Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: BrettProbert
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 next>>
Feb 14, 2017 15:16:28   #
D500 or D7200 with a 200-500 f/5.6 and a mild wide angle to mild telephoto zoom.
Go to
Feb 13, 2017 18:39:23   #
$249
Go to
Feb 13, 2017 05:49:42   #
Gene51 wrote:
This is an idea that if certain planets are aligned, the moon is full, and the stars are smiling, could turn out ok. However, my experience is that when an inexperienced photographer does something like this it often does not end well.

Things that can go wrong on this most important of days for a couple:

1. Gear failure. It happens. It sounds like he/she does not have backup gear, just in case.
2. Not having a contract - even if he is doing it for free, there needs to be a contract that describes a scope of work - what shots he/she is expected to get, and when the shooter is expected to deliver the proofs
3. Inexperience with gear - nothing worse than waiting for a photographer to stop fumbling around with the camera.
4. Dropped lens, left the battery in the charger, left the memory card in the card reader - it happens.
5. On the day of the wedding, the Bridezilla emerges - it happens, and unless he is a super-dooper people person, she (or her mother) will be completely unmanageable.
6. Not having a Plan B, Plan C etc - wedding party is late, it starts to rain, the wind kicks up - things you have no control over but happen nonetheless - contingency plans need to be in place "just in case" and need to be discussed beforehand.
7. A single flash and a work light will not do. Points to lack of experience. Shooter needs to be fully familiar and comfortable with low ambient light and bounce flash. Fast lenses are not the answer. You can't shoot a wedding at F1.8 - shallow depth of field will spoil a lot of the shots. Good shooting technique, even better post processing skills so that high ISO shots are not too noisy. I doubt the minister will allow you to set up a work light in the church. Many won't even let you use flash - too distracting.
8. MWACs and GWACs - moms with cameras and guys with cameras - nothing worse than having a great shot spoiled by someone's cellphone and hand right in the middle of the scene. This needs to be discussed and if the bride and groom do not agree to an "unplugged" wedding, where there will be a designated time and place to take shots of and with the wedding party and the couple, they will need to understand that your friend is not responsible for the results.
9. Not having enough batteries, memory cards.
10. Not having an assistant - I would never personally take on an assignment like this without an extra hand. Just having an extra hand to hold a pole mounted flash held by an assistant will greatly improve the results.
11. Permits - if some of the shooting will be done outside, at a park or somewhere else, a photographer will need to secure a permit.
12. Insurance - what happens if something goes wrong - you are on someone else's property - you are liable if someone is injured as a result of your negligence. Insurance is a must.
13. What happens if your friend goes out to dinner the night before the wedding, eats something that causes them to get sick and wakes up the next morning with the sluices open at each end? This speaks to contingency plans in #6.

These are some of the gotchas - all of which I have either seen happen or have happened to me.

I suggest your friend not take this on. This is too important a day. Right now, they are thinking of the money they'll save. After the wedding they may end up being really disgusted at the results, and there goes another personal relationship down the tubes. A wedding shooter has to be confident, experienced, and extremely well-organized to pull it off. And he/she doesn't get a do-over if things don't work out.

One last thing - has the couple contacted the caterer, the florist, the tailor, the reception hall, DJ/Musicians, etc to see if they will get a discount? Probably not. The couple is not placing a proper value on photographic services, and this is a red flag. They are expecting great results for free.

I cannot say it enough - your friend should not accept this. Too big a responsibility. I there is time, your friend should at the very least find a wedding photographer that is willing to take him/her on as an unpaid assistant, just so he/she can get a better sense of what is involved.
This is an idea that if certain planets are aligne... (show quote)


Other than that though, he should be good to go!
Go to
Feb 3, 2017 13:03:31   #
Ditto.
PixelStan77 wrote:
i sold my sigma 150-600 Sport and bought a Nikon 200-500 and never looked back. The Nikon 200-500 is an amazing lens. That would be my suggestion.
Go to
Jan 28, 2017 10:00:22   #
leftj wrote:
Just a dumb response that's does nothing more than reflect a baseless personal bias. We're all guilty of having them but best not to air them.


You're right and I'm sorry!
Go to
Jan 27, 2017 14:45:22   #
MiroFoto wrote:
You sounded like my mother :" See, I told you so." But I need somebody who had/has the same problem and resolved it.
Sorry , I know you tried.
Miro



You're right. Sorry!
Go to
Jan 27, 2017 09:41:03   #
That's why I never, ever buy third party lenses. In the end you always get what you pay for. Yes, Nikon lenses do have issues, but far fewer and with far better long term coverage and reliability.
Go to
Jan 23, 2017 18:17:56   #
Also sent PM.
Go to
Jan 17, 2017 18:34:42   #
It's not that bad. It's f/1.4 throughout the entire focal length and it only weighs 1179 ounces!
Go to
Jan 17, 2017 18:27:56   #
Well, I hate to brag but I don't ever have change lenses. Truly an all-in-one zoom!!!!
Go to
Jan 17, 2017 17:48:40   #
I have the Nikon 10-2485mm and I love it!
Go to
Jan 14, 2017 14:39:50   #
Craters of the Moon National Monument and the Sawtooth Mountains in Idaho are some personal favs, but there's lots of pretty country there. Very diverse!
Go to
Jan 13, 2017 06:39:45   #
You can fine tune that feature in the menu.
Go to
Jan 10, 2017 06:25:59   #
OhWowMan...PM sent.
Go to
Jan 10, 2017 05:52:53   #
Let me look into that and get back to you. Thanks!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.