Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: joer
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 next>>
Jul 19, 2013 13:31:11   #
one of many


Go to
Jul 19, 2013 08:56:41   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Someone mentioned how expensive Nikon lenses are and wondered about their pricing strategy. Here's a similar situation of Name Brand vs Aftermarket.

Almost two years ago, I replaced the thermostatic fan switch on my son's Civic. It cost $65 from the Honda dealer. A couple of days ago, the switch went bad again. Doubting that Honda had lowered its prices in the past two years, I looked on Amazon. I found a Beck/Arnley switch for $17, delivered. Beck/Arnley has been around for years and makes parts for just about everything, so I have confidence that it will last for at least the 21 months that the Honda item lasted.
Someone mentioned how expensive Nikon lenses are a... (show quote)


I spent many years in a after market industry. You would be surprised how many OEMs bought our parts and passed them off as their own.
Go to
Jul 18, 2013 10:19:34   #
Wahawk wrote:
Picasa will view and edit many 'raw' photos also.


Thanks, I didn't know that. Haven't used it in awhile.


Go to
Jul 17, 2013 14:35:42   #
buckwheat wrote:
A while back I asked about any experience with Model Mayhem. I received several replies, and I thank you. I met a young lady and we did an outside shoot in the desert, and you can see my problem. I did not have an assistant, I did not have reflectors, and I did not use fill flash. Now that we know the original mistakes I made, does anyone have any post processing suggestions to alter the highlight/shadow that makes her nose look like Jimmy Durante's. Yes she has a big nose, but I didn't really have to magnify it.
I'm storing original, and all you PP masters can have a go at it. (And Captain C, since this was just for fun and at no cost, I can trash the photo, but can it be saved?"
A while back I asked about any experience with Mod... (show quote)


You might be able to save it with Portrait Professional 11.
Go to
Jul 17, 2013 14:24:11   #
RTFM wrote:
You can put Nikon lenses on a Canon but not the other way round.


I bought an adaptor to mount the Nikon 500 f4 (manual focus)on the Canon 5D II. Image quality was unacceptable to me.
Go to
Jul 17, 2013 14:09:32   #
jgdean wrote:
My computer flat lined last week an even though a tech was able to get my machine back to working, none of my photos files will open. It seems as though most files were corrupted.
I have a Lenovo Idea Pad, Windows 7... any help will be appreciated.


Sandisk offers a recovery program with its Extreme Pro cards. It is free for the 1st year.
Go to
Jul 17, 2013 14:03:19   #
BillA77V wrote:
I have inherited a large collection of Gold, Silver and Copper coins which I am going to try an photograph. The intent is to get the best resolution possible for a catalog to distribute in a PDF.
I am not having much luck with the lighting and detail. The macro seems to be doing it's job, I'm just not getting the lighting.
Should I use a light table as some online sources suggest? Use background? Is there a better way?


Assuming you have a flash, bounce it off a white surface (reflector or ceiling).
Go to
Jul 17, 2013 13:58:49   #
bsrhea05 wrote:
what seems to be the best picture editing program ? I have used photo shop 7 and really liked it but have lost it.....I need another program to take its place.....and don't want to pay a big price ! Any suggestions..... :roll:


If you don't need raw conversion Picasa is simple, effective and free.
Go to
Jul 17, 2013 13:49:46   #
ecobin wrote:
Yes, try a blower first - the rocket blower is good - don't use canned compressed air as the propellant could damage the sensor. If the dust isn't removed then you'll need to do a wet cleaning - there are several good kits available.


I don't find the rocket blower very affective. Compressed air works better but you need to hold the can at the proper distance and upright to avoid clouding from the propellant.
Sensor swabs are some what affective and outrageously expensive. I've made my own device using eclipse solutions and pec-pads.

I don't look for dust until it shows in my photos.
Go to
Jul 17, 2013 11:23:23   #
Hammer wrote:
Hi,

Rosemarie , my wife is getting more and more interested in photography.

However , she has some issues that mean a heavy camera is out of the question. A D5100 + 18-200 lens is just too much for her.

Have been looking at some of the high end P & S , like the Panasonic TZ40. Looked at the Coolpix, got confused. Features like GPS, a flip out screen and "point" at the object to focus on would be good .

No doubt this is not a new problem so can any of you Hoggers suggest a suitable camera for my dearly beloved (or my wife) ?

Thanks for your help.
Hi, br br Rosemarie , my wife is getting more and... (show quote)


There are so many excellent cameras available today that the choice really depends on how complex you want to go and your budget. My suggestions are:

1. Don't be concerned with pixel count. Go for the largest sensor size (ex: 1:1.7) within your budget. 10 MP is more than adequate.
2. The lens is very important. Generally, the greater the zoom range the poorer the image quality. Definitely get a zoom.
3. Shutter lag is important. You'll miss a lot of shots otherwise.
4. Avoid interchangeable lens cameras. They are great for some people, but not for most.
5. Don't forget the flash. More power is better.
6. Don't buy the latest and greatest. The models that they replace can be just as good and are better values.

My preference is Canon or Nikon which seem to hold their value better than most. Nikons are usually more feature rich which can be a plus or a minus. I recommend the Canon G15 or the Nikon P7100.

Let your wife decide. If she doesn't like your choice you'll never hear the end of it.

Good Luck
Go to
Jul 11, 2013 11:07:31   #
Moray wrote:
I am looking for a lens and have narrowed it down to the Canon 70-200 F/4 L USM and the Canon EF 28-135mm F/3.5-5.6 IS USM.
The 70-200 is not the IS model.
I want a lens to be ready for a shot of a building , a car, a person etc just a general walk around lens. I lean to the 28-135 for the IS but it is not a L lens and for close to te same money I can get the 70-200 L but not IS. Does anyone use this lens for handheld shooting and with what results.
Is the quality of the L lens twice as great as the non L lens?
I do not want to have to tripod up all the time but would I get great quality pics with the 28-135? I did search the forum and didn't see too much on the 28-135.
Thanks for your valued informtion .
I am looking for a lens and have narrowed it down ... (show quote)


Is or no IS does not make the lens. In my opinion the 70-200 is a much better lens, but 28-135 is better suited as a walk around lens. Its really apples to oranges.
Go to
Jul 11, 2013 11:00:46   #
fthomas wrote:
As I peruse the images and comments I notice a lot of photographs receiving praise and wonder though they are not cohesive in composition and exposure. They are nice "Pic's" , but do they really reach the level of images we could all go out and find on Photo.net or any number of places. There are amazing and gifted photographers using Canon 40 or 50D's and kits lenses to make some terrific images if not stunning!

How could we raise the bar for quality (I'm including me in this by all means and actually was beating myself up as I worked on a number images that I knew could have been better!) on UHH?

Does the bar need to be raised? Do we need to be a encouragement and example to others when possible? I think the answer is yes! Do we need to hold each other to higher standard in order to encourage improvement for us all?

Thoughts!
As I peruse the images and comments I notice a lot... (show quote)


Amateur photography is about the love for the craft. If you are please with the result then what others think is irrelevant.
Go to
Jul 11, 2013 10:56:43   #
recon wrote:
Greetings, I still have many different lens from the nikon and cannon "film" cameras.neither one of the film camers work good anymore. Will any of them fit on the newer digital nikon & canon cameras?
Am not sure what ti do with the older cameras that dont really work.
Alot if money is tied up in all the different lens.
Thanks fir your input and direction, richard


Depending on their age they may fit but limit the functionality of the camera. Its hard to say without knowing the specifics.
Go to
Jul 11, 2013 10:49:38   #
CAS1951 wrote:
I have a Canon 5DMII that I purchased in December 2011. When should I start taking it in for a sensor cleaning? I've never seen "artifacts" in any of my photos and it is self cleaning. Thank you for any advice.


There is no need to look for dust. It will find you.
Cleaning can be frustrating and most of the tools available are expensive and/or worthless.
Go to
Jul 11, 2013 10:44:16   #
mariak wrote:
Could I please borrow some wisdom from those who are more experienced than I? I was about to buy a 50mm 1.8 for my 5200 when it occurred to me that with the crop factor of 1.5 I wouldn't really be getting anything like the film 50mm. So would the 35mm be a better idea. Prices are about the same.
Thank you for any information you can share.
mariak


Skip the primes and get a good normal zoom. It will improve your photography and save money in the long run.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.