capmike wrote:
I just was with my daughter to attend my grandson’s graduation. I didn’t take many photos, but my daughter did. Not a great camera, but good enough for snapshots. While reviewing her photos, she asked me a question I not only couldn’t answer, but would love to have answered for myself: Why, when taking the same photo, seconds or less apart, is one photo more underexposed than the next? No change in settings, no change in light, yet the two photos are noticeably different. She’s using an old Canon, I’m using a Z9, and it happens to both of us. Would love to hear anyone’s thoughts.
Thanks,
Mike
I just was with my daughter to attend my grandson’... (
show quote)
I had the same thing happen to me Fri. night. I went out to shoot the full moon, had my DSLR set on a tripod and used remote to activate the shutter and I consistently had either a soft golden-tinged moon or straight-up white moon and I changed nothing on the camera.