Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Pilot
Page: <<prev 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 next>>
Feb 21, 2014 00:03:45   #
Pepper wrote:
I guess it just depends on ones perspective. I fail to see the difference if one chooses to go on line and listen to someone in a You Tube video or someone going on line and listen to someone on a blog. One takes no more effort than the other. What’s the difference in reading what someone has to say on one site vs another? If I’m reading what difference does it make if I’m reading text on a piece of paper or in a post on a forum? You say if they don’t have the basics then their questions can’t be answered but then you go on to say they really can be answered by someone who wrote a book. So they can be answered you just don’t think we should answer them here? From my point of view I see the newbie coming here to do research and to me the big difference is that here the newbie can ask follow up questions as many answers can lead to more questions. Reading a manual, while good for some is only tedium to others, some enjoy the interaction they find here not found in a dry manual. Why not just allow folks to learn at their pace using whatever approach brings them joy? This is supposed to be fun so let them have fun and if you don’t like the approach they’ve chosen just ignore them. If enough folks were to ignore them they’ll find a new approach. I guess what I’m saying in a long winded fashion is why not just allow people to do life on their own terms. What worked or works for you may only bring frustration to others.
I guess it just depends on ones perspective. I fai... (show quote)


Everyone has a preferred way of learning and as far as I'm concerned you're right about the tedium of reading instructional manuals. Sometimes I feel like those who write the manuals found 'in the box' are more interested in
trying to impress their peers with their writing skills than they are in educating the learner. Personally I have more luck using the hands on, trial and error method of learning. As for the moon, even with the trial and error method I've had little luck when using the long lenses and a Canon 60D or the 70D. However, I've had exceptional results (tack sharp shots) using the Canon SX50. So much so that I've grown tired of shooting the moon.
Go to
Feb 18, 2014 12:04:08   #
Lee Thomas wrote:
Hmmmm. I am puzzled as to why the data would not show up . Here is what it should look like under "Additional Information" for the first photo in the set. Show more (click on the "show more"




Additional info (show less)
Settings: 1/20 ƒ/5 ISO 1250 20.4 mm


I didn't have any trouble seeing the settings. Clicked on the one I wanted to check, then scrolled down to Additional info and clicked on (show more).
Go to
Feb 10, 2014 12:33:14   #
barbedwire wrote:
Awesome shots!!! They say that if you are a metal detector fan, the best place to start looking is where the clothesline might of been. Whether that's true or not I'm not sure, but it would be fun to find out. That's if you have permission to look on the property. :D


Back in the old days folks didn't trust banks all that much and they would hide their money in the walls of their homes. Might want to look there too.
Go to
Feb 9, 2014 23:19:23   #
Wullie wrote:
Makes me wonder what happened.


It has to be Bush's fault! Great shots.
Go to
Feb 8, 2014 16:53:32   #
Fudge Ripple? How in the world could anyone hate Fudge Ripple?
Go to
Feb 8, 2014 12:25:30   #
The next thing you know these 'concerned' educators (the ones who have been educated well beyond their level of intelligence) will want to outlaw candy canes at Christmas.
Go to
Feb 6, 2014 12:23:34   #
cee pee wrote:
I'm considering purchasing a Canon SX50HS. Has anyone had experience with this camera and where to get the best price. Thank you.


B&H Photo has them listed at $359.00. Rumor has it that Canon may be coming out with the SX60HS. The SX50HS is a great bridge camera.
Go to
Feb 4, 2014 13:00:07   #
James56 wrote:
20 ounces.


Thank you!
Go to
Feb 4, 2014 12:14:57   #
James56 wrote:
Surprisingly Kodak seems to be the current front runner with their new camera in the superzoom field (as far as reach goes anyway)...

http://www.ephotozine.com/article/kodak-releases-details-on-az651-23827


Any idea what 567g equates to in lbs. and ozs?
Go to
Jan 30, 2014 16:25:02   #
Billbobboy42 wrote:
I want a clear filter to protect the lens on my new Tamron. There are two brands that I am looking at: B&W and Hoya. B&W uses "Schott" glass, while Hoya uses optical quality glass with no glass brand name stated.

Both brands have 3 filter choices for the lens size, but in reading the specs (on B&H website) I can't really tell any significant differences within each brand's 3 choices.

With dozens of brands of filters, I'm not going further into them, so will make the choice between the above.

I would appreciate thoughts on choosing between the two.

Thanks

Bill
I want a clear filter to protect the lens on my ne... (show quote)


If you're just looking for a filter (UV) to protect your lens go with the cheaper of the two...Hoya.
Go to
Jan 26, 2014 23:09:25   #
Manglesphoto wrote:
Could care less!!!


I could care less, therefore I will. Now that I did,
I couldn't care less. Unless of course I didn't care
less enough. In that case I'll continue caring less
until I can't care less.
Go to
Jan 26, 2014 22:52:22   #
Busby wrote:
I am also going to Africa in April 2014 and have similar questions. With a weight limit of 33 pounds, How to maximize?
I plan to take Nikon D600 and 5100 body as back up...have a Tamron 18-270...my walkaround....love it. A friend suggested renting the new Tamron 150-600...I already own a 150-500 but the weight and size seem prohibitive. Am I better off buying a teleconverter for the 18-270 or taking one or the other Tamrons?

I am really concerned about the weight limit....33 pounds for everything..photo gear and clothes..personal items etc.

What would you do?
I am also going to Africa in April 2014 and have s... (show quote)


I have the Tamron 18-270 and use it as my walkaround too. Great lens. However, I did not know you could buy a teleconverter for it.
Go to
Jan 26, 2014 16:11:25   #
tainkc wrote:
Yes, there were that many birds at the park.


Swope Park?
Go to
Jan 21, 2014 14:01:31   #
Pixelpixie88 wrote:
They are two different birds. Similar, but different. The link here gives a good explanation of the differences.

http://www.ehow.com/info_8173486_difference-between-bohemian-cedar-waxwings.html


Thanks PP88. Your info shows that what I have thought to be Cedars in Kansas are actually Bohemian. I really appreciate your time.
Go to
Jan 21, 2014 13:24:05   #
Pixelpixie88 wrote:
We are lucky to have these colorful birds here in the winter.


Are Bohemian Waxwings the same as Cedar Waxwings?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.