Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jtipps
Page: <<prev 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 next>>
Feb 26, 2012 11:40:55   #
MT Shooter wrote:
Just wake up and see the pixels!! LOL


I am getting old, can't remember what I did earlier this morning and get confused easy.Did I mention I have a like new A1, I may use it. :)
Go to
Feb 26, 2012 10:54:48   #
Because of the flash cards and lens I think the D70 won out. Thank you all for your opinions. Funny how the answer was right in front of me and couldn't see it.

Opus wrote:
I have a D70 which I pretty much quit using once I got my D300. While in Yellowstone I used the D300 for wildlife and and the D70 for landscpaes. Made me wonder why I didn't use the D70 more. I would suggest using the D70 since both it and the D300 use compact flash cards.

jtipps wrote:
I started with a Nikon D 40 and then a D 70 and now a D300. I never used my D70 much before going to the 300. My question is when I go on a shoot which camera would you take for a 2nd? I know in many ways the D 70 is a better camera but the D40 is newer and has more technology. I shot some pretty nice pics with the D 40 so I am leaning toward it but wanted some different opinions and why. I am not only carrying it in case somethings happens to the D 300 but having it set up with a different lens and settings so I can change back and forth. Thanks in advance.
I started with a Nikon D 40 and then a D 70 and no... (show quote)
I have a D70 which I pretty much quit using once I... (show quote)
Go to
Feb 25, 2012 20:43:25   #
I haven't thought of that. If I sell them both then that would be a good option. Thank you.
Go to
Feb 25, 2012 20:42:31   #
That is exactly my thought. Thanks.

MT Shooter wrote:
Either one would make a good second body, but I think I would lean towards the D70 mainly for the lens compatibility. The D40 won't AF the non AF-S lenses, if you have any, and the D70 will.
Go to
Feb 25, 2012 18:39:06   #
I started with a Nikon D 40 and then a D 70 and now a D300. I never used my D70 much before going to the 300. My question is when I go on a shoot which camera would you take for a 2nd? I know in many ways the D 70 is a better camera but the D40 is newer and has more technology. I shot some pretty nice pics with the D 40 so I am leaning toward it but wanted some different opinions and why. I am not only carrying it in case somethings happens to the D 300 but having it set up with a different lens and settings so I can change back and forth. Thanks in advance.
Go to
Feb 25, 2012 13:29:21   #
It's your avitar. :-D
Go to
Feb 24, 2012 19:41:00   #
I'm beginning to understand why some of my friends have left this forum. They warned me about posting images.

Three wonderful images like these and you tell him they are not "tack shart"?? Sorry, I don't get it.
Go to
Feb 24, 2012 10:06:58   #
PWhisperer wrote:
photoshopmikey wrote:
Hi PWhisperer
Great shots, I am trying to do those shots, can you recommend a quality umbrella. How about the material should i go with satin?


I just use generic white lined umbrellas. Nuttin fancy or expensive. It's more about where u place the light and the intensity it's set at that matters most, not the brand of umbrella. The trick is confidence. You have to walk into any situation and tell yourself....oh yeah, I'm gonna get great shots today.

Too bad u aren't in my area. I will be holding some classes in mid march. Everything from lighting and posing to working with models.
quote=photoshopmikey Hi PWhisperer br Great shots... (show quote)


Jeff, what are the dates of your class? Did you get my e mail?
Go to
Feb 23, 2012 19:50:12   #
SQUIRL033 wrote:
well, lemme see... i've got literally GIGAbytes of bird photos, so i'll throw in a few of those...


Beautiful images!
Go to
Feb 23, 2012 19:29:26   #
Great shot!
Go to
Feb 23, 2012 12:03:07   #
Forgot to ask, in #3 she is standing, correct? I also use shadows a lot in my portraits, I personally think it adds a lot to certain ones.
Go to
Feb 23, 2012 12:00:42   #
They are all good but I really like #3 of the first set. Lighting and pose are perfect, love the single beautiful eye. Good job.
Go to
Feb 23, 2012 11:16:45   #
Thank you. Sort of in the wild. They are at a park and somewhat used to people. I moved to about 15" away as they got out of the water and stayed still and they came up and layed down almost at my feet.
Go to
Feb 22, 2012 20:48:19   #
cjkorb wrote:
Do any of you people writing in remember some classic/muscle cars you owned back in the day? My wife had a 69 Firebird 350 cu. in. I had a 73 Javlin, I'll post some pics as soon as I can dig them up.


I had a '58 black impala 2 door coupe, 3 speed, 348 315 HP 3-2's, cam, and solid lifter from the factory. Pretty fast for a huge ole car, beat a lot of 300HP 327's to their surprise.
Go to
Feb 22, 2012 20:42:21   #
jkm757 wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
Sdaupanner wrote:
I think it was a full sized my uncle owned a 1966 Olds 442 does any body remember what the 4-4-2 signified.


4 barrel carb, 4 speed tranny and Bucket (2) seats. But it still wasn't full size. It was over 2 feet shorter and 800 pounds lighter than the Full Size Delta 88 in 1967.


That would be 4 barrel carb, 4 speed manual transmission and duel(2) exhaust.


You are correct, wasn't going to say anything but you are right.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.