Oops..missed the 'preview check' before sending.
Exif data says Nikon D300, not X 2. Just did a quick enhance of the dark jpeg image. While not thorough, it does give an sense of the differences between the info contained in the raw vs the remaining info after conversion to jpg in-camera.
xt2 wrote:
Raw is great, esapecially when you have lots of time or inclination to work in post flow at a computer, I get it! I use a D800, Trinity set-up that would have yielded me the same initial photo, however I also use a Fiji XT2 (now much more of the time, raw & jpeg) and the original photo would not even had made it to its sensor because of the fantastic technology that is afforded by the EVF. These danged little mirrorless cameras are simply putting my âbig rigâ out to pasture for anything less than massive blow-up photos (which are far and few between in my current world).
Raw is great, esapecially when you have lots of ti... (
show quote)