Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: photeach
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
Nov 7, 2014 10:22:00   #
I just Google something lame like "How do I shut off the macro focus on my Sony 6000." It usually gets me pretty close on some discussion board.
The trouble with manuals is that they EXPLAIN a certain function when you really want some sort of FAQ.
Go to
Nov 7, 2014 08:29:20   #
I find myself focusing on the numbers on their uniform shirts. It's not ideal, but the contrast in the uniform colors helps the camera focus more quickly. I'd like to focus on the eyes, but the small target isn't reliable.
Go to
Oct 31, 2014 15:28:08   #
PhotoShop Elements 12 at about $80. Use the Quick Edit to do just the easy things, the Guided Edit to follow a set of instructions, and the Full Edit when you get comfortable. The new PhotoShop Elements is 13, still under $100. The Internet has thousands of PhotoShop Elements tutorials. I also like the PhotoShop Elements 12 Book by Scott Kelby. It has lots of specific projects.

Also, try picmonkey.com to whet your appetite for ways to spice up a project. Most of it is free and lots of fun.
Go to
Oct 29, 2014 08:49:37   #
lamiaceae wrote:
Different but silly.

We do have a department of silliness at Ugly Hedgehog, don't we?
Go to
Oct 27, 2014 22:11:14   #
Love number 4!
Go to
Oct 21, 2014 08:59:02   #
If your subject is close to the camera, the bokeh is pretty easy to achieve, especially if you can open your aperture a stop or two.
Go to
Oct 21, 2014 08:01:26   #
Your photo proves the point of bokeh: to show what is important in the image by what you leave in focus. Is that light what is really important in your image? I might have moved 180 degrees and gotten the people in focus, maybe laughing at a joke, definitely not facing the camera, and had the light in the background nice and blurry. Also, I probably would have gone vertical on the image and gotten rid of that wasted space on the left.
Keep shooting. Bokeh is very addictive!
Go to
Jul 31, 2014 08:57:16   #
The story of solar energy in America is a cautionary tale about government involvement. Compare the innovations in solar to those of the computer industry, where individual innovation has brought us computer chips and iPhones. In the solar industry, government funding and rebates have kept us with the big metal boxes. The latest estimate of what it would take to generate solar energy for MY home is a $50,000 array on my roof to cover a bill that averages $100 . Really??
I read the solar energy news articles every month. I could write them by now. They ALWAYS say, "A team of researchers at (insert name) University has developed a process that has the POTENTIAL to make solar energy more efficient or more cost-effective..." But, nothing ever comes to market. The 4 x 8 foot panels never shrink to 4 x 4 or 2 x 2. The universities are just in it for the upcoming grant cycle of millions from the government.
If our computers had evolved at the same pace, we would still be using ENIAC and punch cards
Go to
Jun 4, 2014 00:43:47   #
jjbrenner wrote:
Couldn't agree more. I'm one of those older guys as well, and am really concerned about the future of all my digital images. I've got kids and grandkids that I would hope someday may enjoying seeing a part of my life as I captured it. Maybe a limited number of selected prints is the answer. Thank you for bringing up this issue. Jim

It's time to get on Shutterfly or a similar website and make a little book about an important experience. Don't let the sheer magnitude of all the experiences you could document keep you from doing "my Army experience" or "Our Colorado trip 1975." I've done 5 books now and am so happy I spent a little time sorting and uploading photos. My worst images were 1950s slides I scanned for my big sister. Scratched, faded, and some appalling double exposures, the pictures are now in a little book that is incredibly precious to her. Think how a look at the book in years to come will bring you back to your daughter.
Go to
May 6, 2014 08:02:05   #
Lensgiant.com
I have rented 4 or 5 times from them and have never been disappointed. The shipping and handling fee seems high ($18) but that is shipping to AND from you. You just have to put the lens back in the LowePro bag and rearrange the packing material. They ship via FedEx. Is there an office close to you?
Go to
Feb 14, 2014 13:40:41   #
tomw wrote:
If we could just snap in new components and upgrade our stuff, think of all the computers, TVs, phones, radios, etc. that wouldn't be junking up the landfills. Or cars, for that matter.
Not long ago someone talked about how people kept cameras for many years, buying new glass and accessories, but keeping what you have come to know and trust. My OM-1N was my camera for 25 or 30 years, and I stopped using it only when digital cameras (at about 5 MPX) got "good enough" together with the cost of film and time to process to get me to change.

Now, even expensive cameras are throw away. No longer can you improve grain or sensitivity by using different film. Now to go from 8 megapixels to 16, you throw away your camera and buy a new one. And while new features are trumpeted, how much do they really add, once we had auto-focus and auto-exposure which could be used or disabled?

Should we demand industry standard sensors which can snap in and out like a 35mm canister, and let us upgrade rather than discard? Is it more odd to be able to use a Nikon sensor in a Canon camera than to use Kodak film in a Fuji camera? Or a Tamron lens on a Pentax?

Sensor changes would require a software upgrade as well, but we already do that as required.
If we could just snap in new components and upgra... (show quote)
Go to
Feb 13, 2014 08:10:25   #
I have the D3100. It's a nimble camera -- capable of working with different lenses for different situations. It's not intimidating so you can practice with the settings and learn your way around it. That new price is great, too, on the D3200.
Go to
Feb 4, 2014 10:30:38   #
Bunko.T wrote:
My grandfather took hundreds of B&W pics nearly 100 yrs ago. I've scanned the negs & found a valuable record of local history in fantastic photos.
There are many of people. I searched for families of these folks & had some success, much to the joy of those families.
If he took pics of birds or pet cats or dogs, I'm sure I wouldn't be interested in them now.
Photos of people & places have some lasting attraction historically.
I've been through my own photos from my working & travelling days & found so much interest in the changes within my life time.

Others have found them interesting also. Very gratifying.
So depending on what you record determines whether or not they get dumped when you reach your use by date.
My grandfather took hundreds of B&W pics nearl... (show quote)


Have you thought about presenting some to your local historical society?
Go to
Feb 4, 2014 10:29:05   #
Marn wrote:
There is mention of photogrphers the shoot hundreds of photos a week. After they spend too much of their lives at the computer, what do they do with all of them.
I've been shoot ing for more than 50 years, and lately find myself asking what am I going to do with this picture I'm about to take.
I already have thousands of slides and in my computer.


Your dilemma gave me an idea for a similar problem.
My mother was a folk artist and painted hundreds of tin and wooden objects. I have a large collection and a larger collection of her photographs of things she sold. What to do with hundreds of fading photos?
I am going to pull out similar photos, scan them and make an inexpensive photo book. Twenty pages with some multiple photos and a little explanatory copy should meet my objective: To explain my mother's artistry to generations to come. I may do several to show different facets of her work, or work she did for family members. I may make a book of my collection before it gets divided amongst my children.
Isn't this what you want -- to leave a record of a great trip or a great shot you are proud of? Isn't that why we take photos? Despite all technological advances, I think a book is still the most accessible communication with the future.
The first one will be the most laborious, and you'll have to remind yourself that you won't cover everything, just the high points. And if you really get anal about it, you can load your originals with a few (I SAID A FEW) extras on an SD card and put it in a plastic pocket in the back of your book.
I am so excited about this idea that I may use part of my precious snow day today (10 inches expected) to sort out some photos. Good luck to you!
Go to
Dec 12, 2013 10:33:17   #
Wow! You did a terrific job holding your camera still enough to get a reasonable photo, given the zoom length. I wish I had been there. Going to the Vatican is on my bucket list. Ignore the bigoted remarks.
maxdowns wrote:
We were in Rome and were at the back of the area where the Pope was speaking. I have put a photo from where we were standing and an arrow shows where the Pope is sitting. From the very same spot I zoomed in on the man. Granted there is a lot of noise in the picture of the Pope but the fact that the zoom could get me this picture from this distance is simple amazing to me.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.