Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: whatdat
Page: <<prev 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 156 next>>
Oct 18, 2023 10:03:21   #
JohnSwanda wrote:
I don't understand why people continue to go to brick and mortar pharmacies when you can get prescriptions by mail.


My pharmacist keeps an eye out for his customers; such as when there might be an interaction between meds or a better generic version. Only a 15 minute drive away.
Go to
Oct 18, 2023 09:47:35   #
Hip Coyote wrote:
I wasnt the one who was concerned about the duplicate posting, didnt comment on it, didnt try to correct the OP and dont try to police this site. I was simply pointing out that the site is left up to self appointed monitors, it is a mess...a real moderator would be helpful in so many ways. Freeze postings when they go off track, etc.


“Freeze postings…”. Sounds too much like censorship which leaves too much up to the censor’s whims.
Go to
Oct 17, 2023 23:43:16   #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Weathersealed, and on a superzoom bridge camera I would take that with a grain of salt. There’s only so much sealing they can do on those lenses.


Good point.
Go to
Oct 17, 2023 15:04:15   #
Series1 wrote:
I own a DMC-FZ300 - the aperture is 2.8 throughout the zoom range. As other posters have stated, it's a small sensor camera - 1/2.3".


Waterproof, too, I believe. How do you like it?
Go to
Oct 17, 2023 09:08:29   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
You might look at what you have and what you want to accomplish. You already have multiple duplicative cropped (DX) Nikon models. Granted, there are performance differences between the D5xxx line and the D7xxx, but they're really much the same camera, one a subset of the other. The windows for dumping the older versions of each camera is probably closed, selling for anything other than a pittance in late 2023. But still, they're just taking up space and thought unnecessarily.

As you consider a smaller walkaround camera, that calls into question three of the bodies, everything but the D7500. The f/2.8 aperture and the 600mm equivalent focal length sounds like even the D7500 is a candidate replacement too. This Lumix body won't be a successful replacement for the DSLR and lenses. But, something for a smaller general purpose digital is an overall good idea.

The small 12MP is the limiting factor in my eyes. If every image was perfect framed and close enough, yes, 12MP is fine. But, there's no reason to limit yourself and your potential cropping. Look instead for something small, possibly smaller to fit in a pants pocket / purse, in the 20MP+ range. The Sony Cybershots and Canon PowerShots are the competitors, ranging from the larger Sony RX10## that maps to the Lumix to the Canon G-series, some that are sized like a deck of cards.
You might look at what you have and what you want ... (show quote)


Good thoughts. I already have a Fuji pocketable camera that I bought for a rafting trip several years ago, but without a evf that served its purpose but is a PIA to use sometimes when it is sunny. I still use my DSLR’s but thought the fz200 would serve for a lightweight camera with a bit more reach. I am looking at it for two reasons as opposed to others; cost and a constant 2.8 throughout the whole range.
Go to
Oct 17, 2023 06:22:12   #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
Once again using “quote reply” will allow us to know who you’re responding to. What User ID was referring to when he said you’re at f/8 at 600mm was the fact that the lens has an actual focal length of 108mm. The small sensor size means that it will give you the same angle of view as a 600mm lens on a full frame camera. They call the difference the “crop factor”. Any sensor smaller than full frame has a crop factor. Your Nikons all have APS-C sensors. They have a crop factor of 1.5. That means the 18-400 lens on the D5500 is equivalent to a 27-600 lens on FF. The FZ200 has a crop factor of 5.6. The thing with the crop factor is it also applies to the aperture, not in the light capturing, but in depth of field. So while that 108mm lens at f/2.8 still works for exposure like an actual 600mm lens, the depth of field will be equivalent to a 600mm lens at over 5 stops higher, closer to f/11.
Once again using “quote reply” will allow us to kn... (show quote)


My reply corrected my typing error concerning the lens on my d5500. It is an 18-140, not 400. That gives me a 35mm equivalent 27-210. The 2.8 I discussed is what the review posted as a constant aperture from 24-600 with the fz200 bridge camera lens.
Go to
Oct 17, 2023 02:19:33   #
Oops. The d5500 wears a 18-140. However,
Bridge camera fz200 reaches to 600 with a constant 2.8.
Go to
Oct 16, 2023 22:49:12   #
Just to clarify in the title to my post I meant to say Lumix dmc fz200, NOT, dx200. My bad. Fat fingers on a small keyboard. Need to put my fingers on a diet. :-)
Go to
Oct 16, 2023 18:37:22   #
Do you mean 600mm in 35mm terms?

Glad to hear you like it. My Nikon d5500 does pretty good with my Nikon 18-400 lens, but thought for the price the fz200 would be a good lightweight addition with the extra reach.
Go to
Oct 16, 2023 17:38:35   #
PHRubin wrote:
Since I can't find any info on a DX200, we need clarification. There was a bridge camera DMC-FZ200, now the DMC-FZ300 and there is the pocketable 1" model the DC-ZS200. There was also a bridge camera the Lumix DC-FZ80 which is still on the Panasonic website but no longer available new at some retailers. There are the 1" bridge cameras the DC-FZ1000 II and the DMC-FZ2500.


I’m looking at the fz200. The fz300 is waterproof but cost considerably more & I don’t believe it has a constant 2.8 aperture throughout the range (28 -600) of the lens. Looking at the fz200, with an evf, forthe size & weight. At the price it’s listed it at it not be a lot to lose if it got damaged. Reviews spoke favorably considering the age.
Go to
Oct 16, 2023 11:48:28   #
Well, trying to make a decision. I have enough Nikon cameras: d5200, d5500, d7000, d7500. I hardly ever use the d5200 anymore, so am thinking about trading it for a LUMIX dmc fz-200 (about $189 exc condition). Used to have a Nikon p520 but it finally quit turning on. So thought the LUMIX bridge would be a lightweight carry around camera with up 600mm range & constant 2.8 aperture when I don’t want to carry my heavier & bulkier cameras. Old tech, but good ratings for a bridge camera. Got good lenses on my DSLR’s(18-300 Nikon & 18-270 Tamron) & can’t afford longer lenses. Thoughts please, including anyone who still uses the LUMIX fz-200. Thanks.
Go to
Oct 14, 2023 11:32:16   #
Beautiful pics! My wife & I have great memories of horse camping in that part of Wyoming.
Go to
Oct 14, 2023 11:29:06   #
Great pics! I miss visiting SW Colorado.
Go to
Oct 14, 2023 11:23:24   #
?????
Go to
Oct 14, 2023 11:21:36   #
Staying busy keeps you thinking young. Will be 80 in December. Walk a mile most mornings, and attend lectures & seminars at University of Texas under the Olli program. Then there’s the yard, other chores, etc. Quit riding horses & motorcycles. Don’t move as fast as I used to, but, still moving. Of course my recliner keeps tempting me so to keep it happy I sometimes oblige it & take a nap. :-)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 156 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.