Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: RealBohemian
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 25 next>>
Jul 30, 2013 18:47:59   #
OUSooner wrote:
You can't go wrong with the D7000! Great camera! :thumbup: :thumbup:


Old technology
Go to
Jul 30, 2013 15:55:20   #
[quote=buffoto]What can I do better?[/

All is just perfect just for No3 try cropping the sun out of the dead center
Go to
Jul 30, 2013 01:43:31   #
Thank you all for your help, I've buy 18-200,and so far i like the weight, since 18-300 is the heaviest Nikon super zoom,this look like affordable traveling size.
Go to
Jul 30, 2013 01:38:54   #
DOOK wrote:
GDN is short for Graduated Neutral Density. One half is darkened, while the other half is clear glass. They come in 1 stop (.3), 2 stops (.6), & 3 stops (.9). 2 stops is by far the most common. They are available as a round screw in filter, or as a square 'drop in'. Also, the join between clear & dark can be feathered or sharp. Mine is a 77mm 2 stop feathered screw in, which fits all of my Sigma lenses.

The filter rotates like a CPL filter. The idea is to darken the sky, while keeping the foreground correctly exposed. I find it more practical than a CPL, as it can be used in any weather conditions. Also, it has an even affect with all lenses (a CPL tends to have an uneven affect on WA lenses, with one side of the image being darker than the other). I think a GDN filter is a great asset for landscaping-JMO. Earl.
GDN is short for Graduated Neutral Density. One ha... (show quote)


My mistake i read at firs that GND is somewhere part of EFFECTS/COLOR SKETCH' filters on camera.
IMO CPL works differently than GND,CPL works on reflections (Glass;water,rain) GND won't eliminate reflections
Go to
Jul 29, 2013 11:02:59   #
DOOK wrote:
D7100/Sigma 17-50mm.

#1 is standard photo for comparison. #2 is with GND filter. #3 is with camera set on 'EFFECTS/COLOR SKETCH'. I am just starting to play around with 'Scene' & 'Effects' modes. It's fun. Have recently received my book, 'D7100 for Dummies'--excellent book--makes a lot more sense than the Nikon manual.


What filter exactly are you using,there is not GND !
Go to
Jul 28, 2013 19:12:41   #
PCity wrote:
I had a 18-135mm for my D200. Out of the country, camera amd lens fell of the bed and the lens mount broke. Considering the cost to repair, I decided I'd go for an 18-200mm Nikon. I waited long enoogh for there to be a $200 reduction sale going on and got it.

I went back and forth between getting the 18-200mm or the newer 18-300mm. Glade I got the 200 as while the 300 gives a longer reach, it is Bigger and Heavier.

Depending on the weight of your camera, adding a Heavy lens can get to you if you have to carry it around for a good part of ther day.

I recently retired, and have been on trips to Alaska, Europe and the British Isles...and I'm glade the load I carried wasn't any heavier.

A friend once told me that in most cases the diffeence between Xmm and Ymm can be achieved by moving a couple of feet closer. Of course it depends on were you are, and whether you can step foward those couple of feet.
I had a 18-135mm for my D200. Out of the country,... (show quote)


Thank you,it is to be taken in considerations, and yes I'm not going any stronger with my kidney transplant(going on to 14th year now :o)
Go to
Jul 28, 2013 19:09:33   #
MT Shooter wrote:
The 18-200mm on the D7100 will yield a 35mm equivalent of a 27-300mm lens, virtually the same as the FX 28-300mm on the D800. Might be the best choice as you would both then be shooting the same scene fully framed on your sensors.
My experience with Tamron products on Nikons has been less than stellar.


Your point is a good one.That exactly is reason of this forum.Thank you MT
Go to
Jul 28, 2013 13:58:13   #
Bill Emmett wrote:
I own and shoot with a Tamron 18-270mm on my Canon cameras. I did have to send the Tamron back for "soft" images. It came back with these items on the service order, cleaned manufacturing debris, replaced lens elements, and calibrated to Canon 50D specs. This greatly improve my images, and I now use it as my normal walk-around lens. It is not the same quality as my "L" quality lenses, and cannot expect it to perform as a "L" lens. But, does produce acceptable results.
I own and shoot with a Tamron 18-270mm on my Canon... (show quote)


I can't imagine go through this process,thank you
Go to
Jul 28, 2013 13:56:34   #
dooragdragon wrote:
A few shots with the Tamron 18-270mm on a D3100 nikon


nice take ,i can't get anything close to this ,must be a lemon they give me.
Go to
Jul 28, 2013 13:51:07   #
MT Shooter wrote:
I am wondering why you just don't use the almost perfect super-zoom you already own? The Nikon 28-300mm works fantastic on the D7100 and if you go to the 18-300mm you only gain a little bit on the wide end yet have the same tele end. I just cannot understand why you would want to intentionally duplicate focal lengths is all.


MT D800 is mostly used at same time by my wife,and those are ALL our lenses right now,any good solution now? Thanks
Go to
Jul 28, 2013 09:34:16   #
Thanks for your reply,what was your decision to get 300,since you had 200?
Go to
Jul 28, 2013 09:08:35   #
I own D7100 upgraded from D90,now is time to look for new lens.I have DX 40mm Macro Nikon and using also from my D800 FX Nikon lens 28-300 and 105/2.8 macro ,i need another lens DX preferably for travel which should be Mega zoom as they call them.

I purchased and trying now (?miracle lens?) Tamron 18 -270 which was recommended in DPreview,and you can't really believe all what they write.I wonder sometimes who writes those reviews. This lens is bad, brand new and it is not sharp almost in any positions and aperture. 6x4 look decent but enlargements over 50% is blurry and never sharp, i just couldn't find anything positive about it so far but low weight.
I have Google those two - 18-200 or 18 -300mm Nikon as they have same parameters (300 little bit longer)
Ken Rockwell call 18-200 awesome!
DPreview didn't help me decide,and recently there is a lot of Nikon18-200mm on sale and used, makes you wonder, is it because 18-300 is new and people upgrading from 18-200 them?
Has anybody have experience with any of those zooms? Please help.
Go to
Jul 28, 2013 08:26:46   #
andywilk38 wrote:
D800 or D3? (it's probably safe to say I can't afford a D4)

I’m a general photographer shooting weddings, music gigs, commercial, lifestyle, landscape…., but not sport, using Nikon D700 and D90. At weddings and gigs I typically mount my 24-70 to the D700 and my 70-200 to my D90. For all other commissions I use my D700 and have time to change lenses, as required.

I’m looking to replace the DX D90 with an FX and considering a D800 or D3 model. My greatest challenge is low light environments, but I also love detail into which I often crop. I also wish the shutter noise on the D700 for weddings and classical concerts was quieter. I’m not at all interested in video. A consideration with the D800 is the knock-on effect of file size regarding storage, electronic file share and processing time, bigger cards etc.

I’d be grateful for your opinions/experience to take into consideration in making my choice.

Thanks

Andrew
D800 or D3? (it's probably safe to say I can't aff... (show quote)


I don't own or have any experience with D3,but i own D800,if anything counts, enlargements are REALLY stunning,it have more features than i can learn, it is one outstanding camera with proper lens(for given job)
Go to
Jul 25, 2013 13:05:13   #
TimS wrote:
O.K., there is something wrong with this photo but I can't quite put my finger on it. Is it the colors in the background - do I need to warm them up? I thought having the warmer tones of my kids against the cool tones of the beach would be nice but its just not doing it for me.

What do you think? What would you do to make this better?

(This is a reduced quality version of the original.)

Thanks in advance!


I'll be Bold,sorry
What is wrong.(IMO)
This set up fits more to studio portrait where you take advantage of lights and shades.
I don't see any shades, must be high noon,for portrait bad.
For snapshot too stationary. If you want memory shot,find pleasant place.
Positioning in this picture i call it STS(Stop,Turn,Smile) boys are nice and it look like they can act normally as with small kids it is more difficult.
Make them act more natural, not this artificial smiles, i mean let one sit, other kneel,say something funny, and don't let them look straight into camera lens.
Horizon Level and oldest boy head is distracting,background too bright and sharp sun isn't really pleasant on their faces.
I photograph family or anything else almost like I'm paid for it.
My wife told me once "treat me rather like stranger". So I did, it is more polite and i love it,same with photo taking. Best family pictures are candid ones i believe, from some distance when kids are not aware of camera and they behave normal.
Again this is just my opinion.
Go to
Jul 23, 2013 02:27:54   #
[quote=Nikonian72]'Insects' is an extremely broad category.



Thank you, it didn't answer my questions.Remove wrong entry or not and why.
Yes,i understand, it is broad category, but spiders and lizard don't belong there.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 25 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.