Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Kombiguy
Page: <<prev 1 ... 214 215 216 217
Feb 9, 2013 07:51:47   #
Taken with an Olympus, 1/125, f4.5


Go to
Feb 9, 2013 07:50:28   #
A banded jawfish with eggs in its mouth. Taken with a Nikon D90, 60mm macro, in an Ikelite Housing. 1/200, f22, supplemental flash.


Go to
Jan 30, 2013 17:46:28   #
Festina Lente wrote:
Kombiguy wrote:
Gnslngr wrote:
Kombiguy wrote:
Suppose, just for discussion, that the right to worship, or to free speech, or to peaceably assemble were burdened in the same fashion that the right to bear arms is. Would you oppose or support requiring that anyone wishing to write a letter to the editor be subjected to a background check and be required to obtain a permit from the government?
Suppose, just for discussion, that the second amendment was read in full, with all of it's context actually understood. Wouldn't that be nice? :thumbup:
quote=Kombiguy Suppose, just for discussion, that... (show quote)
Yes. It would support ownership of "assault weapons!"
quote=Gnslngr quote=Kombiguy Suppose, just for d... (show quote)

Application of the term "assault weapon" to civilian semi-automatic rifles has been credited to gun-control activist Josh Sugarmann, author of the 1988 book "Assault Weapons and Accessories in America" who wrote:

"Assault weapons—just like armor-piercing bullets, machine guns, and plastic firearms—are a new topic. The weapons' menacing looks, coupled with the public's confusion over fully automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons—anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine gun—can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons."

This use of the term is highly controversial, especially among gun rights activists, who consider it a misnomer invented specifically to demonize guns that function in no fundamental way differently than many other commonly owned civilian firearms. Often they are distinguished mainly by the presence of black plastic parts in the place of wood for stocks and grips, and the weapons are therefor sometimes called "black guns" or "black rifles".

Robert Crook, executive director of the Coalition of Connecticut Sportsmen, said "the term 'assault weapon,' as used by the media, is a media invention."

Joseph P. Tartaro of the Second Amendment Foundation wrote in 1994 that he believed that the term "assault weapon" was intended by anti-gun strategists to foster confusion with the public, which he felt "does not know the difference between a fully automatic and a semi-automatic firearm."

Tartaro's premise has been supported hundreds of times since 1994 by folks deeply involved with preservation of our second amendment.
quote=Kombiguy quote=Gnslngr quote=Kombiguy Sup... (show quote)


Hence my use of quotes.
Go to
Jan 30, 2013 15:26:05   #
Gnslngr wrote:
Kombiguy wrote:
Suppose, just for discussion, that the right to worship, or to free speech, or to peaceably assemble were burdened in the same fashion that the right to bear arms is. Would you oppose or support requiring that anyone wishing to write a letter to the editor be subjected to a background check and be required to obtain a permit from the government?


Suppose, just for discussion, that the second amendment was read in full, with all of it's context actually understood. Wouldn't that be nice? :thumbup:
quote=Kombiguy Suppose, just for discussion, that... (show quote)


Yes. It would support ownership of "assault weapons!"
Go to
Jan 29, 2013 21:32:02   #
Eugene wrote:
Hey Kombiguy..Welcome to the forum.
If you are addressing a certain individual please click on quote reply under their statement. This will let us know who you're speaking to.
However, if you're just throwing that question out for anybody (which is good in an open forum), I will be the first to say that I would strongly oppose it.
Kombiguy wrote:
Suppose, just for discussion, that the right to worship, or to free speech, or to peaceably assemble were burdened in the same fashion that the right to bear arms is. Would you oppose or support requiring that anyone wishing to write a letter to the editor be subjected to a background check and be required to obtain a permit from the government?
Hey Kombiguy..Welcome to the forum. br If you are ... (show quote)


Just tossing it out as a way to think about the issue. And thanks for the welcome!
Go to
Jan 29, 2013 21:17:17   #
Suppose, just for discussion, that the right to worship, or to free speech, or to peaceably assemble were burdened in the same fashion that the right to bear arms is. Would you oppose or support requiring that anyone wishing to write a letter to the editor be subjected to a background check and be required to obtain a permit from the government?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 214 215 216 217
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.