Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: ecobin
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 next>>
Jul 17, 2012 13:40:15   #
Vivitar makes auto extension tubes for Nikon and they're metal - got very good reviews on Amazon and only $90 for the set. I'm interested in getting an auto set and would also like recommendations from those who use them.
Go to
Jul 17, 2012 09:22:36   #
I just called our local Ritz camera store and they are not closing. No other information was available - I guess they are restructuring and keeping the higher volume stores open - nothing on sale in my location either.
Go to
Jul 17, 2012 09:14:22   #
jerryc41 wrote:
So you're saying I'm unclean? :D I agree with that opbservation, but for $7.99, you can't beat the price. I'm going to keep the dock by my computer so I can easily use several drives, and keep the wiring attached to another drive. My wife and son each have a computer, so this will be an easy way to keep their stuff backed up, in addition to my external drives. I'm always afraid that my backups will fail. That often happened in the days of 3 1/2" floppies.


Ha! Most of my stuff is wireless now - I hated all those wires and was really glad to get rid of them when I got an iMac in 2010. There's still a bunch (for router, scanner, usb extender, etc.) under my desk but out of sight!
Go to
Jul 17, 2012 08:48:10   #
jimberton wrote:
here's the device i use for external sata drives. i have one like yours for old ide drives and it hooks to the newer sata drives.

this unit is great..you can hot swap drives. i have about 50 external sata drives and use 3 of these. no muss...no fuss. i bought mine at tiger direct. these only work on sata drives, not ide drives.

jim



That's pretty cool - haven't seen that but I could see that being the best system for multiple old hard drives. I've removed a few drives from old laptops and bought cases for them - the cases come with a usb cord. This is much cleaner than Jerry's rig when you only have a few drives (the cases I bought were $6 to $10 and very sturdy). This makes them portable - it's like having a large thumb drive.
Go to
Jul 15, 2012 11:46:46   #
drydock wrote:
I would be interested in getting opinions on which format to use for my forthcoming overseas trip.

As a relatively new inductee into the world of DSLR photography, I have taken with gusto to the world of taking photos with RAW and processing in lightroom 4.

I have realised that all RAW images need post processing and wondered how fellow members handled large volumes of images. I wold imagine that I will end up with hundreds of images from my vacation, all potentially needing processing. I work full time and do not have unlimited time to spend "playing" on my computer.

Should I only take RAW images, RAW+JPEG or JPEG alone. Logically, the second option would give me the the best of both worlds, but would require a lot of memory.

Your opinions please!!
I would be interested in getting opinions on which... (show quote)


Even if a large majority or your shots are "perfect" there are likely to be some that will require some post-processing. Post-processing raw files is infinitely better than post-processing jpg files. All of my keepers require some work - I only shoot raw everywhere.
Go to
Jul 15, 2012 11:38:25   #
Michael O' wrote:
Martineff, using a camera body with the full equivalent of a 35 mm digital capture will increase the pixels by roughly 1.6 times, providing much greater resolution for any given lens affixed ahead of it. From there you can go to better glass is you need greater yet resolution for bigger blowups. Yet the greatest difference will show up from the greater digital capture area. I believe Steve R references this same general maxim.


The pixel count is fixed based on the camera's sensor - it never changes. Any lens put on a 1.6 crop sensor camera will operate as if it were 1.6 x the lens mm on a full frame sensor camera - so the 35mm lens on this camera is equivalent to about 56mm lens on a full frame camera. The number of pixels are the same. Better glass will provide sharper images and could improve other issues such as CC.
Go to
Jul 14, 2012 09:35:33   #
[quote=martinneff]I currenly use a Sony DSLR with a kit lens. To maximize sharpness for 16x20 and larger prints am I better off purchasing a better lens or a camera with a larger sensor(35mm equivalent) assuming I am already using a tripod and maximizing DOF?[/quote

Rent a good quality lens to see if that makes a significant improvement. That should enable you to make the right decision.
Go to
Jul 13, 2012 21:52:04   #
glojo wrote:

I am an amateur snapper that aims, shoots and fires, this is a hand held cropped image of a Red Tailed Buzzard


That's a wow! I'd like to know what lens you used.
Go to
Jul 13, 2012 21:43:56   #
Stevieboy wrote:
of what I believe are called "bridge Cameras" such as the Canon SX 40 with a zoom range of something like 24 -840?

How do they compare to using a DSLR with an L lens?

How might the image quality compare to let's say a 7D with a 70-200L?

Much appreciated,

Steve


Steve, the Canon SX 40 is a really nice light weight "all purpose" camera - probably the best bridge camera currently available. It's limitations are that you cannot use another lens, its output is only jpeg - no raw capability so that puts limitations on post-processing, no external flash capability, and many other differences from a dslr - too many to list. So it depends on what you want. My wife and both daughters like taking photos and wanted a better camera than their old point & shoots but didn't want the heavy bulky dslr and have no intention of doing any post processing other than eliminating red eye and cropping and some other tweaks. So two years ago I got all three the Canon SX 30is (the predecessor to the SX 40). They all take really nice photos and the camera suits them well. It's also a great second camera to always have with you and as a backup to a dslr - I've used my wife's camera when I'm too lazy to get mine out (not very often). If you're not sure about your passion for photography yet then the SX 40 is a good camera to wet your appetite!
Go to
Jul 13, 2012 16:00:41   #
AVarley wrote:
ecobin wrote:

BTW - I've done much worse - last year we went to Africa and I bought my wife a Canon SX 30is which she loves. To "help" her I went through the menus and set it up - big mistake, I should have let her do it - I enabled the date stamp, which it turns out is fairly large on that camera. After taking over 3,000 pictures she realized that the date stamp was really there and not just on the lcd screen - she was furious with me - I promised to remove it in photoshop on any that she requested - well I've probably done several hundred and taken many many hours - good learning experience in Photoshop - some were very difficult.
So, your error doesn't come close to mine! Hope you feel better!
br BTW - I've done much worse - last year we went... (show quote)


...no doubt in my mind whatsoever: YOU WIN!

(If I had been she, I may have considered feeding you to a lion or something :D )
quote=ecobin br BTW - I've done much worse - las... (show quote)


I like winning!! But will never do that again - probably something else just as stupid.
Go to
Jul 13, 2012 14:34:51   #
shutterbug sue wrote:
ecobin wrote:

Ha - I'm having a rotten day at work and you made me laugh - thank you. At least you are experimenting with your camera and learning its capabilities - kudos to you! Keep it up.
You're welcome, glad I could make you laugh! Hope the rest of your day is better! :)


BTW - I've done much worse - last year we went to Africa and I bought my wife a Canon SX 30is which she loves. To "help" her I went through the menus and set it up - big mistake, I should have let her do it - I enabled the date stamp, which it turns out is fairly large on that camera. After taking over 3,000 pictures she realized that the date stamp was really there and not just on the lcd screen - she was furious with me - I promised to remove it in photoshop on any that she requested - well I've probably done several hundred and taken many many hours - good learning experience in Photoshop - some were very difficult.
So, your error doesn't come close to mine! Hope you feel better!
Go to
Jul 13, 2012 13:03:06   #
shutterbug sue wrote:
I was playing around with the buttons on my Nikon D300 and somehow put it in bracketing mode 1 full stop apart. Next day when I was taking pictures I couldn't figure out why most of them were either underexposed or overexposed. I was getting so frustrated that I had to take about 7 pictures of each scene to get one shot that was well exposed. My family was even more frustrated! My husband was making comments like "that person only had to take one picture with a point and shoot camera." The worst part is that I was at Glacier National Park when this happened so missed getting a lot of good shots. Of course I didn't have my manual with me and didn't figure out the problem until after I got home. Boo Hoo :(
I was playing around with the buttons on my Nikon ... (show quote)


Ha - I'm having a rotten day at work and you made me laugh - thank you. At least you are experimenting with your camera and learning its capabilities - kudos to you! Keep it up.
Go to
Jul 12, 2012 17:19:01   #
MT Shooter wrote:
Actually I am a new owner of the Better Beamer attachment and have not used it in the field yet, but am looking forward to it. Since it is recommended for 300mm and longer lenses, I wanted to rig up a mount that would make it work on those lenses without shadowing the shot and that is what I came up with. It velcro mounts so I can also use it on my 300mm F2.8 just as well.


I figured that was the reason for moving the flash forward but can't see what coupling you used on the flash - you have a shoe that you can thread the velcro through? Nice job.
Go to
Jul 12, 2012 16:38:41   #
MT Shooter wrote:
You mean something like this?
This is my Better Beamer flash extender mounted on my 800mm F5.6 lens.


Wow! Please post some photos using that rig. Don't go near any military bases with that or we may not hear from you again!
Go to
Jul 12, 2012 09:33:29   #
In addition to the advice given so far you should use manual focus. The camera autofocus will often be confused by trying to focus on the window, close branches, etc. You'll hear the focuc motor going in & out. I suggest that for close to the road subjects that you set the manual focus to 30-50 ft depending on the road and at infinity for distance focusing. You'll also need to pan as the bus moves otherwise it will be blurred. I got some good shot when traveling on a bus through Costa Rica last year using these suggestions. Have a great trip.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.