you are the only one insulting people on this thread...you called me a liar and a troll, I am neither.

The balloon illustrates the same principle as a rocket, Newton's 3rd law. Ok, you may have misunderstood the concept... let's move on

OK, now about Intelligent Design... OK, I agree with you. To me it is obvious that the universe was created by consciousness, and not the product of random chance... I agree.

However, it is not a science... you cannot say that because in our limited experience everything complex seems to be designed...therefore the universe must be designed... that is faulty logic.

you are the only one insulting people on this thread...you called me a liar and a troll, I am neither.

The balloon illustrates the same principle as a rocket, Newton's 3rd law. Ok, you may have misunderstood the concept... let's move on

OK, now about Intelligent Design... OK, I agree with you. To me it is obvious that the universe was created by consciousness, and not the product of random chance... I agree.

However, it is not a science... you cannot say that because in our limited experience everything complex seems to be designed...therefore the universe must be designed... that is faulty logic.

you are the only one insulting people on this thread...you called me a liar and a troll, I am neither.

The balloon illustrates the same principle as a rocket, Newton's 3rd law. Ok, you may have misunderstood the concept... let's move on

OK, now about Intelligent Design... OK, I agree with you. To me it is obvious that the universe was created by consciousness, and not the product of random chance... I agree.

However, it is not a science... you cannot say that because in our limited experience everything complex seems to be designed...therefore the universe must be designed... that is faulty logic.

"It is not enough to say that design is a more likely scenario to explain a world full of well-designed things. It strikes me as urgent to insist that you not allow your mind to surrender the absolute clarity that all complex and magnificent things were made that way. Once you allow the intellect to consider that an elaborate organism with trillions of microscopic interactive components can be an accident... you have essentially "lost your mind."- Jay Homnick <<<Not my words

I said "knowledge." Who did you think said it? Go back and read.

Information, when acquired, is knowledge.

Science Lesson 1: Knowledge is acquired, NOT caused.

Science Lesson 2: The sequences in DNA were here, on earth, long before man arrived and conceived of a-God.

Science Lesson 3: There is no evidence that man was formed by a supernatural from a dust-ball and woman from dust-ball-man's rib.

Science Lesson 4: Science does "not observe."

Science Lesson 5: The origin of DNA is not known, nor is the origin of man.

Science Lesson 6: Intelligence does not cause.
__________
Quit trying to sound "intelligent" and get science-savvy. Start here and take the Clown with you:
http://www.nasonline.org/

You have presented NO proof..........and when presented with truth you look away.....You have NO words of your own.....you quote Meyer and other ID proponents as though

they have the truth, and you need only relay it repeatedly to make it so.....The Discovery Institute and crew are either incompetent, or dishonest, or both. The don't do

science, have published no significant research, and are shunned or ignored by the mainstream scientific community. You have made many dishonest statements in

this thread, and many that cannot be supported by an examination of the facts. Your communal gloat with Rac is a great example of your immaturity, insecurity,

and general childish demeanor. You don't have the education or wisdom to examine the evidence that overturns your "science". For you, ignorance is bliss.

I don't speak for James or Silver, and they don't speak for me. I don't begrudge you your religious beliefs, but I am confounded by your attempts to

support your beliefs by distorting or ignoring established scientific principles.