Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Posts for: Thurber Mingus
Jan 23, 2022 22:54:58 #
JohnFrim wrote:
Nice image. I assume she knows you took the photo (despite the blindfold 
).
).Yes she does :)
Jan 23, 2022 21:52:00 #
Jim Tonne wrote:
Are you asking a question ? - JimT
No, just posted a pic. Why would you think I was asking a question?
Jan 23, 2022 17:48:47 #
JeffDavidson wrote:
Looks like color splotches on her right rib cage and elsewhere.
Hmmm, I’m not seeing that.
Check out AI Artistry and Creation section of our forum.
Jan 23, 2022 17:25:18 #
Hi all! I recently got a new camera (Canon R3) and lens (Canon RF 50mm f/1.2). I've had it a few weeks but haven't had many opportunities to try them out together, so this morning I finally did. Unfortunately since I shoot some indoor sports I mistakenly left it set to record only JPG, no RAW files, but the color and "feel" of this camera is head and shoulders above the R6 in my opinion. Anyway, I thought I should post something here for you to check out, it's very nearly straight out of camera.
By the way, I highly recommend viewing the download. People have complained because this camera is "only" 24.1 megapixels, but I'm not anticipating printing at billboard sizes (and viewing from a few feet), and as you can see it's plenty of resolution for viewing on a computer screen!
By the way, I highly recommend viewing the download. People have complained because this camera is "only" 24.1 megapixels, but I'm not anticipating printing at billboard sizes (and viewing from a few feet), and as you can see it's plenty of resolution for viewing on a computer screen!
Jan 21, 2022 17:30:09 #
I'm just waiting for the carrot to make another appearance :)
Jan 18, 2022 17:44:17 #
Jan 17, 2022 23:40:58 #
While it's true that not providing images with EXIF data can be explained, if you CAN provide original images and the associated EXIF data it (almost) settles the debate. If you have the images/data and you are challenged, why not provide them? I would be happy to provide any of mine if asked.
The photo of Gemma and friend definitely has an odd look to it, as if it's a composite.
The photo of Gemma and friend definitely has an odd look to it, as if it's a composite.
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Jan 15, 2022 15:31:43 #
InfiniteISO wrote:
My wife is doing much better, so there may be more... (show quote)
Glad to hear she's doing better! Tell her she has many fans here.
Jan 14, 2022 17:29:36 #
uscfd wrote:
I haven't been looking here much lately, but when I do, I look at who made the post, not the replies.
Glad you're still here. You need to post your own work again. We would all appreciate it.
Glad you're still here. You need to post your own work again. We would all appreciate it.
Thanks, I posted something in November, but I'll try to get something else up soon :)
Jan 14, 2022 16:52:14 #
I've posted several times on LaylaFan's topics lately...still around :)
Jan 8, 2022 23:36:59 #
Love that shot, thanks for posting!
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Jan 6, 2022 16:43:30 #
InfiniteISO wrote:
Fun and creative image. I've always wanted to do this. Maybe we'll try this soon. Of course, I will be the one tasked to clean the windows.
Nah, it's better if the windows are a little dirty :)
Jan 5, 2022 22:39:59 #
rmalarz wrote:
Here's a recent one of Layla looking at a photo that was made of her sitting on a bed. Doesn't she look ravishing? She was a lot of fun to photograph as she kept coming up with creative ideas throughout our many sessions. She was quite proud of her assets, and who could blame her.
If you folks like her, I'll post more.
--Bob
If you folks like her, I'll post more.
--Bob
Ah yes, that's the photo he had to blur out the flat screen TV to make it look like it was from the 70s!
Jan 5, 2022 20:37:07 #
Laylafan69 wrote:
they would have to be 50+- years old...they are immaculate...the picture is crappy as was common for that 1981 model...My Dad helped me stage these
Thanks, glad we cleared that up!
Jan 5, 2022 20:22:37 #
Laylafan69 wrote:
the polaroids are real from 2015-2016 there is absolutely no trace of them anywhere before then...they were painstakingly staged...not expensive to do at all.
Right...thanks for clarifying that.
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.