd term of the Commie), and her 3-4 Supreme Court Justices she'll get to appoint, the 2nd Amendment will essentially be history. She fully intends to implement the same gun grab that the Aussies instituted back in 1996.
Go to
May 14, 2016 15:56:33   #
green wrote:

what is a commie? have you ever seen a commie?


Anti-capitalist
Anti-Christian
Supports infanticide
Supports confiscation of guns

Any of this ringing a bell with you dude?

Look in the mirror and you'll begin to get a picture.
Go to
May 14, 2016 13:54:20   #
I don't know if he's black or white -- really don't care. But I DO know he is a commie and anti-American. We will rue the day (hell, we already have) that so many Americans were blind to his ideological objectives.
Go to
May 14, 2016 13:08:08   #
NeilL wrote:
Are we witnessing the Fall of the Roman Empire?


If we don't rid ourselves of the scurge of Progressive Liberalism -- then yes, the ball game is over. Every single program in our Government is unsustainable. Democrats don't give a shit, and Republicans are scared of their own shadow. I'm afraid we are fooked.
Go to
May 14, 2016 12:32:02   #
NeilL wrote:
This just received:-



LOL -- kind of puts things in the proper perspective, eay? Look how far the vision has fallen for Democrats. Really remarkable when you focus on it.
Go to
May 14, 2016 11:15:49   #
http://i.imgur.com/8HlAwkO.png?1
Go to
May 14, 2016 00:08:21   #
dirtpusher wrote:
depends on the type of site. you will have to read the rules of types not approved of.


Not a promotion of that site at all. No where did I tout the benefits of it, or even discuss what OTP is. It was a simple request for libtards like you to come give these people a reason to get up in the morning.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 34 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.