Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: CraigFair
Page: <<prev 1 ... 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 ... 445 next>>
Dec 24, 2014 17:31:21   #
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
Bobs knobs really help. Prime focus or I'm guessing at least a Barlow.
Prime Focus with camera on Live View and zoooomed in all the way.
Go to
Dec 24, 2014 17:29:10   #
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
Shot at the VLA on the plains of St. Augustin


I looked at the EXIF, you were actually there. "WOW". :thumbup:
How, when & why???
Craig
Go to
Dec 24, 2014 17:24:10   #
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
Nice clean shot Craig. That's one of your better shots. Well done.
Thank you Jim. I think it might be due to the fact I spent 1.5hr collimating the scope.
I wish I knew an easier, quicker and more accurate way than just Sighting a Star and making it round twisting my Bob's Knobs.
Go to
Check out Travel Photography - Tips and More section of our forum.
Dec 24, 2014 12:29:00   #
Chris F. wrote:
I took the new lens to AT&T Park on Tuesday night, this time with my 7D instead of the 5DIII. The extra reach was nice on the cropped frame camera, but I did see some drawbacks. The results are still pretty good for the most part, especially on subjects that are stationary or moving slowly. I needed more shutter speed (more than 1/500 – 1/800 to stop the ball) which I could not get.

Due to fast motion capture, I had to push the 7D to its limits with this lens by increasing shutter speed and ISO which left most shots with too much noise (grain). It was a night game and surprisingly enough, the lower artificial light (compared to the day game) limited my shutter speed to 1/500 to 1/800 with ISOs of 1250 – 1600 at around 500 mm. I needed to be up around 1/4000 which was not possible. With the lower light conditions of a ballpark at night, this f 6.3 lens struggled. While the lens works okay on the 7D during the day, it works much better on the 5DIII at night.

My findings are completely understandable and in my opinion (not trying to sound like a snob) performed as expected for a large lens of 600 mm costing only $1059. The lens is great for use with lots of light, but I prefer my Canon 100-400 at night. Here are a few shots:
I took the new lens to AT&T Park on Tuesday ni... (show quote)


Very nice set of test shots Chris.
Craig
Go to
Dec 24, 2014 06:36:56   #
Chris F. wrote:
Very cool shot!
Thank you Chris, I see you have the Tamron 150-600 mm too.
Cool Lens I really like mine.
Go to
Dec 24, 2014 06:28:50   #
I spent 1.5 hr collimating my scope and I think I got it right.
Just finished Jupiter.
Craig


(Download)
Go to
Dec 24, 2014 02:16:36   #
I see Jim and I both arose to the challenge of shooting the 24hr old Moon. Plus Orion Nebula
Nikon D600 w/2x Teleconverter, 8" Meade Telescope 4000mm, ISO 50, 1 sec. at f/16


(Download)

Orion Nebula

(Download)
Go to
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Dec 23, 2014 13:00:22   #
Moxie wrote:
Thanks Craig!


Hope to see more of your work in the Astronomical Photography Forum.
Craig
Go to
Dec 23, 2014 12:15:19   #
Moxie wrote:
Shot with a Canon 6D and a Sigma 150-500mm @ 500mm.


Nice shot. The clouds are so hard to shoot without Flaring. Well done.
Craig
Go to
Dec 23, 2014 10:32:30   #
gwong1 wrote:
Craig, Nice. I like the clouds, looks mysterious. Gary


Thank you Gary, Glad you're able to see the effect.
Craig
Go to
Dec 22, 2014 12:36:58   #
Waiting for Clear Skies so I thought I would rework some older shots in the mean time. Some clouds are visible in this shot.
Nikon D600 w/Tamron 150-600mm Lens
600mm
ISO 100
f/8
1/125 sec.
Processed in Lightroom & Topaz Detail3
Cropped 200%
Craig

Last Quarter

(Download)
Go to
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Dec 21, 2014 21:50:09   #
imagemeister wrote:
I would attribute it more to the camera body than the lens .......

Hi Imagemeister the camera is pretty good in low light but the Nikon 28-300mm I had would not have performed like this lens did in similar lighting.
It would have been on the hunt for a while. With the Tamron it just snapped right to the Powerlines and held.
The Camera and Lens do make a good Pair.
Craig
Go to
Dec 21, 2014 21:42:07   #
Shellback wrote:
Nice -
Thanks for posting this - I was beginning to think I was having problems with my rig - I've got the 610 with that lens and I've noticed the photos are brighter than what I am used to - I had to adjust my exposure a couple of time - it really grabs the light.
You made my day :)

Thank for the response and yes it does tend to overexpose 1/3.
Craig
Go to
Dec 21, 2014 21:20:28   #
I put my Tamzilla 150-600mm lens to a challenge of very low light.
Nikon D600 Tamron SP 150-600mm F/5-6.3 Di VC USD
The first shot is what my eyes could see Manual no flash 400mm ISO 1600 f/8 1/8 sec.
The second is Auto no flash 400mm ISO 1600 f/6 1.6 sec.
In both shots the AF (autofocus) was fast and accurate to focus on the powerlines.
Both shots are untouched except to convert from RAW to JPEG for this Forum.
I think the Lens & Camera really stepped up to the Challenge.
Craig

Eyes View

(Download)

Full Auto

(Download)
Go to
Dec 21, 2014 20:57:42   #
Regis wrote:
Sky was cloudy and slightly foggy. The Bald Eagle was about 125 feet in distance. Next week I will be using a new Nikon Laser Range Finder for exact distance. The 3 photos were shot at 600mm.


Great shots Regis, really nice.
Craig
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 ... 445 next>>
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.