Mr. Brown looked at some of your work on Flickr, personally I dont think the lens can take the credit but the old hippy behind it!
Great photographs and we as a country should feel for the native american indian tribes!
For all of you that did not read the original question or statement, he was at a CAR SHOW don’t think he went there with the plan to take photos of children. He took a photo a child that he thought would make a good photograph. Then the mother went all helicopter on him and got the police that trampled his rights.
This is the point if we stop doing things that are legal because someone person does something bad with the same thing we want be able to do much, (buy guns, knives, tooth brushes, fertilizer for the lawns kerosene for heaters, nails, screws, cars all of these have the potential to do harm and have done so, and how in world are we getting rid of all the stones that will fit into a sling or bigger to be THROWN.)Just about anything good can be used for bad, I do not think we should give in. By the way someone wanting to do harm with a photo of a child has to look no further than moms Facebook, Instagram, are any social media no internet for us either. DON’T BLAME STREET PHOTOGRAPHERS FOR INDSENT PHOTOS ! I am neither a professional, nor street photographer but if I saw a child in public about to do something cute or miraculous I would take the photo and then use common sense.
Great photos would like to know camera, lens and settings ?
Welcome and thanks for sharing great photo.
This horse has been beaten to death, you can’t take a candid photo of someone after you have asked permission because they are not going to act the same, probably the reason you wanted to take the photo in the first place it just doesn’t happen. Some street photographers make their living doing this. Street photographers keep on clicking and be respectful of others. As for the rest of us do what you are comfortable with. He originally asked about the law!
Do I need permission before I take someone’s photograph?
Not at all. There are no laws preventing photography of people, children, buildings, objects or anything else in a public place, or in any place open to the public where photography is not expressly prohibited. There is no expectation of privacy in a public place. But don’t be a pest, and don’t get in anyone’s way or cause an obstruction – if you’re overly persistent you could face a harassment charge (most usually this will be the province of the more aggressive realms of the paparazzi).
http://lindsaydobsonphotography.com/blog/photographing-people-and-children-in-public-places/
May help
https://www.clickinmoms.com/blog/street-photography-and-the-law-7-things-you-need-to-know/
First off you have no right of privacy in a public place.
This may help answer your queston
https://www.clickinmoms.com/blog/street-photography-and-the-law-7-things-you-need-to-know/
You might give this a try.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/buy/Lens-Adapters/ci/9365/N/3544148311
Chevman
I would like to know if scanned a print, photograph a print or had the negative placed on a disk ? Or if any UHH thinks one process is best.
Must be about 63 , GREAT CATCH
Thank all for you help, we are putting up some safeguards and see what happens for a couple months.