Gtole wrote:
What do you want it to look like? You can play with various options in Lightroom or aperature
For full image, I guess I want a more natural color (more daylight-like).
Bill Houghton wrote:
Can you tell us what PP program you are using.
I have both Canon Digital Photo Professional which I'm very new user. And, I have Corel Draw/paint which I am very familiar with. Corel does not handle RAW. This is a .jpg but, I will shoot RAW in future.
Regis
I'm new at this and know I should have picked easier shot but,,,,,,.
Here is a night photo of a doe in my back yard (in subdivision). The street light actually has a yellow tint so, what you see is very close to what my eye sees. Often there are more deer and I think that I can get some great photo's but, don't know what to do with the light.
Should I try some other WB'ing or change somehow in post processing? I would like both, a silhouette and a full image shot if possible. First is shot that I am trying for and 2nd so you can see overall view
How can I fix this?
Appreciate any tips (for this old amature)
Regis
This is shot that I'm trying to improve
This is general area (deer is zoomed out)
All,
I really appreciate all the tips. And, I'll sure need to try the fiber optic idea.
Thanks again,
Regis
No, I am not using reflectors (yet). I'll have to try some experimenting there for sure. I light from dome-like cover with various backgrounds. Also like to back light gemstones with some diffused light.
Still very much amature though.
Thank you
Regis
steve48 wrote:
The focal length of a macro lens only affects the working distance from the object. Both can go to 1:1 magnification. If you need to be 6" from a stone with a 50mm lens, the 100mm will give you another 6" of working distance.
Are you using portable small reflectors to highlight facets on the gemstones? If you aren't you should be doing this in order to emphasize the 3D nature of the stone.
For my jewelry photography I use a light tent with 100wt daylight balanced fluorescent lights on either side. With a raised piece of frosted glass above colored paper or black velvet I can control shadows and background color.
The focal length of a macro lens only affects the ... (
show quote)
I currently have several satisfactory set-ups for jewelry but, am having difficulty with free standing highly polished faceted gemstones. I need to get a real macro lens and am curious what focal length has to do (e.i. 50, 60, or 100mm)? Is it just a matter of being far enough away to get ample light on the stone? Or, is there an advantage one way or the other? Lots of folk seem to use a 100mm macro for jewelry but, I do not know about photo's showing the facets on diamonds and other gemstones.
Also, because I have complete control of lighting, how important is the Fstop of the lens?
I have a Canon Xsi 450D
Thanks,
Regis
I surely did not know that. I "would" have leaned toward EF-s. If I upgrade in the future, I sure would like to take advantage of as much as possible that I currently accumulated.
Thanks,
Regis
saichiez wrote:
One consideration to put into the equation.....
Do you have any illusions (and I do consider it an illusion as opposed to a good idea) to moving into A Canon Full Frame camera, you should consider the extra expense of going with EF lenses instead of EF-s.
EF-s lenses will not give you the full capability of a full frame sensor if that is your upgrade path. They are crop factor lenses designed for the smaller APS sensor in most of the Canon mid level bodies.
However, If the budget and future plans preclude full frame for any reason, I would not shy from refurb or used lenses from good sellers. I will even consider an eBay seller and have often when they have lots of sales and feedback at least 99% positive. I will NOT buy from someone on eBay with 96, 97, 0r 98 % positive feedback.
Good sellers are KEH, B&H, Adorama. I shy from Amazon because most sales on Amazon are pass through sales from average sellers, and the feedback system on Amazon is not that great. I will by new from Amazon if Amazon is the actuall seller, direct to the buyer (you).
Just a couple of considerations.
On refurbs, stick with factory refurbs, not just seller refurbs. Remember that refurbs are checked out, perhaps repaired, and come with some warranty from the mfr. Seller refurb generally means, " Hey we took a picture with it and we recognize the subject shot" Stick with factory refurbs.
One consideration to put into the equation..... br... (
show quote)
When I started down this venture and joined this forum, I was welcomed and told that there was plenty of help for any questions.
I've found that is most correct.
Thank you all for responding with helpful for me.
Regis, in Nashville (where I wish I could find a real camera shop, like in the olden days[lol])
Majik Imaje,
Let me add my appreciation for your photographs and stories.
Thanks from way down in Tennessee.
Regis
Yep, I know that it is expensive hobby. But, learning what options & accessories are acually important and how everything functions is my main concern right now. First to build knowledge, then skill, then upgrade equipment. that's my plan.
Thanks,
Regis
Just getting my feet wet in DSLR and have a Canon XSi 450D with a Canon 28-80 F3.5-5.6 IV USM.
I would like to shoot some wildlife next month and looking for appropriate lens on very limited budget. I see a Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS II refurbished for sale at $129. Couple questions: are refurbished lens = to new? Any good or bad comments on the Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS II? (amazon folk rate it very high). I will probably also look for a 1.4 or 2.0 extender.
appreciate any tip or help on these.
Thanks,
Regis
100% agree. There is little or no creative talent and producers seem to have a dumb-down and purverted agenda. Consumers can not work easily through sponsors because networks pckage advertising deals so sponsor doesn't have much choice of programming. That's how network producers drive ther agenda.
SteveR wrote:
They don't call it the Golden Age of Television for nothing. Tell me...is there anything on today as good as Jackie Gleason, Lucy, Dean Martin, Ray Charles, the Saturday morning lineup, the shows that taught good over evil (westerns), Hitchcock, Twilight Zone, need I go on?
Screamin Scott wrote:
I realize that, but if you happened to see a deer 50 foot away, you would not be able to capture an image of it without first removing the tubes...With a standard macro lens without tubes, your depth of focus is not limited. You can shoot an insect at life size & simply turn the focus ring to focus on a subject much farther away....Can't do that if you have tubes on the lens. With tubes, changing the focus distance on the lens will change the magnification ratio somewhat, but nowhere near what the macro lens alone will...
I realize that, but if you happened to see a deer ... (
show quote)
Jumping in because I'm in a similar search and this helps my decision process a lot. I'm wanting to do both: outdoor macro, flowers, bugs, etc and indoor setup for gemstone details (where lighting is paramount). Seems that the tubes would be unnecessary expense on tight budget. Thanks, Regis
Just got first serious camera after years of point & shoot with only "snapshot" goals. Now with new cannon 450D XSi I want to capture the clarity and heart of subjects. I have most interest in macro as I cut gemstones and make jewelry but, am taken by the beauty in God's creations.
I will have questions as I am on a steep learning curve.
Thanks,
Regis