HAHAHAHA!

Thank you for posting this question! You just lost your ENTIRE QANON theory regarding the Mar a Lago raid!

IF Chump had FOLLOWED the DOCUMENTED PROCEDURE for DECLASSIFYING documents, there would be a PAPER TRAIL of said DECLASSIFICATION! MULTIPLE agencies would be involved where that PAPER TRAIL would have been signed off on, making it very improbable, if not impossible, for the FBI to plan such a HARE-BRAINED IDEA.

This is the most ABSURD post from you yet!

Judge Amy Berman Jackson.


Let me enlighten YOU.

She ruled: That the National Archives and Records Administration had no power to “seize control of them” because Mr. Clinton had used his authority under the Presidential Records Act to declare the recordings part of his personal records.

While audio tapes "could be classified", the ones you refer to were NOT!

Documents contained in folders marked "Secret", "Top Secret", or "Confidential" would have to be "de-classified" BEFORE or AT THE TIME a president could use his authority under the Presidential Records Act to declare the recordings part of his personal records and take the home.

Do YOU have any documentation that chump followed procedure? Maybe YOU can "think" one up?

BIGLY difference between the Clinton tapes decision and what your fuhrer did.... BIGLY difference!

See... this is EXACTLY why you are in the group of chump monkeys that trolls the Attic.


Chump was SO incensed over sending Hillary to jail that ANY damaging documentation he had... or as he has shown recently, that he THOUGHT he had on her, he would have brought it out into the open. Even NOW, he doesn't make such claim... just that the raid on Mar a Lago MIGHT have been to due to the FBI looking for deleted emails.

Deranged!

Remember now.... due to his hatred of Hillary, he upped the penalty from 3 to 5 years that he thought (there's that word again) he was going to nail her on.

Making it harder for people in poor areas to vote does NOT improve voter integrity, not one bit.

Trying to take control of election outcomes does NOT support your claim.

IF the GOP truly wanted voter integrity, then why don't they do away with the electoral college?


Your comment about the democrats is BS.

If you don't use voter ID then, what exactly do you propose to use to prove you are a legal citizen?

In this year’s elec­tion, Texas voters are facing a new voter iden­ti­fic­a­tion law. For many of them, it’ll mean present­ing one of a short list of photo IDs at the polls before cast­ing a ballot. But voters who face obstacles to obtain­ing one of those photo IDs are still able to vote. Those voters need to present another accept­able docu­ment veri­fy­ing their iden­tity, like a current util­ity bill, and sign a sworn state­ment indic­at­ing the reason that they were unable to obtain one of the accep­ted photo IDs.

Yet, accord­ing to its own website, the Texas Secret­ary of State’s office has held only one event this year where elec­tion offi­cials have gone into communit­ies to provide free photo IDs to voters that need them, despite a legal require­ment that the state estab­lish a program to do so.

As you drive the highways of Houston, you might also have seen a billboard indicating you need a passport in order to vote. That's simply NOT true!

That is NOT trying to establish voting integrity! Just the opposite!