Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: chasgroh
Page: <<prev 1 ... 210 211 212 213 214 215 next>>
Sep 16, 2015 13:21:36   #
...latest group in process...will eventually be 20+ groups, show in Rochester NY over Labor Day weekend:
http://photos.drumcorpsplanet.com/Drum-Corps-DCA/2015-DCA-Prelims
Go to
Sep 16, 2015 13:13:49   #
Kuzano wrote:
WOW!!!!!!!!!!

THERE ARE ONLY 1440 MINUTES IN A DAY.???????????? 24 HOURS.

HOW ARE YOU FOLKS DOING IT....?

OH YEAH, IT'S CALLED SPRAY AND PRAY!!!


Now.... be honest and tell us your number of keepers out of each 100?


The way I shoot pageantry nowadays is *not* "spray and pray," although I do have my D4 set on slow burst and do shoot quite a few doubles/triples so as to get a tossed implement (flag, baton, rifle) both in the air and the catch...my finger is pretty educated to get one shot at a time for the remainder. Of course there are exceptions where I just may burst more than two or three. Overall, I reject maybe 25%, most of them being duplicates but certainly focus issues too...keepers are plentiful and the moms and dads are generally pleased with the results. It surely isn't anything other than a variant on sports photography...
Go to
Sep 16, 2015 12:21:50   #
johnhaker wrote:
Is "Flamboyant" and " Excessive" the same thing?


No. But, then, I'm a journalism major... ;0)
Go to
Sep 16, 2015 11:36:37   #
Well, I dunno if it'll set any records, but my personal "best" is 8600, but commonly I'll get 6,000 plus. I shoot pageantry and the days get pretty long sometimes, depending on the number of groups. Indoor color guards account for the greatest amounts, there may be 60+ groups at 7 minutes of action a pop!

Blue Devils Drum and Bugle Corps

Go to
Jul 19, 2015 15:44:18   #
Dbrogers wrote:
Well I took my Sigma 150-600 lens back to dealer were I bought it yesterday. The dealership was having a tent sale so there was a Rep. From Sigma which was nice. The gentleman from Sigma looked at it and said that it was working.
I had traded in my Tamron 150-600 lens to get the Sigma 150-600. On the Tamron when (VC) is on you could tell in the viewfinder, the image would like lock down like it was on a tripod. I don't know how else to describe it. Tamron users should know what I mean. With the Sigma I was told that they have different technology similar to Nikon and it does not do that but it is working.
I took it out and used it yesterday with it on an off OS and you can see the difference. I was very impressed with the quality of the images.
The Rep. From Sigma was from out of town but he did give me his email address and phone number in case I have anymore questions.
While I'm on the subject does anyone have the USB dock, if so how do you like it?
I think it's just a learning curve getting used to a different lens.
Well I took my Sigma 150-600 lens back to dealer w... (show quote)


I have two Sigmas: the 15mm f2.8 Fisheye and the workhorse 24-70 f2,8...both are fine lenses. A friend got the 150-600 and his stuff is *really* good...all my other lenses are Nikkor (16-28 f4, 70-200 f2.8 vII, and my 200-400 f4) but I see no need to fill the gaps with Nikon...Sigma is great!
Go to
Jul 16, 2015 04:12:45   #
...I don't *think* it makes a difference, other than reformatting in-camera is very fast and the other way would be...uh...very slow? I'm in the habit (verified Nikon "good" habit) of formatting in-camera...you know that even though you've "formatted" the shots you've just made go away are still there, right? Most of the good card manufacturers have data recovery software available...for those times when you get in an "...OH NO!" situation and need to get those formatted images back...I've had to do it and, whew, what a relief. But if you *start* shooting on the card data will be lost, covered by the new...sorry to go off topic, but it seemed appropriate...
Go to
Jul 15, 2015 17:22:51   #
eviemyoung wrote:
I agree. I just upgraded to the latest cc and now I can't find my perfect suites, nik software, topaz filters etc. This is a pain in the neck and I am reluctant to upgrade again the next time it is offered. I am spending too much time adding my plug ins again. I wish Adobe would get with the program.


...all major updates (not the incremental kind like, 6.1 to 6.2) require that you reinstall your plugins and added software. I just had to do the same thing...yes, pain, but the more you do it, less trouble it becomes as time marches on...
Go to
Jul 5, 2015 14:00:04   #
Dngallagher wrote:
For your workflow it sounds like it is great, I have thought about eye-fi, but shooting 100 raw shots in the field then downloading those large files via wifi when I get home is a killer, unless speed has increased drastically.

Do you shoot raw or JPG?


Eye-Fi is out for me...I shoot thousands of pix in a shoot (pageantry groups...I've shot 8500 shots in a day, whew) so I'm just in that workflow. Long ago I was tethering the camera body to my 'puter and mentioned that to a tech at a good camera shop hereabouts...he yakked up a furrball. What you are doing (according to this tech) is putting the internals of the camera body at risk. So, that made alot of sense to me and I've done the card-in-out thing ever since. 10 years, *never* a problem with my CF, SD, or XQD cards not meshing or whatever. Speed for me is paramount, I use 64 gig cards (both of my bodies have dual slots...D4 and D800) and sometimes pack 'em pretty good, so downloading into my 'puters, even with the speediest cards, takes awhile!
Go to
Jun 16, 2015 13:30:06   #
rpavich wrote:
By the way, I'd choose all shade anytime over sun or mixed.

I'd move around until I got a background that was far away enough so that it blurred.

You can make a garbage dump look like paradise with some out of focus blur.


There is a webcast by Roberto Valenzuela where he shows how to solve all these problems; and it's free. I'll post the link when I can find it.

He took a dirty, garbage, dirt filled L.A. backyard and got a great portrait out of it and he goes through his thought process of how he got there.
By the way, I'd choose all shade anytime over sun ... (show quote)


I'm with you, mostly...I think *experience* is the ultimate trump card. As an adjunct of time-in-trade is the ability to work *quickly* and efficiently. I was just at a theater performance with a bunch of graduating seniors...at the end of the show we herded (you gotta know how *that* goes with teens lol) them into a spot picked beforehand...I had 30 seconds, max. Came out of there thinking "...maybe I'm starting to get this!" Until, of course, the next situation where my experience doesn't quite match up to the circumstances!


Go to
Jun 7, 2015 05:20:48   #
...use the time you gain from *not* trying to fix it (only to break again) to go out shooting...or gaining insight into some software...or lights...or...or... ;0)
Go to
May 28, 2015 18:23:56   #
Boone wrote:
We both used shutter release, not BBF. Camera autofocus. Thanks, Boone.


...hey Boone, as an aside, nice lighting on your profile portrait!
Go to
May 27, 2015 12:36:53   #
I shoot alot of moving, sports-type events, and have experimented with VR turned on or off several times. My year old 70-200 f2.8 VII started making a weird vibration during one of these shoots, a little groan accompanied the condition. Well, I needed to have my D4 cleaned so took both items to Nikon here in LA to have the work done. (If you live in the LA area this shop is user friendly and, of course, expert in their service). Upon pick-up I was informed that they'd replaced the VR motor in the lens! Simply, I was informed that the VR function is designed for when the camera is pretty much stable, whether hand-held or on a 'pod, to lessen camera shake (I coulda sworn the tech wanted to shake his finger at me!)...*not* intended for use in, for want of a better term, sportish photography. Pros I know had always advised "turn it off" when discussing VR and now I know why...of course they knew what kind of shooting I do, too. Heh, I've learned that VR is, indeed, a tool and has its place in my kit and I won't be burning out any more VR motors anytime soon!
Go to
May 27, 2015 12:13:31   #
burkphoto wrote:
Whether it's SHOUTING, bad grammar, bad spelling, improper word usage or choice, no capitalization, or improper punctuation, when your medium gets in the way of understanding your message, you might as well have quit before you started.

Good grammar and form are like good grooming... signs of cultural maturity, good taste, and great care. Most folks don't expect perfection, just reasonable care. That's why there are Preview and Edit buttons on the site.


This! (...and Marshal McLuhan: "The Medium is the Message"...)
Go to
Jan 9, 2015 15:12:46   #
..take some of these suggestions and rent! I know *I* wouldn't blindly take advice without trying the equipment...that said, I use a D800 and 16-35 f4 and love 'em...but *you* are the end-user.
Go to
Dec 18, 2014 12:09:03   #
DaveHam wrote:
I use the Nikon tc 2.0 111 with the 70-200 frequently on both a D800 and a D4.

It gives you a 400mm F5.6 which is useful. AF on the D800 is slower than the D4, and also wanders a bit in low light, but the combination works as well as any teleconverter on a telephoto and adds a lot of flexibility when travelling light.

Image quality with the 'mark 3' generation of Nikon teleconverters is good, sharpness is close to that of the native lens.

You should not be disappointed.


Agree. I have the same bodies, lens, and 2.0 TC..also have used the 1.4 quite a bit and *it* is as good as it gets. It doesn't make sense to not use Nikon/Nikon gear, IMO...
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 210 211 212 213 214 215 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.