Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: suntouched
Page: <<prev 1 ... 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 ... 234 next>>
Sep 26, 2017 15:46:24   #
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
Ditto for me. Ironically, I found it to be too small. I ended up with the XE2s.


Me too! I could not adapt to the small size with no grip (to speak of). I found myself holding it by the lens. And I wanted to like it- a lot! It was 400.00 cheaper than the X-T2.
Go to
Sep 26, 2017 12:59:30   #
Exceptional!
Go to
Sep 26, 2017 11:18:22   #
Great image, easy to use-
Try it on for size before you buy- I found it physically uncomfortable to use.
Go to
Sep 26, 2017 10:06:58   #
Huge improvement! Pleasant scene worth the work to save. Wonder if adding a vignette would decrease the highlights in the foreground?
Go to
Sep 26, 2017 10:01:05   #
The broken down house in the background compliments the old truck nicely!
Interesting and well done!
Go to
Sep 26, 2017 09:55:05   #
Nalu wrote:
Thanks for looking Suntouched. Yes, I will definitely be printing some of these and others, but I have never had anything printed on "metal". I am curious, what do you think is the advantage as compared to printing on a high grade photo paper? I will check it out on Google, but would be curious on your thoughts. Thanks again!


Metal is more expensive (initially) but gives a lot of pop to colorful images and they come ready to hang without having to mat and frame.
I think metal highlights the image - cleaner and simpler and more modern looking than traditional framing. I don't suggest it for all images but think it works for those images that can stand on their own. I think both crab images would look great in metal.
Go to
Sep 26, 2017 09:34:43   #
I think you got your money's worth, whatever the cost:) All were excellent but the crab under water was phenomenal! I can see that printed on metal...
Go to
Sep 25, 2017 09:16:29   #
I use mirrorless and DSLRs. They both have their advantages. In my mind it doesn't have to be an either/or.
The tiny mirrorless cameras did not work for me ergonomically. However when I selected larger mirrorless bodies it clicked.
Not all mirrorless cameras have "tiny sensors". The Fuji X-T2 has the same sensor size as your Nikon D7100. Same as the Sony a6000. Sony makes mirrorless cameras with full size sensors.
I agree (with mirrorless) it was a sharp learning curve but once you learn the basics of one it's much easier to learn another brand since they share similar technologies.
Go to
Sep 24, 2017 22:13:59   #
I too use Bridge, Camera Raw and PS and OnOne. In Bridge you can move files from folder to folder to folder and Bridge can see it in the new location. With LR it was drama drama drama and tears of frustration trying to figure out why I couldn't find/see a photo or several photos and then the time it took to reorganize everything again-a mess! In Bridge I organize my folders by categories, subcategories, physical location and year. Pretty simple and intuitive for me.
Go to
Sep 24, 2017 09:28:54   #
Beautiful-Did you video it too?
Go to
Sep 23, 2017 12:30:48   #
For pickup only- in Salem Oregon (shipping would cost about 100.00)

For anyone that might be interested-

Although I no longer have the original box I do have the Epson connection cord and instruction manual. Last night I reloaded the printer driver via the Epson site (to my newest computer) and then fired up the printer and all works well. Printer prints up to 17x22". It has a special mode for B&W images. There are 8 cartridges which are partially filled and one extra that hasn't been opened. Out of the 8 cartridges, about 4 get used sooner than the rest although this printer is extremely ink thrifty overall.

Epson papers and ink for this printer are readily available via the Epson site as well as third party suppliers.
This printer is still sold new.

I used this printer quite a bit at one time but I rarely print from home anymore.

Printer- asking 225.00
Printer table- 50.00
Extra paper- 40.00












Go to
Sep 22, 2017 21:40:28   #
imagemeister wrote:
My browser will not let me see the pictures - for fear of downloading viruses .....but I will give your request some thought on my own .....


Imagemeister-if you searched the site on your own instead of following a link would you be able to see the images?

What I hope to be able to use is the Fuji X-T2 with a couple of primes and the 50-230 mm lens and the Nikon 7500 with the 50 mm and new 70-300 mm lens and the
Pentax K 3- ll with the 12-24 mm lens. All of the lenses are under 26.5 ounces and most are much lighter. Most are stabilized.
Thank you!
Go to
Sep 22, 2017 19:32:35   #
imagemeister wrote:
My Bodypod would work pretty good and so would this -
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Body-Mount-Supporter-Best-for-Canon-EF-70-200mm-f-2-8L-IS-II-USM/332365907328?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649


I have seen both of the body pods you have listed as well as cotton carrier with their version and bracket. All would certainly work however I will be using a smaller mirrorless camera with smaller lens so think I would prefer the DIY version due to its low profile and simple, unobtrusive design and probably lighter weight. I will paste the web site with photos here and hopefully you will be able to see it- images and all. Thank you for getting back to me :)

Oops - forgot the link

http://www.instructables.com/id/Supporting-a-dSLR-camera-on-your-chest/
Go to
Sep 22, 2017 17:12:21   #
jimneotech wrote:
This seems like it would work great for you but only if you have had surgery on the the left rotator cuff.


It's the left one.
Go to
Sep 22, 2017 12:49:43   #
Bill- yes the metal hinge is what keeps me from putting it together. I'm not sure how the Oben tilt head would fit in place of the hinge- and it adds another 10 ounces of weight but certainly worth considering.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 ... 234 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.