Bayou wrote:
Mirrorless cameras of the same sensor size are only marginally lighter than DSLR. Yes, the bodies are considerably smaller and a bit lighter, but the lenses are essentially the same bulk and weight. (not to mention the cost of all new lenses) To truly save weight you'd have to go forgo full frame altogether, and maybe even DX depending on your personal limitations. M4/3 is out there and very light and compact, though not much to choose from.
If you already own DX lenses you know how much lighter they are than the FX. A D3500 or D7500 with true DX lenses would cut your average weight a great deal over the D850 and FX lenses, probably more than half. While it's no fun going backwards with regard to features, if weight gets to be a real problem, that may be the way to go.
Mirrorless cameras of the same sensor size are onl... (
show quote)
Thanks, I have considered that and have tried stepping back previously. For now, I will stick with my current gear and rely more on my Cotton Carrier and tactics to reduce the time I have to carry and hike to get the picture I want. I guess I have to accept that I am getting older and my disabilities will never improve. My favorite subject has always been the Landscape... It is sad but a fact of life. I am thankful that I have had several years in which I could walk and carry my D850 with a single lens while pulling my collapsible wagon... I still have many National Parks with accessible places to shoot..... Just an attitude adjustment and maybe a new Nikon to dream about for fun....