Captured with a Sony A7R V camera and Astro-Tech 65EDQ scope with a Hutech HEUIB-II filter on a Celestron Evolution mount; 67x30 sec. subs @ ISO3200.
Alignment, stacking and initial stretch done in PixInsight. The remainder of the postprocessing was done in Lightroom and Photoshop (A-P).
The first image shows the full frame image. The second image concentrates on Markarian's Chain at the top of the field-of-view.
Enjoy!
bwa
Captured with a Sony A7R V camera and Astro-Tech 65EDQ scope with a Hutech HEUIB-II filter on a Celestron Evolution mount; 66x30 sec. subs @ ISO3200.
Alignment, stacking and initial stretch done in PixInsight. The remainder of the postprocessing was done in Lightroom and Photoshop (A-P). Colorized to some extent.
Enjoy!
bwa
Rongnongno wrote:
The progress is in the sensor, nowhere else.
The idea of using a display instead of through the lens is reverting to old time when folks were looking from above to focus...
Issues with the display...
- LIGHT!!! If too bright, good luck using the display.
- Eyes issue If one needs glasses all bets are off, there is no way to adjust for that but use the tiny in camera display in the 'view finder'. Go check for accuracy on that since the display is made of tiny pixels vs 'a normal light' (analog)
- Weight unbalance. (Light body, heavy lens)
That is one of the few reasons why I will not upgrade to mirrorless, even if I do appreciate the new sensors.
The progress is in the sensor, nowhere else. br b... (
show quote)
Ever heard of a viewfinder!?
bwa
Used a QHY462C camera and Astro-Tech 65EDQ telescope with a Hershel Wedge and Baader K-Line filter, mounted on an Evolution mount.
Shot several video sessions of 1000 frames each and processed for the best ten frames in PIPP then manually picked the best of the best for final postprocessing in Lightroom/Photoshop. Several sessions with a 2.5x PowerMate and one without. I tried a 5x PowerMate but the atmosphere was not co-operative!
A couple of LARGE active areas coming around the left edge of ol' Sol. They should make for some interesting imaging over the next week or so and maybe some Aurora activity as well.
Enjoy!
bwa
Pano of two sessions w/ no PowerMate
(
Download)
With 2.5x PowerMate
With 2.5x PowerMate
With 2.5x PowerMate
With 2.5x PowerMate
Retired CPO wrote:
Thank you for the info! Endlessly fascinating work!
So, if I'm understanding this correctly, if one was to be parked alongside this galaxy in a really fast car with light speed capability. At one end or the other. It would take 300,000 years (three hundred thousand years!) to get to the other end at top speed. Of ONE galaxy!
If that's right, it's pretty obvious that any serious exploring of the Universe will require FTL (faster than light) speed! WARP SPEED, engage!!
Actually, I don't think "speed" is a term that can be used to describe that kind of motion!
Thank you for the info! Endlessly fascinating work... (
show quote)
But first it would take you 35 million years to get to the galaxy before you could start your test...
then it would take another 300,000 years to travel from one end to the other. You could start with the Milky Way, it is only 100,000-120,000 light-years wide. A much shorter trip would be Earth to Sun; 8 light minutes.
This kind of mental exercise may explain why we haven't seen any aliens in the neighborhood, i.e.: they haven't developed FTL travel either!
However, I believe I've found civilizations in the Andromeda galaxy, a mere 2.5 million light-years away. All those blue areas, about 3/4's of the way out from the core, show light pollution!
bwa
Captured with a Sony A7R V camera and Astro-Tech 65EDQ scope with a Lumicon Deep Sky filter on a Celestron Evolution mount; 112x30 sec. subs @ ISO3200.
Alignment, stacking and initial stretch done in PixInsight. The remainder of the postprocessing was done in Lightroom and Photoshop (A-P).
If you look closely at this image you'll see at least two, probably three, additional small galaxies.
Enjoy!
bwa
alberio wrote:
Nice image of the Rosette. Looks like there is lots more nebulosity surrounding the main object.
I'll shoot it again when the weather is a bit better...
For the present here is another attempt at the processing...
bwa
Loaded my (unmodded) Sony A7R V camera and Astro-Tech 65EDQ scope with a Lumicon Deep Sky filter on a Celestron Evolution mount and shot 245x15 sec. subs (~1 hour) @ ISO3200 of the Rosette Nebula.
I fought cloud most of the session and ultimately discarded 73 subs due to 'foggy' stars.
Alignment, stacking and initial stretch done in PixInsight. The remainder of the postprocessing was done in Lightroom and Photoshop (A-P).
Enjoy!
bwa
A reasonable day for some solar imaging.
Used a QHY462C camera and Astro-Tech 65EDQ telescope with a Hershel Wedge and Baader K-Line filter, mounted on an Evolution mount.
Shot two video sessions of 1000 frames each and processed for the best ten frames in PIPP then manually picked the best of the best for final postprocessing in Lightroom/Photoshop. One session with a 2.5x PowerMate and one without.
Not much happening on Ol' Sol today so a good day to play with settings, etc. I found a better way to focus on solar features by accident. I was having problems seeing anything on my laptop monitor due to bright sunshine and a white t-shirt so attached an external Desview monitor. It had Focus Peaking functionality which made getting a good focus quite easy. Gotta remember this for future solar and lunar imaging.
Enjoy!
bwa
jerryc41 wrote:
I don't mind donating to worthwhile charities and causes. But - I don't like it when they state a minimum of $25 or $50. Assuming thousands of people nationwide are donating, even a dollar would help. I can imagine people hesitating if the minimum donation is $25. The charity gets nothing instead of $10.
I'm posting this because I just received a link from a friend to donate to a hospital. The minimum is $25, but the suggested amount is $50. I realize that $25 isn't a lot of money, but I think it would hold some people back.
My son recently brought a jar of coins to the coin machine at the bank. It contained $285, and that was just from "loose change." It all adds up.
I don't mind donating to worthwhile charities and ... (
show quote)
By the time administration costs, CEO costs, etc., ad nauseam are consider, most charities are simply a money grab! I don't trust any of them to do any good for their so called causes.
bwa
lyndacast wrote:
I am a Nikon shooter and was excited to put the Tamron z 150-500mm lens on my z50. I was ready to do more wildlife and birds in flight photography until I spent some time with this beautiful beast….it is too darn heavy for me to hold still and I am not inclined to lug a tripod around when I get the urge to shoot some wildlife when I am close to nature. At 75 I admit I am not as strong as I’d like and holding that lens isn’t getting easier.
So I am returning it to Adorama today and exchanging it for the Sony cyber shot RX10 IV. I guess a bridge camera isn’t so bad….(right?)…..and it sure will make my sometimes forays into nature a little easier. I just hope I don’t have pangs of regret and envy when I encounter folks with those big, beautiful telephoto lens in the field.🥹
I am a Nikon shooter and was excited to put the Ta... (
show quote)
You'll be very happy with RX10 IV
bwa
alberio wrote:
I have to keep an eye open for rattlesnakes, scorpions, centipedes Gila Monsters, did I mention rattlesnakes?
All of those would freeze to death up here...
bwa