Mine is whoever said, "A good photograph requires knowing where to stand." I might add that a good photograph also requires knowing when to stand there. Was this Ansel Adams? I couldn't find a web reference for the original comment.
bcheary wrote:
PHOTOS OF WWII
These are great photos and most were attributed to AP. One thing is for sure, the US Marines are really special.
These photographs were classified during WWll.
Many of us have not seen photography like this before. Beautiful, stark black and white pictures, about 110 of
them, of historical significance in this collection. At the end of the pics there are some interesting comments.
For many of us, our fathers and/or grandfathers participated in this action...
World War II: The Pacific and Adjacent Theaters.
http://blogs.denverpost.com/captured/2010/03/18/captured-blog-the-pacific-and-adjacent-theaters/#more-1547
PHOTOS OF WWII br br br br These are great... (
show quote)
The photos of the Japanese sneak attack on Pearl Harbor are priceless.
New technology has to be defined in terms of how it will or will not help you take the type pictures you take. I'm very happy with the 7D although its older type memory disk is an occasional irritation. I also can't transfer images without a cable. That said, I don't really need the "new technology." All my lenses work with the 7D, including the 10-22 mm wide-angle (which won't fit the full-frame cameras).
I find that visiting places I've never been to before helps me see photo opportunities
The problem occurs when you use extension tubes that have no electronics in them.
When looking at the set of "four" there are missing lines on the lower right portions of the middle two bars. I think this creates the visual ambiguity that lets your eyes see the set of three or the set of four.
From what I've read recently the nature of the subject matter's reflected light is important to the effectiveness of a polarizing filter. On some occasions you can turn and turn the filter and nothing seems to happen to dim the unwanted reflections or make the sky bluer. When the polarizing filter is not working effectively from one location on the street, I sometimes try another location to change the angle of the light (usually the existing daylight in my case) reaching the camera. Sometimes this works, sometimes it doesn't, and sometimes it is just not practical to do. And like lots of other photographic equipment, polarizing filters can cost more or cost less depending on their quality and design.
I use a longer lens so I can be further away. I try to fit into the street scene. I don't start taking pictures immediately upon getting to some location. If there is somewhere to sit down I sit down. The best time is when other people are taking pictures. When the pictures are just for my viewing I don't worry. But when they are to be posted for the whole world to see I try not to intrude too much in people's personal lives. I know the law is that when you are in public you are giving people permission to photograph you as long as the picture isn't used to sell products and so on. Then you need a model release. But if the photo shows a person's identity closely I often posterize it with Photoshop or do something else to avoid intruding too much. In the end I don't take very many close pictures of people on the street.
RegisG wrote:
About a year ago I bought a Canon 450D XSi. I've added lenses for macro (excellent Tamron 180mm Macro) and an ok 75-300 Tamron for outdoors.
I've learned my way around the camera and am interested in upgrading, probably a 7D??
Refurbished 7D is in my price range, especially if I get something reasonable for the 450D. My preference is to trade-up rather than outright sell the 450D.
Question:
Is this a reasonable step up from my current camera?
Is trading-up common and do-able for refurbished cameras?
I shoot close-up jewelry and general outdoor scenes.
Appreciate any tips.
RegisG
About a year ago I bought a Canon 450D XSi. I've ... (
show quote)
I have a 7D and like it for both the purposes you mention. The only irritation for me is that is uses the old type memory cards, not the newer, smaller ones you can just slip into a slot on your computer. I connect to my computer using a cable to my camera. I find the card readers are not reliable because the numerous pins get easily bent.
Do you mean February, 2015?
I sometimes use a Canon 100-400mm lens. It is not the perfect walk-around lens because the low end is too large.
No! It's up to interested people to learn. If they don't t that's their choice.
If you like what you do you'll never work a day in your life :)