Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
Posts for: steffro1
Sep 12, 2014 08:21:03 #
We heloed up to Mendenhall Glacier in near Juneau 2 years ago. I had my 18-135 kit lens back then. Definitely go for the longer lens unless you just want the scenery!! We had to put up with dirty windows! lol!
Sep 9, 2014 17:23:57 #
Oh, just buy a Canon, all those other sports photographers can't be wrong. This coming from a happy Nikon junky! lol!
Sep 9, 2014 17:23:17 #
Oh, just buy a Canon, all those other sports photographers can't be wrong. This coming from a happy Nikon junky! lol!
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Sep 9, 2014 07:20:39 #
Sep 6, 2014 19:50:14 #
No offense taken, this my first attempt and wanted feedback! I learned from the experience. I probably applied it to a number of scene where it just didn't work. Trying to keep the foreground light enough without blowing out the clouds seems to be a challenge!! Thank!!
regards, Bob
regards, Bob
Don Schaeffer wrote:
Philskie
I hope you were not offended by my comment. The image looks really nice. Usually HDR has a kind of archival look that I like and I didn't see it here. That's all I meant. I didn't want to discourage or offend you.
--Don
I hope you were not offended by my comment. The image looks really nice. Usually HDR has a kind of archival look that I like and I didn't see it here. That's all I meant. I didn't want to discourage or offend you.
--Don
Sep 6, 2014 13:46:31 #
Does every tread have to be reduced to this?? Why can't you guys focus on the topic?
Sep 6, 2014 08:09:37 #
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Sep 3, 2014 12:27:42 #
You mean the first one right, the second is not HDR.
Don Schaeffer wrote:
In my opinion, the image is not HDR enough.
Sep 3, 2014 12:22:45 #
Thanks, I get some crazy file sizes with the 36 mp. I did some vertical panos that were outrageously large, 4x36!!
Bob
Bob
Meives wrote:
Bob, I pulled them both up in PHotoshop (windows tile) and had them side by side. HDR is much better. By the way, the original was 100 mb and HDR 2 mb. But that didn't hurt the color and brightness. David
Sep 3, 2014 12:20:20 #
Thanks for the comment, I did that same thing with the sky in a Grand Canyon shot. I darkened the sky in one image in CR and then layered it onto the original since the foreground would have been too dark. I am just trying to get a sense of when HDR works best. Since you always have the correct exposure shot to fall back on it is just a fun exercise.
Bob
Bob
fjrwillie wrote:
I do not profess to be a great photoperson. I use ... (show quote)
Sep 3, 2014 11:50:41 #
Thanks David, here is the shot in the middle.
Bob
[quote=Meives]
Bob
[quote=Meives]
steffro1 wrote:
I think your capture is outstanding. You can not get this smooth of light and dark without it. I think + - 3 EV is more than you need. I often use 2 EV. But it came out great. I would have liked to see the original without HDR too so I could campare. I use HDR a lot. David
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Sep 3, 2014 09:24:41 #
I think I will pretend that I never started this, since I got no help at all with the processing part.
Sep 2, 2014 18:23:14 #
No I wasn't I am kind of new to UHH.
Rongnongno wrote:
err...
Oh, you are aware that there is a HDR dedicated forum section on UHH?
Click on 'home'
Click on 'all sections'
Select the HDR one, you can even subscribe to it.
Oh, you are aware that there is a HDR dedicated forum section on UHH?
Click on 'home'
Click on 'all sections'
Select the HDR one, you can even subscribe to it.
Sep 2, 2014 18:15:56 #
Someone asked for it to be saved, so I did. I'll post the original in greater file size.
Rongnongno wrote:
Why the double post?
And the 'original' is rather small, don't you think?
And the 'original' is rather small, don't you think?
Larger file
Sep 2, 2014 18:07:20 #
Hi guys, I am new to HDR and did a lot of it (and vertical panos) on my vacation to the parks in Utah and Arizona last week. I was hoping to get some "constructive criticism" on this image. I can handle the negative to lean from it!! This is the three patriarchs at Zion NP. Did I go too far on anything. I am working in PS CS6 and this was three images at +/- 0.3 ev with a D800 and 24-120 lens. I stored the original here. I read the comments, just trying to figure out how not to overdo the clouds and still get the details in the rocks. Since I did three exposures I already have the correct one, I am just trying to learn here and see if HDR gives me something one exposure doesn't!
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.