Posts for: Math78
Jun 26, 2015 11:23:35 #
GrandmaG wrote:
I have the same two cameras as you. I sold the kit 55-200 & gave the D5000 & 18-55 kit lens to my husband. When I got the D7100, I opted for the kit 18-140 lens and I really like it. For portraits, I have an 85/1.8. GREAT lens.
I did the same thing. I bought a factory refurb 18-140 from Adorama. I like it a lot. Sharper than the kit lenses which came with my D7100 and feels like a quality lens.
Jun 26, 2015 11:06:17 #
TommiRulz wrote:
Hey Guys - so I am a totally camera junkie - have been my whole life. I love to get new cameras and just play and learn. I have never had this Sony A6000.... I have heard a lot of hype. Please tell me about it... I am tempted to play with one
I got the A6000 to use with my old Minolta manual lenses from 1972. With a $10 adapter, I now have a "new" collection of sharp, fast prime lenses. I have also bought a couple of old lenses on eBay for less than $20 to play with. You use aperture priority and you can let the camera determine correct ISO and shutter speed. Focus is manual, but A6000 has a "focus peaking" feature which makes focusing fast and accurate.
The Gambel's quail photo was taken with an eBay purchased lens: Soligor 400 mm f/6.3, probably from mid-1970's. No post processing, jpeg is straight from the A6000. Please view download at 100% to see sharpness in the bird's feathers. Sharpness limit is DOF, not the lens or camera in this case. I did use a tripod.
Jun 25, 2015 17:29:07 #
Jackinthebox wrote:
And what is the make model number?
Pixel RW-221 wireless remote. Much more useful than IR remote built into camera.
They make versions for most cameras. The only difference being the cable that connects the receiver to the camera.
Amazon search results for Pixel RW-221:
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?url=search-alias%3Delectronics&field-keywords=Pixel+RW-221
Jun 25, 2015 17:01:28 #
bull drink water wrote:
a pox on camera makers who only put a remote sensor on the front of the camera.
That was my one big gripe with the Sony A6000. If you are only going to have one sensor, at least put it on the back. But I bought an RF remote with 300 foot range for $20 and I was happy again.
Jun 25, 2015 12:03:43 #
I've seen research which claims that professional photos can add $3000 - $5000 to the selling price. I'm not a pro but I'll consider using one when I go to sell my house.
Jun 24, 2015 16:51:18 #
jerryc41 wrote:
I never heard of this technique, although I did he... (show quote)
Here's an example, see tip #5.
http://improvephotography.com/8806/photography-tricks/
(Tip #1 is interesting too.)
Delete Tourists
Jun 23, 2015 22:20:13 #
Glad you were able to fix the focus. The "without" photo is unacceptable for that lens.
Jun 23, 2015 20:27:33 #
jerryc41 wrote:
This article is from six days ago.
http://www.cnet.com/topics/phones/best-phones/camera/
http://www.cnet.com/topics/phones/best-phones/camera/
Digital Photography Review (dpreview.com) also reviews smart phone cameras in their "Connect" section.
http://connect.dpreview.com/
Jun 23, 2015 19:13:19 #
As much as I like my iPhone camera for convenience and availability, I can't see buying a phone just to get a camera. For the same money, you can get a great small camera which will take pictures that are at least as good as the phone camera. Plus you'll have an adjustable f-stop, easy control over iso and shutter speed, etc., if you're concerned about low light capability. You'll also get zoom and image stabilization.
If you do go with a camera phone, make sure it has the capability to use an external SD card to easily remove photos from the phone and increase memory.
If you do go with a camera phone, make sure it has the capability to use an external SD card to easily remove photos from the phone and increase memory.
Jun 23, 2015 18:53:52 #
John_F wrote:
Are there adapters to attach a camera to a telescope? Is it advisable to attach to the eyepiece lens or instead of the eyepiece. My Sony lens takes a 49.5 mm male thread. Or is this a harebrained idea anyway.
You might like to post in the astronomy section.
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/s-109-1.html
Jun 23, 2015 17:10:31 #
Smokey66 wrote:
Matte is flat, and one shouldn't have to clarify that they want 'flat' matte, when they mean the exact same thing. Not having had a look at the ordering site for your photos, I can't say who might be at fault, but as someone who sells paint for a living, I can assure you that there is no wiggle room when it comes to paint. Matte paint is flat.
By the way, I print on Epson Exhibition Matte canvas, and it is flat.
A paper called matte that has a sheen should not be called matte.
By the way, I print on Epson Exhibition Matte canvas, and it is flat.
A paper called matte that has a sheen should not be called matte.
I agree. Dictionary definition should apply:
matte
adjective
1.having a dull or lusterless surface:
matte paint; a matte complexion; a photograph with a matte finish.
noun
2.a dull or dead surface, often slightly roughened, as on metals, paint, paper, or glass.
Jun 23, 2015 15:20:16 #
Davethehiker wrote:
My wife convinced me to buy myself an iPhone6Plus after my old iPhone died. I'm learning how to use it. I'm very impressed by the little built in camera. I have several very good cameras and even more great lenses. Attached is the very first photo I took using the camera. Surprisingly good for such a little camera!
I use an iPhone 5c. A few months ago I got a new macro lens (Tokina 100mm f2.8). For my first test shots, I went around the yard and took close-ups of flowers. I then went back with my iPhone and took similar photos. I posted them all to Facebook. The average person could not tell them apart, the iPhone photos are that good. A "real" photographer would see that the Tokina did a better job blurring the background. That was about the only difference at web resolution. I'm always surprised people still buy cameras which don't make phone calls.
iPhone 5c
D7100 with Tokina 100mm
Jun 19, 2015 22:46:51 #
David Morrison wrote:
Hi Math78,
Thanks for focus peaking tips--I had got that far, but so far haven't seen any sign of it in the view finder --- is it only visible with manual focus, non sony lenses?
Thanks for focus peaking tips--I had got that far, but so far haven't seen any sign of it in the view finder --- is it only visible with manual focus, non sony lenses?
You only see focus peaking when you are in manual focus. Conversely, if you see focus peaking, then you know you are in manual not AF.
Jun 19, 2015 19:29:14 #
David Morrison wrote:
Math 78,
Very nice shots here-- looks like our quail ( New Zealand)- not a native.
By the way, how do I turn on the focus peaking with the a6000?
Cheers,-D.
Very nice shots here-- looks like our quail ( New Zealand)- not a native.
By the way, how do I turn on the focus peaking with the a6000?
Cheers,-D.
Thanks for the compliments. I've decided the A6000 is a much better camera than the lenses that Sony has for it. I liked it a lot more once I got away from the kit lens. It's a great camera for old fashioned manual photography.
Focus peaking is called "Peaking Level" in the menu. You'll also want to customize the C1 button to be Focus Magnifier. That way, you can quickly zoom in and tweak the focus.
Your quail is a California Quail, a close cousin to the Arizona Gambel's Quail.
Cheers!
A6000 Focus Peaking Menu
Jun 18, 2015 18:31:50 #
GoofyNewfie wrote:
Yeah, they lost me at $599.
Me too. I paid less than that for a Sony A6000.