Ignore it. We're all lost on this comment.

You're welcome, but not all the advice is great. I just don't want to start an argument with anybody.

Once you get on track with it, negs usually are better to scan because they're first generation imagery. Scanning prints is easier, in my experience. There's no need to scan prints at 600 dpi unless you want to make enlarged prints, but I'm sure others may have a different opinion.

I hear ya, but there are a lot of factors behind such a statement. My Panasonic GX7 has a problem with the EVF that took me half a year to solve. Deep in the menus there's a choice to adjust the color, brightness, contrast, etc. for the LCD. Couldn't find a similar choice for the EVF. Then I put my eye up to the EVF and the menu changed to adjust EVF. Ah! Now you have to peer through the EVF to adjust those things, and it was way off. Finally got it dialed in to where it looked like the scene in front of me. It wasn't easy fumbling with those buttons and wheels while I held the thing to my eye, but it's good now. If you take your eye out of the EVF, you're suddenly back to adjusting the LCD.

I don't know about the financial results, but I lived there then and the rush hour traffic snarls completely vanished! Everybody adjusted their schedule because of apprehension that traffic would be terrible. That prompted the powers that be to encourage flex hours for businesses. It didn't work.

Gee, do ya think?

Not sure about that. I photographed my ex-wife's entire family on Halloween with my 1899 Graflex.

That's what WF told you. I seriously doubt it's true.

Sure. Wells Fargo is a criminal entity. Look up WF news concerning opening accounts nobody wants on Google. What I can't believe is doing business with them after about 1985. Don't believe what they told you about Visa; they're a straight-arrow company. There's a 99% chance Wells Fargo sold you out a second time.

I agree. Some broadcasters have sold their souls to this company. They work the RF pitch into their talkfest without missing a beat. I'd never consider their product for two reasons. A huge percentage of their revenues goes into marketing, and they don't disclose anything about the product. It's probably a scam, so one day soon they'll probably evaporate, leaving some media companies holding the bag.

I second that notion. It's a winner!

I feel your pain. It reminds me of my days in the socialist seminary (university). Words, words, words. Once I got outta there I really started learning stuff.

Sure, and that's fine. I made no reference to agreement/disagreement. What's annoying is when the infinitesimal differences in definitions go on and on and on . . . .

And the Graflex reflex camera was introduced in 1899.

Welcome to the semantics and nit-picking forum.