Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: TonyP
Page: <<prev 1 ... 112 113 114 115 116 next>>
Nov 7, 2012 14:21:54   #
Here in NZ the greengrocer supplies ones' groceries in thin, strong opaque plastic bags. I always carry one or two in my kit along with a couple of rubber bands. Put the camera and lens in the bag with the lens poking out, then fix with the rubber band around the lens. Water and sand proof - works a treat for me.
Go to
Nov 5, 2012 15:04:58   #
Kuranui wrote:
Hi all. This looks like a great forum. The photos I have seen so far have been lovely. I look forward to viewing more and posting some of my own.


And another welcome, I'm from Tauranga. Seem to have more and more of us NZers popping up here. Hope you enjoy. Cheers
Go to
Nov 2, 2012 16:35:38   #
mack45 wrote:
After 45 years in the Canadian labour force I can retire from my sawmill job and do not need to ever do labour to earn a living again.
I am testing a 26 of Glayva out for to see what is at the bottom. I am just going to go to college for a year and see what works from there on.
I am taking courses in computer technologies.


Well done mack45. I was fortunate enough to 'retire' 10 years ago. A mate who retired a few years before me warned me to have heaps to occupy myself or risk going barmy. He was right. It is so important to plan the years ahead as carefully as when you were working. And enjoy.
Go to
Nov 2, 2012 15:29:19   #
PhotoArtsLA wrote:
When shooting nature and animals, generally there is no need to hold down the shutter and take 6-8 frames per second. Not only does continuous motor drive shooting produce many useless shots, it does not train you. Knowing your surrounding, knowing your animal, and knowing your composition and exposure can create a better picture with only a few clicks at most.

I shot picture below with, as I recall, with a total of three frames. "National Geographic" liked it and published it.

In the second shot of the crow attacking the hawk, I used my motor drive in the way we used to discuss its purpose: motor drives, back in the days of film, kept your eye on the viewfinder, without the hassle of using your thumb to wind the film camera to the next shot. Motor drives allow you to follow action, and shoot only when the time is right. This crow/hawk shot occurred above my Daylight Shooting Stage, and I was simply flexing my old, manual focus skills on an ancient, pre autofocus anything 300/2.8.
When shooting nature and animals, generally there ... (show quote)


Fantastic pics. You wouldn't have had a lot of time to bracket a hundred or so either ;)
Go to
Nov 2, 2012 15:20:49   #
You are right saichiez. Couldn't agree more. :thumbup:
Go to
Oct 31, 2012 16:53:08   #
I think the definition of 'Photographer' is both a technical question and perhaps an emotive one as well. Having migrated 80% to Digital only a few years ago (after more than 50 years of using film), I still struggle with the machine gunner like attitude of many on this site who think nothing of taking 500 (or more) shots a day and then creating their masterpiece with the assistance of Photoshop or its ilk. I read here the other day of someone that proudly asserted they took 15,000 shots a year and their wife took likewise. (Imagine the storage required if shooting RAW files). I have to admit I have difficulty calling these people photographers. Here in NZ, I understand the NZPA (New Zealand Professional Photographers Association) is considering identifying Digital 'Photographers' (sic) as Digital Imagemakers. Have a look at this link for anothers excellent take on the subject http://w:ww.gallery464.co.nz/decisive%20moment%20to%20the%20created%20moment.html. For those who don't want to read the full article I direct you to the final para.
" The potential of photography, as we know it, is in danger if nobody is teaching a photography aesthetic, preferring, as it would seem is the case to instead teach how to use technology more than how to use ones mind and eye! "
Have to agree with this sentiment :)
Go to
Oct 29, 2012 16:50:22   #
energizerdel wrote:
I'm hoping someone here can help me. I like the effect that so many people have when they blur waterfalls, oceans etc, but have tried over and over without any success. I have a Canon 20D, have used a low ISO, small aperture, slow speed, etc etc - all the advice everyone gives, plus have used a ND8 filter and yet still can't get the effect and have no idea what I'm doing wrong. Photos are still coming out extremely over exposed. Any suggestions would be really appreciated. Thanks.


Depending on volume and speed of water about 1/4sec (bracket either way). Focus important on actual water. This was 1/5th sec at f32. Never had to resort to filters myself but tripod or something for support is a good idea. (I carry a small padded 6" sq cushion with sponge in it my wife made and use this as a support when I forget the t/pod.) Don't forget to disconnect the VR if you are a Nikon user. With the best intentions VR seems to stuff up these effects. (Mind you, if using a tripod the VR should be off anyway). Hope this helps.

McLaren Falls

Go to
Oct 18, 2012 16:55:49   #
jerryc41 wrote:
LouEllen wrote:
You missed your cue. That's when you should have added, "And stupid people". :-)

Lou Ellen

I said "people in general," so I thought I had my bases covered. Expect the worst of people, and you will never be disappointed.


That's a rather unfortunate attitude jerryc41. :thumbdown:
Go to
Sep 16, 2012 15:43:39   #
BboH wrote:
The Nikon D300 series, D3 series, the D800 series are the ones I know of.


No not the D300 Series. Just the D300s and yes, you can save NEF files to one card and jpeg to the other, tho I find it more convenient just to use the second card for overflow.
Go to
Sep 16, 2012 05:35:31   #
Nikonian72 wrote:
Because of the recent discussions of saving raw images to one card, and JPGs to a second card, which cameras are capable of doing this?


D300s
Go to
Sep 13, 2012 04:45:12   #
chapjohn wrote:
I am looking for advice about to stay in the club or not stay.

The incident is that I emailed my images 3 days before the deadline to get them in for the judging night. The person who recieves these images says he did not recieve mine. He did not change email address and he recieved all my pictures last year. My computer shows the email as "sent." I get this impression that I am not being told the whole story about my images. I sent two flowers, fireworks, sun rays through tree leaves, and a multi-layered waterfall. I tell you that to show that there was nothing risque or objectionable.

My first thoughts are that I am done with this group, I can do many other things on Monday nights. Then I wonder if I am being to quick to respond this way?

I appreciate your advice on handling this situation. Thank you.
I am looking for advice about to stay in the club ... (show quote)


Hi mate, I may not have read every post in reply so apologies if someone else has covered this aspect. But, I wonder if there is a subset here. One of the problems with email is that it is replacing speech. Face to face or even the telephone. I wonder if you have perhaps felt some sort of undercurrents at the Club meetings and now your pics going missing is just another nail in the relationship with the person involved. Have you actually, verbally, discussed the situation with him? I gather the Club is bigger than just this one guy so perhaps its something that you should discuss, out in the open, at the next Club meeting. I do think a quick resignation from the Club would be overkill if you enjoy the Club environment and the friendship with most members. Network with other members outside of Club night and get their opinion. I think you have many options before you resign. Unless of course you are looking for an excuse to do so. Just my pennyworth. Cheers (and good luck).
Go to
Sep 7, 2012 16:24:15   #
Hi Monica. I am new here as well but the site is loaded with interesting people with a real diversity of knowledge and opinions. Enjoy.
Go to
Sep 7, 2012 16:22:28   #
I'm pretty new here as well. Enjoy.
Go to
Sep 7, 2012 15:47:39   #
Hal81 wrote:
Welcome aboard.


Thanks Hal.
Go to
Sep 6, 2012 17:17:56   #
gnu37 wrote:
Hi from Wainuiomata,welcome to a great site,always something of interest.


Thanks gnu37. Was born and lived in Wellington for many years. Used to go hunting over the back of Wainui (about 45 years ago!!). Bet its changed, a lot, since then :-)
Cheers
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 112 113 114 115 116 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.