bajadreamer wrote:
My vote is Sage Thrasher. Common in Eastern Oregon. On the 2nd view you can see a hint of orange on the vent/belly area.
Thanks bajadreamer, I think you have it. I have not heard about this bird before. It is always fun to learn something new. I listened to the song and have heard it before in the spring but did not know what bird it belonged to. Now I do!
rwilson1942 wrote:
I can't pin down the thrush either. The strong spots remind me of a wood thrush but they are an eastern species not normally found in the west, but there are isolated sightings.
When I tried to ID the thrush, I thought it looked like a wood thrush as well. It does not seem to resemble any thrush commonly found in Oregon. That is unless it is a juvenile. This shot was taken in very open sage country.
Cwilson341 wrote:
I can't help with IDs but these are certainly sharp shots. Very nice.
Cwilson341, thanks for viewing and the comment.
imagemeister wrote:
I think you are right about the duck ......the second looks like a thrush to me - not sure which one though.
Nice work.
Thanks imagemeister. You are right, it does look like a thrush.
The first one is a duck I captured in Central Oregon. My best guess is a juvenile Ring-Necked duck.
The second bird was shot in Eastern Oregon. It looks somewhat like a juvenile Western Meadow Lark to me but I was hoping for some clarification from those who know birds better than I.
sailorsmom wrote:
Nice images, fallriverguy!
Than you very much sailorsmom.
Photo Girl wrote:
Great shots!
Thank you for viewing and the nice comment Photo Girl.
bigtex2000 wrote:
Very Nice #2 .....all are well done...but the 1st windmill shot for me is the cream of the crop!!!
Thank you for viewing and your comments. I go back and forth on which one I like most.
crafterwantabe wrote:
Great pictures...
Thank you crafterwantabe.
catalint wrote:
Very nice
You've done as I wanted to do so, the only difference : You did it :D
Well done and thumbs up from me
Cheers
C.
Thank you catalint, I appreciate your comments.
Martys wrote:
Very nicely done, wonderful work.
Any camera settings and focus on data for those of us who got lesser quality results.
How far away was the silhouetted tower?
Thanks for sharing and keep up the stellar work.
Marty
Marty, thanks for looking and for the questions. I have updated the post to try and provide the information you were asking about.
The forecast was for clouds and rain on last Sunday and Monday so I took my best shot Saturday with an almost super full moon. My wife and I were staying at a remote hot springs in eastern Oregon for the weekend. There were a few clouds but thankfully it was mostly clear.
All shots were taken with a D7100 and Tamron 70-300. The shots were all hand help. I have learned that even with image stabilization I get sharper pictures by staying at or above 1/500. All but the last shot the camera was set on manual at 1/500 and auto-iso. The last shot was full manual mode.
The tower was about 200 feet in front of me. I used autofocus (back button focus) using the horizon to focus for the moon and set metering to spot to expose for the moon.
Camera setting for each shot:
1. 1/500, f7.1, iso 450
2. 1/500, f9.0, iso 2000
3. 1/500, f9.0, iso 640
4. 1/500, f9.0, iso 800
5. 1/800, f9.0, iso 320
The moon just clearing the horizon
(
Download)
The moon my an old windmill tower.
(
Download)
A zoomed shot of the moon and tower.
(
Download)
Last one with the moon on top of the tower.
(
Download)
The sky cleared later in the evening for a straight up shot.
(
Download)
I always enjoy your postsvery mush. Thank you for sharing!