Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: rizibat8
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 next>>
Jul 7, 2015 17:57:39   #
JimH123 wrote:
I find that when I open two windows, and download the SX50 in one window and the P900 in the other window, and then click on both images so that they blow up even bigger, I find that the P900 is actually quite superior to the SX50.

When blown up real large, the SX50 has a look that is like looking through frosted glass and the edges aren't real sharp. The P900 does not have that effect at all and the edges do remain sharp.

Would be interesting to now know which one has the best image stabilization.
I find that when I open two windows, and download ... (show quote)


I've found that in a non-zoom situation, there is not a lot of difference in the IS, however, in zoom mode, the double price tag of the P900 starts to show as it does also in the image quality whether in zoom or not. As a Canon guy, it hurts me to the heart to admit what all other tests show... that Nikon (apples to apples) has a better image quality. I'm anxious to see the new 5D's images and how they stack up against the high end Nikons although it may give me a severe gas attack.
Larry
Go to
Jul 7, 2015 16:41:51   #
MontanaTrace wrote:
I just bought a Canon SX60. I'm having a good time with it. Love the in-camera HDR. Seldom use the full 65X but glad it's in the arsenal.


I had the SX60 for a short while but I let a friend talk me out of it since I was already used to the 50. Kinda wish I had waited a while before I let it go. I recommend that you wait for a while and let the new wear off the P900 enough for the price to fall a bit or refurbs to start showing up and grab one. I've never dabbled in time lapse before but I think I'll give it a try now.
Go to
Jul 7, 2015 16:35:08   #
Speedy wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: Thanks for sharing. I own a X50 and love it . I am still learning what it will do.


Hello again Speedy. I've had the 50 over a year and I'm still learning as well. I've found that exposure is everything when it comes to IQ with the SX50. Once you get that right, you can get pretty close to a good dslr.
Larry
Go to
Jul 7, 2015 13:58:43   #
Wahawk wrote:
The SX50 and P900 images are soft PRIMARILY because the OP was using FULL DIGITAL zoom!! Better test would be at full OPTICAL zoom


Please go back and see the earlier post showing the same think at full optical. For some reason it didn't make the newsletter posts but it's out there.
Thanks,
Larry
Go to
Jul 7, 2015 13:57:05   #
JimH123 wrote:
Both the SX50 and P900 images look rather soft. Both should be able to do better. But just looking at the full sized image doesn't tell the whole story. When you enlarge the image, you can see how it preserves the detail. But be aware that the tiny sensors in bridge cameras don't do well in such a test. This is where the 6D will totally blow the bridge cameras out of the water.


Hi Jim, did you see the earlier post with the optical zoom? I wish the Sun had helped me out this weekend but to be honest I got about what I expected under the circumstances. Of course, since the digital zoom is nothing more than a crop, things go south fast.
Thanks for the response,
Larry
Go to
Jul 7, 2015 13:47:17   #
MontanaTrace wrote:
You are comparing a 50X against a 83X. As far as crisp focus, the Canon shot has the vent and lines of the asphalt shingle roof. Looks good. The Nikon vent looks good. Would guess the roof would look good too. Both get high marks for what they are.

Price: SX50 refurb from Canon $179. Nikon P900? I can't find a refurb. New, $569.


I agree and plan to hang on to both. The only thing I regret is that I don't live where you do so that I could take full advantage of both. Thanks for your response.
Larry
Go to
Jul 7, 2015 13:36:20   #
lone ranger wrote:
I'm talking macro, not zoom.....its totally different


Lone Ranger, I think he was talking to me. I took your advise and have ordered the macro filter. Thanks for the tip.
Larry
Go to
Jul 7, 2015 13:32:53   #
Michael Hartley wrote:
The Nikon has a longer zoom range, what were you expecting?

Dear Michael, The original post was a response to a number of members that were struggling with the decision of whether to buy one or the other of these cameras. Since I have both, I offered to post an example of both full optical and full digital examples for the purpose of comparing the image quality. After a strong response in the affirmative, I posted this and one other with the full digital.
I think we all know that "83" is bigger than "50", however, for this test it's a moot point.
As to what did I expect... I expected at least one snide post from someone who came into the conversation in the middle and felt compelled to interject their wisdom. Thank you for taking care of this for me.
Larry
Go to
Jul 7, 2015 05:57:59   #
lone ranger wrote:
I think the P900 truly is wonderful, as I own one as well, and I"m so looking forward, to taking it on my up comong cruise, and being able to get shots, of ships off in the distance, and other foreign items, on passing Islands that I could not capture before, thanks to the super zoom capabilities of that 2000MM zoom..

I've only had mine for a couple of weeks so I'm still learning what it will do. Totally impressed with what I've learned so far.
Go to
Jul 6, 2015 17:04:48   #
Part 2:
Here are a few of the differences in the 2 cameras:

Pros of Canon SX50:
Smaller and considerably lighter.
Shoots in RAW.
Quite a bit less expensive.
Super slow motion (capture a golf swing and find out why your game sucks)
Pretty good (not great) IS system.

Pros of Nikon P900:
Better image quality in my opinion.
Viewer sensor - automatically switches from live view when you want to use the viewer.
Time lapse and more choices in Scene mode.
Good IS system.

Both are great bridge cameras and I plan to keep both as backup to the 6D... of course unless something new comes out that I can blow $s on.
Hope this helps.
Larry

Full digital of SX50

(Download)

Full digital of P900

(Download)

Canon 6D with Sigma 500mm for grins

(Download)
Go to
Jul 6, 2015 16:29:26   #
As promised, here is the test of the above mentioned. Unfortunately the weather was not working with me so I did the best I could. The target is a vent stack atop a house located about a half block from my position. I will make a few comments on the observations I made on the next posting showing the full digital zoom comparison regarding the pros and cons of each camera.
Larry

Target - roof vent stack 2 houses down

(Download)

SX50 at full optical zoom

(Download)

P900 at full optical zoom

(Download)
Go to
Jul 4, 2015 12:54:28   #
rdgreenwood wrote:
The embarrassing thing is that turning VR off when you're working from a tripod is something I stress in my opening for my evening course. Oh well, thanx for understanding.


Your avatar is difficult for me to look at although it's a beautiful cat. I had to have Murphy, my orange tabby, put to sleep yesterday. Hardest thing I've ever had to do.
Go to
Jul 4, 2015 12:17:31   #
rdgreenwood wrote:
You're absolutely correct. I apologize. I had a brain fart and overlooked the VR/tripod interplay. As always, VR should be turned off when the camera is on a tripod. Mea culpa....


All is forgiven... actually I learned that from the gurus hear at UHH.
Go to
Jul 4, 2015 12:16:07   #
rjaywallace wrote:
Rizibat8, I recently purchased an SX50 refurb from Canon and would be highly interested to see the result of your proposed comparison. So far I've been very pleased with the camera.


It's a great lightweight camera Jay. Even thought I have the big gun P900, the SX50 is the camera that I have with me at all times. I even had the SX60 at one time and sold it because I liked the 50 better.
By the way, is that you in disguise playing the guitar. Nice picture.
Larry
Go to
Jul 4, 2015 11:47:58   #
When the camera is on a tripod and the shutter is delayed, the camera is as still as it can be. Image stabilization is an active adjustment to focus and could be in process during the snap, possibly causing an element of vibration. If the camera is as focused on a still subject as it can be, you don't want to introduce anything that could change that.
Thanks for your response.
Larry
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.