Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Posts for: Weddingguy
Page: <<prev 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 166 next>>
Aug 8, 2018 22:09:45   #
. . . and if you are going through St. John, stop and see the reversing falls . . . fascinating!
Go to
Aug 8, 2018 22:08:46   #
MTG44 wrote:
Turo,Halifax, Cape Breton,can't miss.


That would be Truro
Go to
Aug 8, 2018 18:44:18   #
Ooooops! . . . and another one bites the dust!


(Download)
Go to
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Aug 8, 2018 16:54:25   #
E.L.. Shapiro wrote:
Do the deal! Come up to Canada- the people are friendly, the culture is diverse and the Maritime Provinces are a photographer's wonderland. The food's good too! In most parts of Nova Scotia you just need to stand in one place and rotate in a 360 degree arc and just about everything is photogenic! We have stronger booze and beer! The Maritimes are the place to shoot unless you are not into quaint settings, lighthouses, old stuff, all kids of cool watercraft and seascapes. The government does not allow all kinds of billboards and clutter on the roads too! Your US bucks are worth about 30% more on a good day.

Come soon- before someone builds as "wall"!

If you have the eye, we've got the place!
Do the deal! Come up to Canada- the people are fr... (show quote)


You bet!! . . . Nova Scotia is a right good place to be!
Go to
Aug 8, 2018 15:19:20   #
[quote=bobmcculloch]It's not a done deal yet but the wife and I are thinking about driving to Nova Scotia, want to see the Bay of Fundy and Peggy's Cove, that's basically the only things on the menu right now, looking for advice, places to add to the itinerary, and general knowledge, Thanks in advance if I don't say it later, Bob.[/quote


Raised in Nova Scotia until age 19. It is the 2nd most beautiful province in Canada . . . you can't run out of things to see unless you are blind in one eye and can't see out of the other! ENJOY!
Go to
Aug 6, 2018 18:44:30   #
User ID wrote:
`



...... and, are you listening ?
Do you agree with yourself ?
And if not, why not ?


I think the internet is full enough of weirdos without having them infiltrate a photo forum, hiding behind a "dot" and being from nowhere. Personally I'll just dodge conversations containing weirdos. Carry on "."
Go to
Aug 6, 2018 17:39:24   #
User ID wrote:
`


What is your User ID ? Are we talking to ourselves?
Go to
Check out People Photography section of our forum.
Aug 6, 2018 15:52:40   #
User ID wrote:
Flash diffusers is a 100% case of "Size DOES matter" :-)

You would hafta rig up some sort of "mirror periscope"
to get the flash beam up and away and into the diffuser.
IOW "in your dreams" only.

`


There you go . . . the Lite Genius Peri-Scoop . . . the mirrored tube with the diffuser on top . . . up-up and away from the camera!


(Download)
Go to
Aug 6, 2018 13:53:28   #
alvineng501 wrote:
I currently have items from Lumiquest to use with my Nikon Speedlites to soften images taken with those Speedlites. Anyone have any success softening images taken with smaller point and shoot Compact Cameras?


The replies above pretty well cover the fact that a "pop-up" flash on a point and shoot camera just does not have enough power to modify or manipulate. If your "point & shoot" has a hot shoe, then a hot shoe flash can be added with the extra power needed for effective modifiers.

The best suggestions above are . . .

"You can also trigger an off camera speedlight or mono light that has an optical trigger."

"A more practical way would be to put your Nikon Speedlites in slave mode triggered by the P&S flash and either get some good modifiers for them or bounce them off large white surfaces (wall, ceiling, folder-up reflector, etc.). Cumbersome, but doable."


I can add to these by suggesting that the pop-up flash be diverted to another direction or reduced with tissue so that it does not compete with the light of the off-camera slave flashes. The light from the pop-up should be used only to fire the slaves.
Go to
Aug 5, 2018 17:13:09   #
RonM12 wrote:
I’ve owned several Nikon dslr’s, last year I purchased a D850 and I couldn’t be more pleased with it. Now, with Nikon announcing their soon to be released mirrorless camera I can’t help but think I should have held off, especially since I’ve purchased this a couple extra lens afterwards. It is what it is and since I like landscape and wildlife photography the D850 should serve me well for a number of years. And, if their adapter to allow F mount lenses to the mirrorless bodies functions as it should, all will not be lost. I have to wonder if the D850 and D5 will be the last of their dslr’s?
I’ve owned several Nikon dslr’s, last year I purch... (show quote)


If you wait to get the latest/greatest of anything in the electronics or photography field . . . you will never buy anything! Checking what's available after you've made the purchase of your choice is called "lookin' up the donkey's butt!"
Go to
Aug 3, 2018 13:32:18   #
#9 for creativity!
Go to
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Jul 30, 2018 11:35:12   #
Congrats Jim-Pops . . . nice job!
Go to
Jul 27, 2018 15:39:20   #
#2 . . . . nicely done!
Go to
Jul 26, 2018 14:03:06   #
Digger1 wrote:
Your point #2 is well taken - you have a duty to the couple. If that is what they ordered, so be it. This was sort of a new church with fewer rules. The times are changing.

Thank you for commenting.


Agree with almost all of bkyser's statements . . . but I don't think times are changing all that much.

I shot my first wedding in 1960 . . . and the last one last month. With hundreds of weddings under my belt, I have only been restricted from using flash twice. In both cases the brides and grooms were extremely unhappy, and had they known before booking the church and paying their deposits, would have chosen different venues. After all . . . they were their weddings and not that of the officiates.
Over the years there was a number of "churches" that had restrictions that were easily persuaded to allow flash from the pro photographers only, with just a little negotiation. In fact, it is not the rule of the "churches", but that of the officiates who love to control. (I'll probably catch some flack for that statement)

I think that what we all have to keep in mind, as photographers or guests, is that the wedding is for the bride and groom. The photographers have to remember that they are not the most important part of the event . . . and the guests are not invited to critique the choices of the bride and groom, but to share the joy of the day.

Just my humble opinion of course . . .
Go to
Jul 23, 2018 11:25:55   #
Very nice job! Congrats!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 166 next>>
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.