Posts for: CHOLLY
Jan 3, 2018 13:52:51 #
3rd party batteries DO NOT offer the same performance as Sony OEM Info-Lithium batteries. They don't last as long, give as many shots, and in some cases, aren't usable in either the cameras and or grips.....
Jan 2, 2018 23:33:54 #
^^^Unless they figure out how to crack the "Info-Lithium" patent, performance in E mount's won't match that of OEM batteries.
Jan 2, 2018 17:55:20 #
I'm thinking the NEXT generation of batteries for mirrorless cameras will perform even better.......
Jan 2, 2018 03:57:40 #
Paradigm shift in thinking and expectations....
WAIT: Sony seems to have change those expectations YET AGAIN!!!
With the new Z batteries you can have your cake AND EAT IT TOO!!!
WAIT: Sony seems to have change those expectations YET AGAIN!!!
With the new Z batteries you can have your cake AND EAT IT TOO!!!
Jan 1, 2018 23:02:00 #
Dennis833 wrote:
The answer to your question is NO. The Nikon sensor has 14% more pixels and a better dynamic 14.6 V 11.9. Put simply you will have a lot more detail in the highlights and shadows of your images. And I owned and used a 5D11 until it's death.
I don't know Dennis......
https://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Nikon-D7200-versus-Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-II___1020_483
Jan 1, 2018 15:11:25 #
Battery drain?
Not exactly DRAIN, which implies an excessive loss in voltage over a period time while the battery is not in use or in storage.
No... Mirrorless technology is much more energy intensive than what MOST of us are accustomed to with DSLR cameras. Why? Because of EVF's and LCDs used for to subject identification and framing.
OVF's don't need electricity to do their job.
But by the SAME token, OVF's are EXTREMELY limited in comparison to EVF's in the information they can impart on the photographer about the scene and or what will ACTUALLY be captured/recorded by the imaging sensor.
That factor alone makes the energy cost worth it.
BUT....
Like ALL technology, as time moves forward, desirable technology ADVANCES, hence the new "Z" batteries from Sony.
The battery life/charge holding disparity between mirrorless cameras and (the soon to be extinct) DSLR's is rapidly vanishing....
Not exactly DRAIN, which implies an excessive loss in voltage over a period time while the battery is not in use or in storage.
No... Mirrorless technology is much more energy intensive than what MOST of us are accustomed to with DSLR cameras. Why? Because of EVF's and LCDs used for to subject identification and framing.
OVF's don't need electricity to do their job.
But by the SAME token, OVF's are EXTREMELY limited in comparison to EVF's in the information they can impart on the photographer about the scene and or what will ACTUALLY be captured/recorded by the imaging sensor.
That factor alone makes the energy cost worth it.
BUT....
Like ALL technology, as time moves forward, desirable technology ADVANCES, hence the new "Z" batteries from Sony.
The battery life/charge holding disparity between mirrorless cameras and (the soon to be extinct) DSLR's is rapidly vanishing....
Dec 23, 2017 03:21:46 #
Dec 19, 2017 00:40:11 #
Dec 18, 2017 11:43:30 #
I have one for MY Canon. It is EXCELLENT for sure......
Have you tried it on your Sony E mount?
Have you tried it on your Sony E mount?
Dec 17, 2017 22:16:16 #
^^^True... but that FD 50mm is SWEET. Sharp with good contrast if it's the 1.4
Dec 17, 2017 15:38:57 #
Dec 16, 2017 12:48:53 #
I had the A7RII and ONLY used it with adapted lenses.
The image quality was OUTSTANDING to say the least.
The image quality was OUTSTANDING to say the least.
Dec 11, 2017 10:01:10 #
Dec 9, 2017 22:38:32 #
Dec 6, 2017 22:32:10 #