Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Bloke
Page: <<prev 1 ... 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 ... 181 next>>
Nov 17, 2013 15:13:54   #
dragonswing wrote:
I love dewdrop pictures. So cool to get a reflection inside.


Yeah, I love the droplet shot!
Go to
Nov 17, 2013 15:10:55   #
Mabarker wrote:
Everyone needs to experience the California Redwoods in their life. I call them, "Nature's Cathedral". Then I thought to throw in my horse's path to the upper pasture just for the heck of it.


I agree about the Redwoods... I passed through the area back in 2001, and took some pictures. Here is a self-portrait I took. This was taken from a miniDV video tape, so the resolution and quality leaves a bit to be desired. Still like it, though!

Me and a tree...

Go to
Nov 17, 2013 15:06:26   #
CAM1017 wrote:
Very nice work! Wish I knew the meaning of the different colors in the stars. I realize it represents the material in the stars but do not know what it is. :thumbup:


The colour of the stars is an indication of their temperature, with blue being the hottest and red the coolest (everything is relative, of course!). As they evolve, the stars pass through different phases, and this changes their size and colour. In about 5 billion years (on a tuesday...) the sun will bloat up to become a red giant, probably big enough to swallow the Earth's orbit within it. Then, some millions of years later, it will blow off the outer layers, and the core will become a very small, *very* hot white dwarf.

Also, these stars are not likely to be more than a few dozen light-years away. Very few individual stars are visible more than a couple of hundred light-years off. If you get up into the millions, then you are talking about another galaxy, and you won't see individual stars in them - unless you discover a new supernova!
Go to
Nov 17, 2013 14:46:41   #
vsidles wrote:
Hi, my name is Vicki. I am from FL and I am the mother of five grown kids, Gramma to one beautiful 4yr old, wife, still work full time but love digital photography. I just got into it really as a hobby since my granddaughter was born. Probably the most photographed kid ever. I liked it better when she couldn't tell me NO MORE PICTURES GRAMMA!
I have a question for the forum. I am very inexperienced and my husband wants to get me my first dslr camera. It's either the Canon T3 bundle or the Nikon D3200 bundle. I am leaning more towards the Nikon only because I have used the Nikon of my son's - he had it pre-set for me. Any suggestions? Thank you very much.
Hi, my name is Vicki. I am from FL and I am the mo... (show quote)


Nice pictures! Welcome, and post lots more... Beautiful girls, and you have the lighting just right. Not much help on the question, as I have never had a dslr. I used canon film slrs, but also some nikon from time to time. I agree with the other posts, that either of the two will do you proud - not to mention the 'lesser' brands... :shock:
Go to
Nov 17, 2013 14:25:07   #
Gives an idea why they cost such a fortune, doesn't it?
Go to
Nov 16, 2013 23:02:59   #
Elliern wrote:
Thank you, that is kind. (it is the first photo I ever posted anywhere)

Yes, I did crop it and I kinda used a tripod. I don't attach my sx50 to my tripod, but I set it on it to steady the camera. I only have one attachment plate for my tripod and it is connected to my dslr at the moment. I only turned off my IS once. Probably because I don't actually attach it to the tripod, the IS on is fine. I also have rested my camera on the outdoor stairway... in fact any time I can rest it on a stationary item I do. I also rest my body or arms against a building, tree or anything solid. However, most of the time I just hand hold the camera, "smashing" it into my face.
I am still learning how to use the sx50, but it sure is fun to use. I love taking photos of flowers, insects and birds. And it is so nice to grab it and go. I have been taking pictures with it every day since I got it about 6 weeks ago.

I have never used the digital zoom. On clear nights when the moon seems closer, I go out and take about 3 photos each on various settings: manual, av, tv and even did some in sports mode. Then I select the best one to crop and 'maybe' use the clarity or light or shadow adjustment in LR. I am not experienced at all in LR and can only do very basic adjustments. So I only keep photos that are pretty sharp to begin with. I plan to take a LR class in Jan. and will watch the tutorial that someone posted earlier today.

I bought a Manfrotto tripod that was on sale at Best Buy for under a $100. It is light but sturdy enough for my cameras.
Thank you, that is kind. (it is the first photo I... (show quote)


Well, I think you should post some more!

I have a really cheap tripod, which at the moment is 'dedicated' to my camcorder. I want to get a better one, as soon as the finances recover from the purchase of the camera!

I have always read that the digital zoom is to be avoided, but I have seen some shots on here from other SX50s, where the results have been pretty good. I want to try using it, and comparing the results with not using it and cropping in. Trouble is, mine is turned off and I can't find how to turn it back on. I really *hate* the pdf manual, and have been struggling to find out how to turn this back on. It is greyed out on my menu, and the book doesn't mention this - at least in the bits I have found so far!

I want to try my hand at the macro stuff, too...
Go to
Nov 16, 2013 12:03:26   #
Elliern wrote:
Did this one with my Sx 50 a few nights ago. Settings using Tv mode, I think. iso 400 1/320 f 6.5


Ok, now this is interesting. You are using the same camera as I am, but your shot is *so* much better. I assume that you used a tripod? Did you use the digital zoom, or was this cropped?

I have so much to learn about this camera! It is a marvellous little beastie, though, isn't it?

Another thing I just heard for the first time on a training video, is about turning off IS when on a tripod. I don't have a decent tripod yet, but does turning off the IS really make a difference?
Go to
Nov 16, 2013 12:00:33   #
wcj0 wrote:
wasn't bragging about the equipment i use, only trying to show the settings used and therefore had to list the equipment used. Thanks!


I know... Sorry, I was just making excuses about my effort, that's all. I would *love* to have my hands on equipment like yours, but it is way outside my financial boundaries. Having said that, I am having a ball with my little sx50! I have used film slrs (Canon A1, Nikon F2) back in the dim and distant past, but since then have been stuck using a P&S. This thing is *way* better, and of course has a *ton* more capability than any camera did back then.

It still blows my mind that I can shoot all day, without having to carry around a bag full of film!
Go to
Nov 16, 2013 11:55:21   #
kaerophil wrote:
It looks like all three exposures are too bright, so they are not capturing a blue sky. Try resetting so only one shot is slightly overexposed, one is underexposed, and one is on a normal setting.


Yeah, these were 1 stop apart, but taken by the auto-bracketing in camera. I turned it on by accident...
Go to
Nov 16, 2013 10:00:09   #
wcj0 wrote:
This was shot with a Canon 1DsMIII, EF600 VII, 2x Canon tele, f/8, 1/100sec, ISO 100 in Manual and PP in Lightroom 5. on a tripod and gimbal head


Wow! Kinda puts mine to shame a bit. Nice shot! Of course, my camera probably cost less than your tripod... :-D
Go to
Nov 16, 2013 09:58:10   #
DaveMM wrote:
What is your problem? For many, it is overexposure. If you allow the camera to set the exposure, it will try and make the sky light, so the moon is vastly overexposed.

Remember the moon is in full sunlight, so should have a similar exposure to a fully sunlit subject. 1/125 at f/11 or f/16 and 100 ISO seems a good starting point.


Hardly an expert, having only tried this once myself - so far! However, if you shoot when the moon is up during daylight, there is not so much of a contrast issue, and the camera's exposure will not overblow the moon so much.
It should be easy enough to darken the sky in PP, if that's the look you want, but personally, I think it looks better in a dark blue sky rather than full black.

SX50, 1200mm handheld, around 4PM local time a few days ago

Go to
Nov 16, 2013 09:49:35   #
Camerabuff wrote:
You haven't said if your using raw or JPEG if it's in raw try using camera raw free download from adobe web site.


I just looked there, and there are a whole bunch of *updates* for camera raw, but no actual versions listed. I am using CS2 (hopefully CS3 any day now), so how can I be sure that I am getting the right one? There are lots of them!
Go to
Nov 15, 2013 22:01:15   #
Armadillo wrote:
Bloke,

This image has two problems; the horse moved during the three exposures, and the camera moved during the exposures. Look closely at 100% size, and notice the green rail at the bottom.

If your HDR software can show you three previews in Thumbnail images you will be able to preview all three exposures and see the movement between the three. If your HDR software will allow you to remove image content from an individual image you can remove most of the movement (select the over-exposed image first)

After the merge the ghost may be gone.

Another thing you can do, while waiting for the tripod, connect the remote shutter release, place the camera on a sturdy support (car hood, tree stump, fence post, something that will provide 3 point support), and make your three exposures with the shutter release cable. Make sure you set Exposure compensation for at least .63Ev.

Have a real good time, you will have a lot to learn.

Michael G
Bloke, br br This image has two problems; the hor... (show quote)


Oh yes, I know that! My last 'serious' camera was a Canon A1, back in the 80s... I'm pretty good in the darkroom, but the digital world is just, well, different!

I'm not going to spend a lot of time working on these first couple ot attempts. I like them, especially for handheld images, but there are too many things to put right for them to ever be 'good'. I just wanted to put them out there as an introduction, so to speak

Thanks for the tips.
Go to
Nov 15, 2013 18:46:06   #
jdubu wrote:
That is the crux of the problem when purchasing a used PS for qualifying for CC.

If you don't specify that that copy of PS is deactivated on all of the sellers computers and unregistered, you are SOL.


Yeah, I am finding this out. The seller responded, and said that he had asked adobe about this before listing it, and they had assured him that it wasn't. Anyway, he says he will do it for me.

Then, there is another issue... The automatic sign-up for the Photography Program wouldn't accept it, and this was before the registration issue came up. Apparently, there is a chance that this is an educational version, and they don't qualify. It would have been nice to have known that in advance, wouldn't it? There is nothing on the dvd or package to indicate whether it is or not. So, I have to get the registration thing sorted out, then go back and try to sign up once again. If not, I am going to be unhappy...

I wouldn't have minded too much buying a more up-to-date version, but even on ebay they are expensive. I paid $75 for this, which is a lot when you are on disability. I certainly wouldn't have bothered, just to upgrade from CS2 to CS3...

This was probably the only chance I would ever have of actually having access to a current version of PS... :hunf:
Go to
Nov 15, 2013 17:59:08   #
Armadillo wrote:
Bloke,

This last time you uploaded the image files for viewing, not for download. This stripped out all the image information the camera saved inside the image file.

Your ghosting was caused by camera movement during the three exposures, you will need to mount the camera on a tripod to make HDR captures. (It would also help to have a remote shutter release cable to prevent minor camera movement at the instant you press the shutter button). You will also have to be very sure there is no subject movement in the scene while making the 3 exposures. (If your HDR processing software has the tools to erase offending subject movement, you can try editing out cars, people, animals, and swaying trees during the HDR merge process).

Michael G
Bloke, br br This last time you uploaded the imag... (show quote)


I'm sorry, I thought I had checked the box again...

I know that I need a tripod. I have one, but it isn't a good one... That will be upgraded as soon as finances allow. I also have the cable release. It's just one of those things I want to try a bit more. I didn't expect these to be great, because like I said, it was just that the camera was taking the bracketed exposures. I tried to keep it still, but when you look at the 3 shots in quick succession, you can see that there is movement. Once I get myself set up, I will do more of these. Here is the one I was talking about, with the horse that has 2 noses... He moved a bit between the exposures, and I must have too, if you look at the top bar of the gate.

Given the obvious flaws, though, I still like this one!


Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 ... 181 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.