Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: onetimeduck
Page: <<prev 1 2 3
Apr 24, 2016 10:33:35   #
I think it for lifting the cover of a water main shut off valve in the yard. The square wrench would turn the valve.
Go to
Nov 14, 2015 11:31:07   #
The Sigmas are excellent. If you want to go even wider than the 19mm, which is 28mm on the crop, the Rokinon 12mm makes a great 18mm on the crop sensor of the a6000.
Go to
Nov 5, 2015 08:17:07   #
You can get a Rokinon 12mm in E mount f2 that is very sharp. It is a manual lens but at 12mm almost everything is at infinity. It will run you $320 or so. The Sigma 19mm/f2.8 is only $200 or thereabouts.
Go to
Sep 11, 2015 08:37:58   #
NormanHarley wrote:
I left the world for about 4 years after we lost my wife. Started struggling back towards the world with lots of help and met my blondie at about the 5 year mark. Taking up photography again has given me one more thing to wake up to and enjoy every day. I am still madly in love with my wife, miss her every day in this life without her by my side. But now my life is once again busy and good. We ain't dead yet!


Been there, brother, and it is a struggle many times, but you're right about photography helping you out the door. It has gotten me to places I never would have gone. One of the downsides is that it can be a terrible temptation to buy more gear than you can carry.
Go to
Sep 3, 2015 07:47:06   #
Sorry, duh. If it was on the mirror it wouldn't be in the picture.
Go to
Sep 3, 2015 07:42:45   #
Are you sure it's not on the mirror?
Go to
Dec 11, 2014 19:49:56   #
DirtFarmer wrote:
I just tried it out on LR 5.7 and it gives me an exclamation point instead of a question mark. The question mark may have been what you got in an earlier version of LR since it's what I remember seeing. But then it might just be my failing memory.

Anyway in LR 5.7 hovering over the exclamation point gives you the message "photo is missing". Clicking on it gives you a message "xxxx can't be used because the file can't be found. Do you want to locate it?"

There's a "locate" button at the bottom of the message dialog. click on that. You will get a file explorer (in Windows) dialog that you can use to navigate to the appropriate folder. In that folder, click on the appropriate file (the file name you're looking for is displayed at the top of the dialog). Double clicking on that should do the trick.

The process might be a little different on a Mac. Or on an older version of LR.
I just tried it out on LR 5.7 and it gives me an e... (show quote)


Thank you, DirtFarmer. I think maybe we at least figured out what went wrong. If I have to do that for 5000 images though, I think I'd rather delete LR and reinstall it, update it to 5.7 and then re-import and let LightRoom build a new catalog.
Go to
Dec 11, 2014 18:13:27   #
DirtFarmer wrote:
Sounds like you moved the files without consulting Lightroom. So it doesn't know where to find them. Then you tried to import them but they're already in the catalog.

Since they're in the catalog, the Library module should show you a bunch of images (if there are still previews available) or just blank spots (if the previews have expired). There should be a question mark by them. That means Lightroom doesn't know where to look for them.

Click on the question mark on one of the photos and Lightroom will give you a dialog in which you can navigate to the new folder. That will tell LR where that picture is. If that folder has other pictures that LR can't find, that process for the one picture will find all of them.

If you do that for a picture in the root folder of the new location it should be able to find all the pictures in a minimum of searches.

If you have really borked your catalog, you have two options. (1) use a backup catalog (I presume you do allow LR to backup your catalogs regularly, right?) or (2) start a new catalog and import everything. The second option will be a large chore if you have a lot of pictures.
Sounds like you moved the files without consulting... (show quote)


I have backup catalogs but that would be to revert to an old, disorganized state which is what I was trying to avoid. I see the question marks you spoke of now and I'm going to try "find the missing folders". I suppose what I need to do it chose "merge"?
Go to
Dec 11, 2014 17:42:39   #
bsprague wrote:
What did you use to create the folder? How did you move the images into that folder? From your description, you have already imported the photos. The "problem" may only be that you are not looking for them the right way in the Library module.


I think you are right. I can see all the images, it is just that some of them are grayed out. I'll keep working at it. Thanks for your help. I have a sneaky suspicion that if I were smart enough to define the problem intelligently, I'd know the answer.
Go to
Dec 11, 2014 16:59:35   #
bsprague wrote:
Can you define "snarl" and "reestablish" with a little more detail?

FWIW, Lightroom won't see anything until you go though the Import process and tell it where to look.

Best advice on this forum is to play with a half dozen photos until you get the hang of it.


I created a "Lightroom" folder inside the Pictures folder and moved all my images into it. I can now see all my files under "New Files" but most of them are greyed out with the message, "This appears to be a duplicate of a file already in catalog". I can't work on them while they are grayed out.
Go to
Dec 11, 2014 16:27:32   #
I have somehow managed to snarl the works in lightroom 5.7 beyond use. Does anyone know how to reestablish the catalog. I took Kelby's advice and created a "Lightroom" folder inside the "Pictures" folder but Lightroom doesn't see it. Must I delete and reinstall Lightroom or is there an easier way? Thank you in advance. I'm using windows 8.1 if that has any bearing.
Go to
Nov 6, 2013 08:48:43   #
Wow!! This article has nuggets of wisdom at every turn. I will be reading more of her blogs. Thank you Nightski and Captain C for bringing her to my attention. Makes me think that there may be hope for a new generation after all.
Go to
Oct 22, 2013 21:30:49   #
Jackdoor wrote:
I've an OMD-5 and D800. 90% of the time I use the M4/3, unless in low light or need a very wide angle. Please check out Olympus before you get Lumix! The operating system is just wonderful...


Which Oly? I have been researching the GH3. I'm still very much undecided and want to get this right. Do you know if the lumix and Oly interchange with each other?
Go to
Oct 22, 2013 10:59:57   #
Delderby wrote:
Equipment used is, for me, always of interest. I list my G2 in order to indicate my preference for 4/3 format - the format of the future - when all you Nikon and Canon owners will have to ditch your equipment, or be considered old hat! Perhaps this would be worth a topic of it's own? I reckon we are all members of the wooden spoon - great isn't it.?


Right now I shoot FF but I'm looking into 43s. I'm still trying to figure out which lumix does what. There must be dozens of them.
Go to
Oct 10, 2013 08:46:18   #
Beautiful Makes me want to run out and buy kite and start practicing . But, of course, Im sure this ain't his first rodeo.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.