Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Just Trying To Focus
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
Mar 22, 2017 11:12:39   #
oneillj wrote:
I'm taking a course on Photigy. Alex Koloskov has a white wall in his studio. I have a white cloth background (some kind of muslin) that's supposedly wrinkly free. It's OK for high key because I can blow out the background but for a gray or gradient, you can still see the wrinkles. I can't use seamless paper because I'm in my house and need something I can pack up and store easily. It also needs to be fairly big because some of shots require bouncing light. So, I'm trying to find a background that will work. Any ideas? I've included an attachment so you can see the issue.
I'm taking a course on Photigy. Alex Koloskov has ... (show quote)


Have you looked at the white tents that are often used for product photography?


https://www.amazon.com/Perfect-2090-30-Inch-Backgrounds-Photography/dp/B000UCEUQI/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1490195534&sr=8-4&keywords=product+photography+tent
Go to
Mar 21, 2017 16:28:18   #
Shel wrote:
Thanks for the website address. Your photos are great. I am amazed at the quality of the photos at such high zoom setting and with a small sensor camera. Of course, your ability with a camera far overshadows any loss in image quality of a larger sensor slr.


When viewing the EXIF on my P900 photos, you have to kind of decipher the focal length. If the EXIF says 357mm, then that would be their equivalent of 2000mm...in other words, if the EXIF says 357mm, then I have used the zoom to its full extent, without going into digital zoom mode.

Sandy
Go to
Mar 21, 2017 14:53:48   #
Shel wrote:
My hands are not steady and I would like a camera with an in body stabilization, like the Sony A6500 or the A7II. My hesitation in regard to Sony is the dearth of lenses. My primary interest is photographing birds and my problem is at its worst when shooting with a 300mm lens. Guidance would be appreciated.


I have a Sony A6000 and I personally wouldn't consider it a good "birding" camera, because there aren't many long zoom lenses available, unless you get an adapter and use A mount lenses.

I have a Canon 80D and Tamron 150-600 lens that I can use for birding (stabilization is in the lens, not the camera, though.) That said, I find myself reaching for my Nikon P900 FAR more than the Canon 80D with the big Tamron lens when it comes to birding. The P900 is a small sensor camera, so the image quality is not that of an slr, but with its great image stabilization and 83x zoom it is just plain FUN.

Here is a link to some of my photo samples with the Nikon P900.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/sandyhowell/albums/72157669935023610
Go to
Mar 15, 2017 11:20:26   #
Carolina Wings wrote:
Since we are so close to Spring but many of us can't see the spring for all the snow...I thought I would send you the Bluebird of Happiness your way...to brighten your day


I love the "in flight" shot! Just beautiful, all of them.

Sandy
Go to
Mar 15, 2017 11:02:22   #
RLSeipleSr wrote:
I am not a bird photography but I made a grab shot of this guy somewhere in the Caribbean ... can anyone tell me what it is ... ? And, is there anything I could quickly do to make it a better wall hanger ... (I do have LR and PS but very little experience in either) ...

Bob S


Perhaps it's this one. It does look like an oriole to me.

http://www.birdscaribbean.org/2016/12/opportunity-to-study-one-of-the-rarest-birds-in-the-caribbean-the-bahama-oriole-project/
Go to
Mar 15, 2017 11:00:05   #
RLSeipleSr wrote:
I am not a bird photography but I made a grab shot of this guy somewhere in the Caribbean ... can anyone tell me what it is ... ? And, is there anything I could quickly do to make it a better wall hanger ... (I do have LR and PS but very little experience in either) ...

Bob S


I did a google search and came up with this. It might be the same bird, but I really don't know.


http://www.stmartinisland.org/even-more-st-martin-island/st-martin-focus-of-the-month/93-specials/328-sucrier.html

Sandy
Go to
Mar 15, 2017 10:50:13   #
CORNSMOKE wrote:
.... before the snow flies



This is a great photo. Love the composition. I'd not have thought to place the cabin so far to the lower right, but it is perfect there. Very refreshing, and I like it much better than a straight on view.
Sandy
Go to
Mar 15, 2017 10:44:14   #
Greenbean wrote:
Well, I put my toes in the water and didn't drown so here are a couple more.......

Love the second one! It really shows just how huge that tree and those roots are!!
Go to
Mar 12, 2017 12:09:06   #
papakatz45 wrote:
The issue with using Carbonite or any other cloud based system for backup purposes is not the slowness of the program, it is the slowness of your internet connection. The initial backup may take a long time due to the size of your files being uploaded. After the initial backup everything is done in the background and is speedy. Using the cloud for storage is much faster since you are only accessing one file at a time. Carbonite can be set where they will overnight a portable hard drive to you with everything you had backed up if you need that. It must be remembered programs such as Carbonite and similar ones are designed for cloud backup not everyday cloud storage.
The issue with using Carbonite or any other cloud ... (show quote)


I had the misfortune of having to use Carbonite's "courier" service, and was very happy to have that hard drive arrive by FED EX, with all my files on it. I was surprised they let me keep the hard drive, too. It's a bit pricey for the home premium program I'm on ($150 a year) but to me it's been worth it. I have paid about $80 for an identical hard drive to the one they sent me to keep. I have a very slow internet service, so re-uploading everything to the cloud was a pain (I had to re upload because I changed operating systems). But at least I only had to re upload, not re download AND re upload.
Go to
Mar 12, 2017 12:02:24   #
brucewells wrote:
Cloud backup should be employed to provide an off-site copy of all data. Prudence dictates you have a couple drives to backup to at home. But, if the house burns, or gets blown away, that cloud backup is gonna come in handy.


I agree completely! I back up to two externals, and keep one at my place of work, away from my home. Carbonite is my extra measure of protection, but not my first line source. It takes a while for files to upload to carbonite, so when I come home from shooting something I don't want to lose, I immediately back it up to the external, and let Carbonite back it up at its own speed.
Go to
Mar 12, 2017 11:57:03   #
yotshot wrote:
I had carbonite for several years until I had a hard drive crash. The I found out all of the things that it did not backup like emails, videos and programs. Fortunately, I had many of my photos backed up to external drives. Unfortunately, the most recent shoot of around 1000 photos was not backed up. It represented a weekend professional shoot which could not be recovered. I had assumed that it had been backed up in the week since I uploaded it, but no. Trying to restore from carbonate was painfully slow, so, it ended up being of no use at all. Then came the task of stopping the carbonate payments. They would not cancel my service until I finally had to cancel my credit card. Not nice people to deal with. Funny that the positive reviews are all from people who have never had to use them.
I had carbonite for several years until I had a ha... (show quote)


I've had to use them, twice. And you are right, downloading those photos to get them back was PAINFULLY slow. So then I upgraded to the more expensive plan, and when my computer crashed, they sent me a Western Digital USB hard drive with all my files on them. They fed-exed it right away and I was very happy with the service. With this more expensive plan, I also have mirror image back up to my own external hard drive, so my programs and documents are all there on the external.

I don't like automatic renewal so once my yearly renewal goes through, I go on their system and remove my credit card information so they can't renew it automatically. Then it's up to me to remember to get back on line and renew it when the year is up.

I have friends who have had bad experiences with Carbonite, but thus far, I've been very lucky. I hope my luck continues!
Go to
Mar 11, 2017 10:56:27   #
Longshadow wrote:
Carbonite does not upload 24/7, especially after the initial upload. It only transfers what has changed. It is not constantly uploading. It's no different that copying everything to an external drive.


Well, in my case it kinda does, because I have 827 GB of files on there, and every time I edit a photo on my hard drive, it uploads the changed file. It seems like it's never all up to date.
Go to
Mar 10, 2017 21:51:14   #
Longshadow wrote:
I've used Carbonite for a few years, very pleased so far. No apparent restrictions on file size as my RAWs are there (as well as JPEGs, DOCs, PDFs, etc.) no limit for storage. The files are encrypted when stored. I like that it keeps track of what is/isn't backed up and has little dots on the file names to indicate the backup status. They backup "standard" directories, and I can add directories to the list. The initial backup took about a week because of the number of files, subsequent additions are automatic and rather quick. It costs about $60 a year for my one PC. (This is in addition to my external drive backup and a copy on my laptop.) The primary reason for me using the cloud is it is off-site without having to take a drive someplace periodically.
I've used Carbonite for a few years, very pleased ... (show quote)


I also use Carbonite because it automatically backs up, so the files I've not yet taken time to back up on external hard drives are "in the cloud". The first time I had a computer crash, I was glad to have Carbonite, because I could get my files back, but I had to re-download every file, and it took LITERALLY weeks....and THEN, since I went from one version of windows to another, I had to re-upload them all back to Carbonite again. After that, I switched to their more expensive plan, which includes "courier service". When the computer crashes, they send you an external hard drive, (which is yours to keep) that has all your files on it. I actually had the misfortune of having to utilize this courier service, and I was rather impressed. They Fed Ex'd a Western Digital hard drive to me very quickly, and I had all my files right there, without having to redownload them all from Carbonite. Carbonite is not the perfect solution, though. I have been told by a computer tech that its hard on a computer's drive to constantly be uploading files 24/7, and that using Carbonite may be killing my computers. That may or may not be true. I don't know much about hard drives or how they work. And as another poster mentioned, it is rather slow to find a file you want if you don't have a fast internet connection. I do now back up everything to two external USB hard drives and keep one copy off site.

Sandy
Go to
Mar 6, 2017 15:25:20   #
lwerthe1mer wrote:
This is a confessional comment of a shoot from last weekend that I awkwardly stumbled through.

I really blew my first experience as a group, probably 35 years ago. I was shooting with a Canon fTb. To shoot flash, the shutter speed had to be set on 1/60. Somehow I inadvertently moved the shutter speed to 1/70. Each picture was 1/2 what I wanted to shoot and the other 1/2 was black. My photos were unusable, and I was embarrassed.

35 years later, I guess memories of my photographic blunder had faded. I was asked to be the group photographer at a friend's birthday party. The experience was quite an adventure.

The party was in a long and narrow room, at night, with large picture windows facing a street, with views of a "lit up" shopping center with lot of car headlights and taillights. To make matters more challenging, the room was decorated in part with mylar balloons floating at the ceiling. The balloons had long, colorful ribbons hanging to perhaps 5 feet over the floor (about shoulder or face level on most people).

In a relatively small room containing 60 or 70 people, I assumed my mission was to simply photograph the faces of everyone in attendance, typically in groups, and to photograph the birthday cake.

I brought both of my cameras to the party, a Sony a7ii with a 35mm f2.8 Zeiss lens, and a Sony RX10ii with its built-in Zeiss zoom lens. My flash, a Youngnuo 560 III, which I used in the shoe on top of the cameras. The flash did not communicate well or consistently with either camera (my fault, I feel certain), and sometimes the flash didn't fire at all. I quickly found that the flash communicated better with my RX10ii, and I used that camera most of the time. I would appreciate any advice you might give me on how to set up the "on camera" flash.

I shot in RAW, using shutter priority mode, and set the shutter speed at 1/60, bouncing the flash off of the ceiling and walls. I started with a low ISO of 200 but moved ISO to 800 by the end of the night. I thought that my flash and fast lenses made the use of higher ISOs unnecessary.

I intentionally did not use "AF Assist", which would have shined a light immediately before shutter release and made focusing much faster. I felt the light beam would be a distraction. This was probably a mistake.

After a night of playing with my cameras and being frustrated with the flash, I collected my compensation, a piece of birthday cake (which I believe everyone else got as well), and I went home with low expectations.

When I first glanced at the photos the following morning, immediately after import to my computer, panic struck. Almost all of my photos were too dark, and a large number were totally black.

I rarely use the exposure slider in post-processing, but I found in some instances that increasing exposure was a life-saver. Noise was very manageable. I had to remove a lot of small lights and other distractions from all shots with the window in the background, and I tried to remove as many ribbons as possible. I cropped many of the shots to eliminate people in the background and the drinks most people were holding when I photographed them.

To my surprise and in spite of my fumbling around, the photos were very good. They aren't works of art, but they are fairly complementary portraits documenting attendees of the event. Here are a few samples.
This is a confessional comment of a shoot from las... (show quote)


I can imagine your sigh of relief!! These are great shots. And "they" will never know the difference!
Go to
Mar 5, 2017 09:11:41   #
Nicky wrote:
Iphone picture of my Ace wearing his new collar. I am only an amateur photographer but love taking pictures. I always have my iPhone with me, and rarely have my DSLRs with me, so most of my recent photos are iPhones. The inconvenience and bulk of carrying the DSLR gear was a game-changer for me. I have sent emails to local professional photographers to ask if I can be a second shooter, for free, so I can use my DSLR gear, but have never received a reply. I also have been asked by neighbors not to take pictures while walking in the street with my DSLR around my neck taking pictures of holiday lawn decorations. So lately my DSLR gear has stayed at home. Such a shame, I much prefer the DSLR photo over the iPhone photo, but it is better to take an iPhone photo than no photo at all.
Iphone picture of my Ace wearing his new collar. I... (show quote)


Awe! Love the pup with his new bling!

It's sad that this world has come to a place in time where neighbors don't want photos taken of their holiday decorations. There was a time when they'd be proud that you thought their creative efforts worthy of a photo. Now it's a world of suspicion at every turn.

Sandy
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.