Aardvark said, "In other words, it's a birth defect, not normal. The exception that proves the norm."

Extreme exception suggest that there are exceptions between norms and extremes. Human and animal and plant's all have long stranded genetic codes and they get scrambled. Indeed looking at a statistical curve the norm is the center-most high value.

We men accept bisexual women comfortably, and enjoy them, 2 by 2, in our king-size beds. But many men, especially the insecure in their maleness, become disturbed in the every day work place when dealing with the presents of an effeminate male. Better that men shrugging our shoulders with no reaction, accepting what is as what is.

Again a post with reference but no personal interpretation by Racmanaz except for politicized vulgar 7th grade bad boy title.

Dr. Grossman bickers about Conception vs Birth assignment of gender. Of course it is not at conception, but shortly there after... and there are genetic "between" individuals. She argues IMO correctly that the child's plumbing should not be altered and is a decision they may make, conservatively speaking, after maturing to the point they can buy beer, an AR-15 and vote.

In many countries males who chose to be feminized in dress and action are condemned by religion and it follows by political go alongs needing conventional peoples vote. There are however countries that accept transgender individuals with a shrug of the shoulders. I was surprised at this acceptance when living in Argentina, when in a cosmetic shop with my lady with female plumbing, I viewed a tall beautify that required a double take to realize that she was a male dressed and cosmetically looking like a beautiful woman~! Betweens are accepted as being part of society. Humorously we can refer to comic movies by "Devine" an American actor, singer, and drag queen; humor because it is so not-norm in our society. Presently, "175 countries and locations experienced increases in acceptance <of LGBTI since 1980."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_(performer)
https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/global-acceptance-index-lgbt/

Many conservative are outspoken because they live in a closet fearing exposure, even to themselves. Liberals, accept the reality with the shrug of the shoulders. Gender insecure refer to them as "Commie lefturds" .... what does Communism have to do with the subject? Why resort to making comments comparing liberal thinkers as "Turds." That is 7th grade bullies thinking and ability to discuss.

No mention was made of "Intersex is a group of conditions in which there is a discrepancy between the external genitals and the internal genitals (the testes and ovaries). The older term for this condition is hermaphroditism. Increasingly, this group of conditions is being called disorders of sex development (DSDs)." The genetic cards are not dealt with clear definition. To make it simple for many conservative thinkers, analogy, Hybrid Cars, both ICE and Electric.
https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/001669.htm

The subject is complex and so limited by religious social thinking. In the world it is a Taboo to accept.

Really???? Are the Crusades STILL going on? Tell us all about it. There are some violent fringe groups in most religions. Why doesn't anyone on the Left EVER mention the Muslims any more. Talk about your violent religious groups and they should be number 1 on anybody's list. Yet the Left NEVER mentions Muslims at all when discussing violent religious groups. It is always Christians as if our federal government is attempting over time to make it SEEM as if Christians really are violent as a group rather than perhaps a very minor few who might commit a violent act.

Even your hero, Obama, refused to EVER name Muslims when it was perfectly clear that they had been part of a group slaughtering Americans. Must be his Muslim roots sticking up for his relatives.

Dennis

I am certainly no expert but to my understanding sexual preference (same sex preference is commonly referred to as homosexuality) is different than gender dysphoria. I recognize some confusion as the LGBT community seems to lump themselves together as an aggrieved group but to my mind quite different. Although they do differ in ideology and levels of tolerance and understanding at times as is evidenced by a number of pro women lesbian advocates strongly opposing biological men competing against women on the sporting field (possibly depriving women of title 9 athletic scholarships.

Despite years of Biden family and media disinformation, we are finally learning that President Joe Biden really did fire Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin for looking into state corruption involving the oil company Burisma and his son Hunter Biden—and ultimately Joe Biden himself.

As vice president, Biden, in his own words, bragged that he had threatened to cancel the deliverance of American foreign aid to Ukraine unless Shokin was dismissed.

So what is Congress to do now—unimpeach and exonerate an innocently impeached Donald Trump, and instead impeach a guilty Biden for essentially the same allegations?

After all, the Left redefined the impeachment bar in 2019 as leveraging foreign aid to Ukraine to benefit one’s political career.

And that is exactly what Joe Biden did to ensure his son could continue to raise millions for the Biden family with foreign governments, while being shielded from political consequences.

An impeached Trump also was accused of using the power of government to go after his likely 2020 presidential rival by suggesting that Joe Biden and his family were corrupt and should be investigated by Ukrainian officials for fraud and bribery.

Despite Joe Biden’s denials, Trump was right: There was plenty of evidence to link unwarranted Ukrainian payoffs going into Biden family coffers.

So Trump in 2019 had good reasons to ensure that none of the Bidens was still burrowed deeply into the Ukrainian payoff machine.

In contrast, Biden had far less grounds to unleash the full powers of government against his probable 2024 rival, Trump.

Special prosector Jack Smith is not charging Trump with bribery of the Biden sort. He does not allege that Trump gave special foreign policy preferences to those foreigners who paid his family for such services.

Instead, Smith argues that Trump unlawfully removed classified presidential papers—although Joe Biden did nearly the same.

Biden kept quiet about his vast removal of classified documents for over a decade. Not until Trump was being investigated did Biden suddenly notify the government of his illegal removals.

In contrast, a combative and boisterous Trump fought openly and constantly with federal archivists over which of his papers at his Mar-a-Lago estate were truly classified.

Prosecutorial leaks floated all sorts of unproven nefarious agendas that had prompted Trump’s disputes over his presidential papers.

But no one to this day has seriously asked why—first as senator and then as vice president—Biden secretly and weirdly removed and kept such sensitive material for years.

Recent reports allege that Hunter Biden may have been treated with kid gloves by prosecutors, partly because Hunter’s lawyers had threatened otherwise to call Joe Biden to the stand as a favorable witness.

Government prosecutors under pressure from the White House apparently balked at the nightmare of a befuddled president of the United States testifying under oath about the supposed innocence of the very guilty Hunter Biden.

In truth, the former drug addict Hunter has played lots of such strange games with his own family.

In his laptop communications, Hunter whined that no one in the family appreciated his hard work at family grifting.

He sounded petulant that his father forced him to fork over half his income to the Joe and Jill Biden household.

At a time of universal scrutiny of Hunter, the last thing any sane first son might do would be to hawk his own childish paintings at exorbitant prices to those wishing to buy influence with his father the president.

In effect, Hunter was almost daring the White House to stop his blatant grifting artistry.

Instead, the Bidens moved Hunter into the White House, apparently to keep him under closer watch.

Hunter is still out of control. He could take the family down with him unless President Biden continues to shield him from prosecution.

Ironically, the double standard used by Biden and the media to hound Trump has only raised new questions of fairness.

Why had the Biden family—with its far greater legal exposure—never faced such serial indictments?

A Republican House of Representatives had ended prior Democratic protection given to the Bidens.

And the Ukraine-Russia war has again turned attention to the Biden-Burisma connection and Hunter’s shaking down of Ukrainian officials.

Finally, Joe Biden can no longer work a full day. He mutters. He stumbles. He serially lies.

He hijacks solemn occasions commemorating national tragedies by trying to one-up the grieving with his own self-absorbed stories—most of them irrelevant and narcissistic half-truths.

If a cognitively and criminally challenged Biden cannot finish his term, we will finally learn the full story of 15 years of Biden family corruption.

The Bidens will lose the only impediment—Joe Biden’s political machinations—left in the way of an honest, full-blown felony investigation into what is likely the most corrupt presidential family in American history.