Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: CraigFair
Page: <<prev 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 445 next>>
Apr 20, 2018 17:13:24   #
bwana wrote:
Here are the original wide-field frames for M51 and M104 off the Astro-Tech 65EDQ scope and Horizon camera, i.e.: the starting point for the other images in this thread.

Enjoy!

bwa

That's insane Brian they are both beautiful.
Are you using 60 sec subs? Is that true?
I imagine you are still using the ATIK software?
And there's no way I can count all the Galaxies.
Craig
PS: I am getting this camera!!!
Go to
Apr 17, 2018 12:43:14   #
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
Thank you Craig.
I don't suppose you ever got a chance to play with a solar scope yet?
Jim

No I didn't get to play with the Solar Scope. It belongs to the college and Vince is not comfortable taking it off campus.
Craig
Go to
Apr 16, 2018 13:09:23   #
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
Yesterday the sun finally gave me something to shoot during the day.
Most of the activity lately has been at night for me and day for someone else.
This is with the Lunt 60mm H-Alpha scope
Tracking with the Celestron CGEM mount and imaged with the Celestron 236M camera.
I shot for 2 minutes and 50 frames per second.
I processed 25% of the frames after stacking in Autostakkert.
I processed the image in ImPPG inversed and colorized it in Photoshop.
Jim

Very interesting Proms Jim, well done.
Craig
Go to
Apr 16, 2018 13:04:30   #
melueth wrote:
I finally got this shot closer to what i've been hoping for, except for the trees! Took 100 shots of the sky at 25 seconds each, ISO 200, 12mm lens on my Sony A6000. The one shot of the house was shot separately, at just 15 seconds, ISO 100. After some tweaks in LR, i exported them all to jpg, then opened as layers in PS. Removing plane trails took a long time, and there's still some ghosts left, but so it goes! Comments welcome.

Marylea

Very well done Marylea.
Craig
Go to
Apr 15, 2018 03:39:11   #
JimH123 wrote:
Tonight I continued my exploring the use of the Orion 5376 Paragon-Plus Binocular Mount and got out the Celestron SkyMaster 15x70's. First thing I noticed was that they were a bit out of collimation, but I found a YouTube on doing the collimation and it turned out to be a very easy thing to do.

The night sky looked great though these binoculars and I was easily seeing stars approaching 10th magnitude as I followed what I was doing with Stellarium Mobile. The stars were nice pinpoints and I liked what I was seeing. By the way, my glasses are progressive, and for this, I have a pair that is not progressive, and that works best with viewing. Since I have astigmatism, I can't get nice pinpoints when not using my glasses. But I remember back when I was a teenager, more than half a century ago, looking at the night sky with an el cheapo 3 1/2 inch reflector from Edmond Scientific and at that time, I didn't have astigmatism and I still remember the impressive view of the stars. I wish I could see them that good now.

I also decided to do some comparison so I got out a spotting scope I have - a Celestron Regal 100mm, 540mm FL. Comes with a zoom 22x to 66x, actually 8mm to 24mm. But I substituted a Baader 24mm Hyperion which provides a 68 degree apparent field of view. The actual field of view was narrower than the 15x binoculars, but it provided a reasonable way to compare. Also with this scope and eyepiece, the stars looked perfect and it was a joy to look through.

In the way of comparison, the scope was a bit more sensitive to dim stars, but not by much. With a little math using the area of circles, the scope has an area of about 1.7x the area of one of the binocular lenses. But the binocular views with both eyes, and somewhere I read that using both eyes vs one is a 1.4x advantage. So you can see that the net result is very close. Plus, I was using a slightly higher magnification on the scope than the binoculars -- 22x vs 15x. And this also gave it a slight advantage.

Using the scope, I could see the companion star of Mintaka, the far right end of the belt of Orion. These stars are separated by 1 arc minute, and it was no problem separating them with the scope. A little harder with the binoculars.

Tried again to see the horse head nebula but couldn't see it with either the binoculars or the scope. And comparing to the dim stars in Stellarium, I was able to know exactly where it shoud be. Need the light gathering ability of a camera for that.

Now what I may try next is mounting the scope on the Paragon Mount. The scope doesn't exceed it's weight limit, and it would make viewing more convenient since I have to adjust my viewing heigth with the scope on a tripod when I aim higher or lower. Also, need to use a red dot finder since it is really hard to aim that scope where you want.

Tonight, my fun was interrupted by my noticing that stars were becoming dimmer and dimmer. When I looked up, the sky had managed to cloud up. It was perfectly clear when I started.
Tonight I continued my exploring the use of the Or... (show quote)

Hi Jim H, I too was having some great seeing and by 10:00 PM the clouds moved in. No images tonight we were just doing visuals with the club's 14". The Polemaster alignment worked perfectly and we didn't have to do any additional Stars. It's on a Pier so our level is fixed and true. Our RA / DEC setup was also still right on. Go To was also right on.
Craig
Go to
Apr 15, 2018 03:21:28   #
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
Double post. You must be getting forgetful in your retirement.
;o)
Jim

I use my phone and computer so when I use one it doesn't highlight the title on the other. So I may Post twice on 1 title. Sorry.
Craig
Go to
Apr 14, 2018 17:45:56   #
JimH123 wrote:
The UPS truck delivered it today, and the weather cooperated. I know this is not astrophotography, but it just made my observing a lot easier. Used it tonight with my 10x50 binoculars and what a difference to look through steady binoculars. Next, I will try it with the 15x70 that are so big and heavy that I have hardly ever used them.

Now I need to dig out the books I have on binocular objects to observe.

I tried resolving the Horse Head Nebula tonight, but at 10x, it was beyond my ability to see it with binoculars.
The UPS truck delivered it today, and the weather ... (show quote)

Well done Jim H.
Craig
Go to
Apr 14, 2018 17:43:40   #
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
This time I tried using the modified Canon T2i that I bought from Craig a while back.
I used my all time favorite Celestron C8 SCT that I have added a crayford focus back to.
I setup the CGEM and had a nice clean PoleMaster alignment to work with.
I used the focus mask and had a really pretty, even, 6 point star.
I did a 2 star alignment and added 3 calibration stars to the mix.
I ran my exposures as follows.
ISO 800 (seems to be best for this camera)
Fixed f:/10 ( no reducer )
150 second exposure this time.
Processed in Canon Photo Professional and saved as a PNG
I opened that up in Photoshop and adjusted the white balanc ite and contrast.
This is what I got.
I need to run it through Topaz noise reduction.
:o)
Jim
This time I tried using the modified Canon T2i tha... (show quote)

Beautifully done Jim. I had no idea that I was selling you such a great camera. Hahaha. Yes I did!!!
Craig
Go to
Apr 14, 2018 17:42:11   #
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
This time I tried using the modified Canon T2i that I bought from Craig a while back.
I used my all time favorite Celestron C8 SCT that I have added a crayford focus back to.
I setup the CGEM and had a nice clean PoleMaster alignment to work with.
I used the focus mask and had a really pretty, even, 6 point star.
I did a 2 star alignment and added 3 calibration stars to the mix.
I ran my exposures as follows.
ISO 800 (seems to be best for this camera)
Fixed f:/10 ( no reducer )
150 second exposure this time.
Processed in Canon Photo Professional and saved as a PNG
I opened that up in Photoshop and adjusted the white balance and contrast.
This is what I got.
I need to run it through Topaz noise reduction.
:o)
Jim
This time I tried using the modified Canon T2i tha... (show quote)

Beautifully done Jim. I had no idea that I was selling you such a great camera. Hahaha. Yes I did!!!
Craig
Go to
Apr 14, 2018 17:36:13   #
JimH123 wrote:
I haven't bought a PoleMaster yet, but from I read about it, that it can get the pole alignment done accurately enough that a one-star alignment is all that is necessary. Can anyone confirm that this is correct?

I would think that it's possible. I just did the Polemaster alignment on the 14" Celestron SCT scope last night and will be doing a 4 star tonight. I'll let you know if it works Jim. It's on a fixed pedistal. If the RA & DEC setup are right then the alignment again should be good. Once I check mine I can just Park the scope and I will be good from now on.
Craig
Go to
Apr 12, 2018 20:02:55   #
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
Thanks Craig.
I wanted to try something new and was very pleased with the results.

You may want to try the 11" on this one. Hahaha.
Craig
Go to
Apr 12, 2018 12:01:07   #
Menkaure wrote:
I thought about buying that kind of rig but I bought a house instead!

Menkaure, you surely have not caught the bug yet. Hahaha

Craig
Go to
Apr 12, 2018 11:00:59   #
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
Played two nights ago and finally processed the results.
This was the night I played with the 6” Celestron. Cropped for detail by almost 50%.
Jim

Nicely done Jim, it is a little project.
Craig
Go to
Apr 11, 2018 16:44:56   #
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
I have never seen them so I’m hoping someone in our group can.
There’s a pretty large hole in the solar corona sphere letting the electrons out.

http://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/latest48.php?q=0193

Good luck to Brian with the lights. And great find Jim, very interesting.
Craig
Go to
Apr 11, 2018 16:38:59   #
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
And this is why I haven’t jumped into auto guiding yet.
Looks really clean Ed.
Jim

Hey Jim, theoretically you would only have 2 cables from scope to computer, camera and guide scope. That's all I have anyway.
Craig
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... 445 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.