Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: delkeener
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 29 next>>
Jan 8, 2019 03:20:05   #
I have a neat little WHITE Lumix LX7 that really screams *amateur* *tourist* and shoot through a fast Leica zoom lens that slips past most of those screeners in a coat pocket easily..
Go to
Jan 8, 2019 02:57:37   #
You are still in the camera system trap and that's something that grows and grows as if it has a life of it's own. Why not ditch the system idea and think about really lightening the load with the recent Panasonic Lumix LX 100 II. It's Micro Four Thirds sensor with 17 MP (crop factor 2) and has a fixed Leica Summilux 24-75mm (35mm equivalent) f1.7-2.8 Zoom Lens. Weight 392 grams (just less than a pound) all up. Add a couple of the Godox radio sync TTL speed lights a decent tripod or monopod and you're good to go.
Go to
Jan 8, 2019 01:30:56   #
I'm going with the other two responders who suggest going to the advanced search of eBay and entering each individual item in the description box then check the box for sold items and click the "search" button. The results are actual sales which are the best indication of real values.
Go to
Jan 5, 2019 00:43:34   #
If you are thinking about what kind of camera to buy I suggest you stop and think carefully about making a business of portrait photography. The first thing you need before buying an expensive set of tools is experience in a customer oriented business and a business plan.
Go to
Jan 4, 2019 16:39:19   #
If you use a crop sensor Nikon DSLR your best bet for a portrait lens is 50mm Nikkor lens which acts as the equivalent of a 75mm and saves you a bundle of lens money.

I once operated a portrait studio for Expressly Portraits. an upscale chain that used Mamiya RB67s (60mm x 70 mm negatives) and 90mm lens. We delivered the finished portraits up to 11x14 in one hour after the sitting was completed. Few customers wanted more than one or two 11x14s and most preferred more 8x10s and 5x7s plus a handful of wallet sized prints. Very, very few wanted 16x20 or 20x24 which were also sold, just took a week more or less because those were all printed in a central lab which put express mail time into the delivery equation.

Today's crop sensors Nikon digital cameras make perfectly acceptable 11x14s which I'm fairly sure would please a customer assuming your work as a photographer met there expectations.
Bokehen wrote:
No matter what camera you decide on getting (assuming it's a Nikon) resort to also purchasing a Nikon 85mm f/1.8G strictly use for portraits.
Go to
Jan 4, 2019 16:10:35   #
When I was a kid in the 1930's I spent many hours looking at a huge stereo photo collection in the Baldwin Public Library which had at least a dozen of those viewers in a special alcove devoted entirely to viewing the collection, a small addition to the building to house it, and comfortable furnishings all left to our city in a wealthy resident's last will and testament.
newtoyou wrote:
I found this at a yard sale, cleaned it and made the stand. The forrunner of the Viewmaster? Much nicer looking, I think.
A Steriopticon. Even sounds better that 'Viewmaster'.
Bill
The last shot puts me in mind of the alien In a Buggs Bunny cartoon.
Go to
Jan 3, 2019 17:03:31   #
Remember how to get a very large umbrella effect for the shadow fill light by using the corner of two white walls and a white ceiling and aim a wide flash at the point formed by the three surfaces.
Go to
Jan 3, 2019 16:56:14   #
Suggest you check out Strobist.com
Go to
Jan 2, 2019 11:02:52   #
Have a strange impression of artificiality on the upside down Scooby Do photo. Almost as if it's put together with library paste. Does anyone else think it strange?
Fotomacher wrote:
I have 3 camera bodies and a good arsenal of prime lenses and a few fixed aperture zooms. My bodies are F5, D810 and E-M1.1. The m4/3 body is the one i use for more casual imaging although it is more than capable of helping me capture stellar shots. (Example attached). I am more comfortable with my Nikon bodies when I am shooting for my portfolio.
Go to
Jan 2, 2019 10:45:10   #
I don't see any blurring, however, my eyes at 86 are getting a bit blurry themselves.
Go to
Jan 2, 2019 10:37:07   #
Sounds to me as if the mirror is not getting out of the light path. It's a job for a repair technician on the camera body not the lens.
Go to
Jan 1, 2019 15:44:51   #
Just sold my last 35mm rangefinder Kodak Retina (model IIa) as a fully functioning sweet looking user to a younger photographer who is going back to some film work again. When I was a kid in Michigan (late 1930-1945) we too called all cameras Kodaks.

By the way, as an old writer of note once penned, the reports of it's demise are somewhat premature. Among hundreds of current products are some very good ink jet photo printers. Walk in any half decent drug store and you are bound to see the word KODAK somewhere (perhaps in the small battery rack). Kodak is almost everywhere if you are really looking.
petercbrandt wrote:
Happy New Year to all of you in the UglyHedgehog country, where ever you are.

What ever happened to Kodak?

Kodak, after all, was an empire, and Kodak invented the photo chip to create digital photography.

Pictured, here is the Brownie, up to the 35mm Kodak Retina Reflex, all the way to the Kodak DCS/n (&c). I have many other Kodak’s in my collection including the fold-outs.
In Quebec Canada, cameras were referred to a Kodak, all cameras, just like Kleenex and Q-Tips.

Was it that they decided not to make Kodak Ektar lenses for the DCS, and only for Nikon and Canon lenses?

Does anyone out there know the story of why Kodak fell to bankruptcy?
What was the break point?

Sincerely
Peter Brandt
NYC
Peterbrandt.com

PS: this picture was taken with my Samsung cellphone and room lights.
Happy New Year to all of you in the UglyHedgehog c... (show quote)
Go to
Dec 31, 2018 20:31:03   #
Panatomic X was my go to film for many years and your cat photo illustrates perfectly what I truly miss in digital photography. Thanks for the reminder.
selmslie wrote:
Yes, the limiting factor for a copy or a scan is the lesser of either the original or the method used.

A proper scan should give you a better result because it's quality far exceeds the quality of the original film, even if it's medium format.

Here are a couple of examples:
Go to
Dec 31, 2018 20:03:50   #
Amazon has a third party user guide in good used condition, $8.30 plus s/h see < https://www.amazon.com/David-Buschs-Canon-Digital-Photography/dp/1435454332/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1546304339&sr=8-3&keywords=canon+5d+mark+ii+manual >
Scruples wrote:
Dear Friends: I have a C
anon 5D MII. I misplaced the user manual. I have the
WFT-E4A. I misplaced the user manual. The camera and WFT are in good condition. Does anyone have these manuals?
Go to
Dec 31, 2018 19:55:32   #
Duck Duck Go comes back with this: https://beebom.com/what-is-intel-optane-memory/
mtcoothaman wrote:
Looking at new laptops ( Dell, HP or Lenovo) I notice some have Optane memory with higher end Intel processors. From the little I can find it adds,or substitutes for,Ram- type storage and works mainly with older style disc drives, not SSD.

Has anyone had experience of this or knows more?

Thanks
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 29 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.