Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: flashgordonbrown
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 26 next>>
Feb 19, 2019 17:11:49   #
Wife & I spent one night of our Honeymoon there 50 years ago March 1st. We've been back once in the interim. We weren't aware of the latest developments, and are glad to know that it is being refurbished.
Go to
Feb 16, 2019 16:50:25   #
The way I heard it it was a golf cart!
Go to
Feb 7, 2019 10:42:05   #
Frank T wrote:
And so it goes. A smart, accomplished intelligent woman presents a threat to you, so you immediately attack her looks.
Sexist, misogynist and just stupid don't even begin to cover your actions.


Have you not heard her talK? The woman is a LOON!
Go to
Feb 6, 2019 14:00:44   #
jearlwebb wrote:
Howdy.
Yesterday I went online to get the phone number for LDSP to inquire if anything was in blossom yet before I took the 1 hour drive to get there. When I went to their website I noticed that they now require both an approved permit and $$$ to photograph for commercial usage.
I called the park and was told to talk to the Park Ranger in person, so I did.
I was told the min. cost would be $50.00 for 1 hour.
I told the Ranger no thank you, she did suggest an area I was not aware of that borders the State Park.
Take a right out of the Park and about 5 minutes on the right you will come to a road called "First Water".
It is a dirt road with MANY dips and pot holes, but doable just drive slow!
There is no cost as far as I could see, had great views of and surrounding landscape of Superstition Mountains.
BTW...some flowers are starting to bloom.
Howdy. br Yesterday I went online to get the phone... (show quote)


It depends on what their definition of "commercial photography" is. If you take a picture and sell copies of it as art, that isn't generally referred to as commercial photography. The general description of commercial photography is photos taken to promote a product or service. Sometimes wedding or portrait photographers are required to get a permit to photograph their subjects in public parks and venues. Also, the use of a tripod sometimes triggers the need for a permit. Sometimes, people with some small amount of authority get over zealous in their enforcement tactics and exceed the bounds of their authority. You have to decide how important it is to take your photos or to make a point.
Go to
Jan 22, 2019 12:58:54   #
Two things- #1: turn the shouifers/ body a bit more, and #2: turn the head/ eyes straight into the camera. These are minor criticisms, but sometimes it's the 'little things" that make an image grab people's attention. I've shot many thousands of portraits in my career, and I can admit that a lot of them didn't have the 'little things' taken care of, but I did always try to take care of them. One other thing-looking at your lighting diagram, I probably would place the background light directly behind the subject, unless you were looking for a graduated hot spot.
Go to
Jan 12, 2019 01:12:26   #
Gene51 wrote:
After you hit save, when you close it, the recompression of the image will cause some very minor degradation - even if you don't edit the image. If you do it a lot, artifacts become more evident. That's just common sense, and why they call jpeg a lossy format.

https://petapixel.com/2010/02/04/saving-jpeg-photos-hundreds-of-times/


There is a difference between 'saving' and 'closing'. If you open,view, and close,there is no loss of dsta. If you save without having made any changes, there will be some negligible loss of data. Done enough times,that process could have an effect on the quality of the image. I do a fair amount of adjusting my images using Picasa, even though it is no longer supported by Google. None of the adjustments in Picasa have any effect on the original file. When I have used Photoshop, I always made a copy of the original file and made my adjustments on that, leaving the original file intact. I don't claim to be an expert in post processing, but I know what has worked for me, and I'm comfortable in sharing.
Go to
Jan 10, 2019 15:12:44   #
Dahveed wrote:
Please critique my first home studio portraits taken this Christmas with an actual human being and not a mannequin head. These high-key portraits of my niece were shot with a Canon 80D, EF50mm f/1.4 USM lens, and 2 Flashpoint speedlites: one key and one fill triggered by a Flashpoint R2 Pro. The speedlites were attached to a Godox 32x32 inch softbox diffuser and a 30-inch silver umbrella. I also used a 32-inch round reflector, to fill the shadow under her neck, in the shot where you can see 3 catchlights in her eyes. A JTL 160 strobe blasted the white seamless paper background. PortraitPro Studio 18 helped smooth her skin tones as I'm not yet up to speed on related Photoshop techniques.

Be as brutally honest as you care to be. As a retiree, I'd love to channel this hobby into a small business.
Please critique my first home studio portraits tak... (show quote)

Any critique that I would have would be minor, and fall under the 'attention to detail' heading : in #1, I would slide the right hand down to the elbow. This would look more natural, and eliminate a distracting highlight. On 2 & 3, I concur with other comments regarding the back of the hands. It's always better to show the hands in profile if possible so that they are less distracting. I also agree about the hole in the hair.(again, a slight distraction). Exposure and focus are right on. And most people would love to have images of themselves as good as these!
Go to
Jan 10, 2019 14:22:12   #
sbohne wrote:
Man, after nearly 20 years I still can't believe there is confusion on this. Here we go:

A RAW file is all the data from the sensor capture. Your RAW files will need post-processing. When you open them as is, they are flat and lifeless. Some people use software that comes with their camera, others use Photoshop or OnOne Software RAW. Yes, the post-processing software normally permits saving to TIFF, jpg, gif, etc.

Ok, here's the whole "lossy" thing: if I were to save a RAW file as a TIFF, and again as a JPG, and I printed a 16x20" print of each file, you would see no difference in the two. Now, if I opened the JPG, edited it, saved it, and then repeated that process about 100 times, then you MIGHT be able to see a difference in a large print, most likely not on small prints. The amount of "loss" has really been mischaracterized; mostly by so-called "experts." One of these same experts told me that every image should have a Histogram that looks like a mountain range. Really? Even a marshmallow photographed on a white fur rug? Even a black cat on a bed of coal? A gray scarf on a gray background? His answer? "Yes." Well, that's just plain wrong.

If you learn how to make a proper exposure, jpg away. I owned 3 studios. We made hundreds of thousands of captures for portraits, weddings, and commercial photography. None of them RAW. None. Zero. Zip. Nada. Every single one, a jpg. And we made prints to size 40x60...and a couple of billboards. Why jpg? Because by the time my competitor across town had opened the RAW files from the wedding he shot on Saturday, I already had the album layout sent to the printers. The reason is TIME. My studios were busy, and people didn't feel like waiting two months for me to do all of the post-processing, and most of them wouldn't have been able to tell the difference between a print from a RAW file (which has to be saved as a jpg or tiff for printing) and a print from a straight jpg if it bit them on the ass.

Worried about blowing an exposure? Look in your manual for the AEB (Auto Exposure Bracketing) function. Depending on the camera, you can make up to 7 bracketed exposures. If you are REALLY anal, most cameras let you save a RAW file AND a jpg.

Nearly EVERY image needs some post-processing DEPENDING on what you are using it for. Taking a quick snapshot of the kids playing in the leaves? It's a memory captured...frozen for posterity. Will it hang in the Guggenheim? Probably not. Even if the color is off a tad, you can probably live with it.

Now, a bride photographed full length in a green room? You're going to need to work the image. You'll most likely have to remove a green color cast. But unless you've absolutely blown it (camera set on manual and you forgot), most images are not going to "be terrible without post-processing."

What happens to the quality of an image viewed in pp software vs a post-processed JPG? Nothing. Opening a file, viewing it, then closing it does nothing to the file. You can open, view, and close a bazillion times, and it will be the same file quality as the first time. Only EDITING and then SAVING causes any "loss." And there is not going to be a lot of that.

I hope this has been helpful.
Man, after nearly 20 years I still can't believe t... (show quote)

Amen brother. JPG is treated badly by the so- called experts. Any loss in processing JPGS can be avoided by making a copy and only working on that. My studio experience is similar to yours in that we never shot raw. My art photography is also all JPG, and I have made 20x30 images from cropped 10 mp images that look great. All of my cameras shoot raw as well as JPG, and for a while I used the setting that shot both, but I decided that so far I had never processed a raw image I was wasting a lot of storage space-both on my cards and my computer's hard drive. There are always self-appointed experts out there. My experience has been that you should learn the basics, learn how your camera functions, then set it on program and go. Your camera will show you what it's doing, and if you feel like adjusting it for reasons known only to you, you can do that. (I know that this last little bit is off topic, but I felt the need to interject that as additional food for thought )!
Go to
Dec 4, 2018 17:08:29   #
MT Shooter wrote:
Under no circumstances do "grey market" and "reputable" belong in the same sentence. If a seller were REPUTABLE then they would not have to sell grey market products. Simple.


I will respectfully disagree with that blanket statement. I have many years of experience in photo - retail. I have worked in shops where it was me. The owner, and a retired guy working part time, to a shop in LA WITH 80+ employees doing 12+ million$ per year. While we didn't sell 'grey-market ' products we did buy close-out lots of mdse, and sit onthem until we were the only source and would provide a store warranty. We had an in-house repair service so we could support that.. Having also been a manufacturers rep, I also have an understanding of what is required to maintain an acceptable level of inventory and service provision. If the retailers can properly provide service, and is up-front regarding the import ststus, reputable can certainly apply. .
Go to
Dec 4, 2018 16:08:32   #
cjc2 wrote:
Grey market = Asking for trouble. IMHO.


While 'grey market' is to some degree 'let the buyer beware', you are not getting an inferior product. What you are, to some degree, is taking a chance that you won't need warranty service, because the authorized US distributor will not service it under warranty, and in the case of Nikon, not service it at all. That being said, I must say that a large share of my photo equipment has been purchased 'grey' and I have not had any problems . Some dealers that sell 'grey-market' products offer a store warranty equal to the mfg's warranty. This can be as good or bad as the dealer's reputation. I have purchased a newly released camera from an overseas source, and actually had it in my hands before it was available from the authorized USA distributor! Also, when I had a problem of my own making, the US service center repaired it at no cost to me (I was up front with them- indicating that it was my error in creating the problem, and that I had purchased the camera from Japan)! As an aside, you have to take MtShooter's comments with a grain of salt. He's the owner of a camera shop, and has dealer arrangements with authorized supplier's of equipment. That's not a criticism of him in general, just a 'heads-up' when reading his statements about 'grey' and 'reputable'.
Go to
Dec 3, 2018 16:57:05   #
potica69 wrote:
Got a question: I want to buy a NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4 lense.

I've been using Google to research various suppliers of the lense. Many of them offer the lense new at list price of $1,069.95

Now, on Abe's of Maine, it offers the lense new for $655:

https://www.abesofmaine.com/Nikon_AF-S_DX_NIKKOR_16-80mm_f_2_8-4E_ED_VR_Lens_1029042.html

Is this price too good to be true? Could the lense be a gray market item, and if so, is a gray market item of good quality?
OK, here's the deal - 'gray market' has NOTHING to do with the quality of the product. It only refers to the method of import. It means that the product wasn't imported by the 'authorized' US distributor, so any repair needed is not covered by the US warranty. Some retailers sell both gray and authorized items, and offer a store warranty for the gray market product. That warranty may be just fine or not depending on the reputation and reliability of the retailer. Sometimes retailers that sell gray market products strip the normally included accessories from the package and then try to sell them to you at an inflated price, thereby negating .the perceived savings. Anytime a dealer starts trying to upsell you, you should run away quickly!
Can anyone offer comments that could shed light on this scenario?

Thanks
Got a question: I want to buy a NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 30, 2018 13:30:08   #
AzPicLady wrote:
I took these pictures at the Phoenix Zoo. The lavender ones were on a bush. The yellow ones were on a tree - or a HUGE bush, perhaps. (It was quite tall.)


I have an app that I downloaded called "plantsnap' that says that by opening the app you can photograph either the actual plant, or a picture of one and it will identify it. I haven't tried it yet, but it sounds good!
Go to
Nov 30, 2018 12:43:57   #
I'm 73, and I watch more basketball than golf - what does that say about me?
Go to
Nov 10, 2018 14:07:10   #
silverhawk wrote:
What do you think about Secret Underground/Undersea installations????
I find this very fascinating.

Richard Sauder Underground Bases and Tunnels - The Best Documentary Ever
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQc8OZ1mbV4
Hidden Underground Bases in America 2015
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=751RBx6s-sI

Underground Bases of the Elite
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eC4jEsKDgPQ

Fema Camps, Underground Military Bases, Bunkers and Tunnels Under the USA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiyGN19baNM




Truck Driver Confirms Underground City Beneath US. 2013
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzvobMUgeds&list=PLxZXm8G6Xc4LqvOgpR45eZu5ihH0Pi5ZS&index=2

Project Subterrene and Top Secret Undergound Tunnels Under America
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eykH0_7y_U&index=3&list=PLxZXm8G6Xc4LqvOgpR45eZu5ihH0Pi5ZS

Underground Elites: Secret Hideouts Sealing The Tunnels & What The U.S. Government Is Not Telling US
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USKCIO8Ksfo

Is the US military digging for WW3 Frenzy as 'secret underground tunnels' MAPPED
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0acXWE1sCs

5 Secret Off-Limits Underground Locations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9n8AMQkqSk
5 Secret Military Bases Hidden Underground
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PREoe174B_Y


This will show it's possible...lol

We Went Down Under…In to the caves of Kansas City, MO. SubTropolis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiPFYjvhvK8

UNDERGROUND CITIES in MISSOURI . What are they for?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fhsgnd4-4-A
What do you think about Secret Underground/Underse... (show quote)


If they're secret, how do all these sources know about them? Just asking!
Go to
Nov 10, 2018 14:04:24   #
Huey Driver wrote:
Old too soon and smart to late !!! A bit of Amish wisdom!



Life Gets Better With Age, Read it through to the end, it gets better as you go!


*
I've learned that I like my teacher because she cries when we sing "Silent Night." Age 5
*
I've learned that our dog doesn't want to eat my broccoli either. Age 7
*
I've learned that when I wave to people in the country, they stop what they are doing and wave back. Age 9
*
I've learned that just when I get my room the way I like it, Mom makes me clean it up again. Age 12
*
I've learned that if you want to cheer yourself up, you should try cheering someone else up. Age 14
*
I've learned that although it's hard to admit it, I'm secretly glad my parents are strict with me. Age 15
*
I've learned that silent company is often more healing than words of advice. Age 24
*
I've learned that brushing my child's hair is one of life's great pleasures. Age 26
*
I've learned that wherever I go, the world's worst drivers have followed me there. Age 29
*
I've learned that if someone says something unkind about me, I must live so that no one will believe it. Age 30
*
I've learned that there are people who love you dearly but just don't know how to show it. Age 42
*
I've learned that you can make someone's day by simply sending them a little note. Age 44
*
I've learned that the greater a person's sense of guilt, the greater his or her need to cast blame on others. Age 46
*
I've learned that children and grandparents are natural allies. Age 47
*
I've learned that no matter what happens, or how bad it seems today, life does go on and it will be better tomorrow. Age 48
*
I've learned that singing "Amazing Grace" can lift my spirits for hours. Age 49
*
I've learned that motel mattresses are better on the side away from the phone. Age 50
*
I've learned that you can tell a lot about a man by the way he handles these three things: a rainy day, lost luggage, and tangled Christmas tree lights. Age 51
*
I've learned that keeping a vegetable garden is worth a medicine cabinet full of pills. Age 52
*
I've learned that regardless of your relationship with your parents, you miss them terribly after they die. Age 53
*
I've learned that making a living is not the same thing as making a life. Age 58
*
I've learned that life sometimes gives you a second chance. Age 62
*
I've learned that you shouldn't go through life with a catcher's mitt on both hands. You need to be able to throw something back. Age 64
*
I've learned that if you pursue happiness, it will elude you. But if you focus on your family, the needs of others, your work, meeting new people,
And doing the very best you can, happiness will find you. Age 65



* I've learned that whenever I decide something with kindness, I usually make the right decision. Age 66
*
I've learned that everyone can use a prayer. Age 72
*
I've learned that even when I have pains, I don't have to be one. Age 74
*
I've learned that every day you should reach out and touch someone. People love that human touch - holding hands, a warm hug,
Or just a friendly pat on the back. Age 76
*
I've learned that I still have a lot to learn. Age 78

*

I’ve learned that life is what you make it, and your life is much better when you make someone happy. Age 80+


"""Old Friends are the best friends!"""
Old too soon and smart to late !!! A bit of Amish... (show quote)


Sorry to be picky, but the original quote is "Too soon old, too late smart". That's how an Amish person would phrase it.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 26 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.