Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: CatMarley
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 292 next>>
Nov 7, 2019 11:39:11   #
dick ranez wrote:
You get what you pay for, whiskey, women or cameras.


Nonsense. Ever heard of the law of diminishing returns? How much "better" is the image from an $11,000 camera than from a $2000 camera? Is it 5 and a half times better? If not, you are not getting what you paid for!
Go to
Nov 7, 2019 11:16:44   #
nervous2 wrote:
I occasionally smile at posts from new members whose first question is “what camera should I purchase.” I’m not quite in the same boat but now I too have the question, “what camera should I purchase.” I have the greatest respect for the skill and knowledge of fellow hedgehoggers and I am hoping that once again they can help me avoid a decision that I later regret. I have owned and enjoyed the Nikon D70s, D7000 and more recently two D7100s. I have more lenses than you can shake a stick at—mostly DX but a few FX as well. So, as I am about to upgrade once again, I am torn between the D500 and the D850. I will most likely never use all the capability of either of those cameras, but I will enjoy owning and shooting with either—so, which one? Because of the plethora of DX lenses that I have acquired, I had been leaning towards the D500, although I have often thought it would be interesting to move towards full-frame. Now, however, I read on Ken Rockwell’s site that the D850 “works with DX lenses and automatically crops to the central part of its sensor (and shows a smaller frame in the finder) to give 19MP DX shots." Thus, I would have time to transition to a collection of FX glass and still be able to use my current collection of DX lenses in the meanwhile. (And I will keep one of the D7100s as a backup.) If I were to purchase the D500, I would probably buy the Nikkor 16-80 f/2.8-4 E lens to go with it. For the D850 I was going to pair it with the Nikkor 24-120 f/4 lens although in reading the Rockwell analysis, he seems to prefer the Nikkor 28-300 f/3.5-5.6 G given that a single lens covers so much more territory. Any thoughts on which of these would be appreciated as well. A final consideration is that fortunately, I am able to afford either of the two cameras. Having said that, no one likes to make a mistake where a fairly large expenditure is being made. Please be patient in your responses. I have done quite a bit of reading but, again, I have great respect for the community knowledge of my friends. Thank you for your help.
I occasionally smile at posts from new members who... (show quote)


I think you have answered your own question in pointing out that your DX AND FX lenses both can be used on the 850 and the 500 but on the 850 you have the full FX benefit. More is better, right?
Go to
Nov 1, 2019 23:07:42   #
rmalarz wrote:
I see no reason for having this lens. So, I'm not on a waiting list.
--Bob


Oh Bob, don't you want to be the baddest man in the mob? It is the ultimate in GAS! Taking portraits in the dark, what could be cooler? Only $8000!
Go to
Nov 1, 2019 23:00:27   #
iamimdoc wrote:
Are the current Nikon sale prices pretty good for a D500 and D7500? Are they once a year?

How would folks compare the quality of the 180140 lens that can come with the sales cameras vs an older 18-200 VR lens? ie, it's "on sale" too and is it a good lens and is the price pretty good?

Thanks


I don't know about the 18-140, but the 18-200 was a very nice little lens. I just about never took it off my camera - so versatile. I miss it now that I gave away all my Nikon stuff.
Go to
Oct 29, 2019 12:19:14   #
Ken8895 wrote:
I'm starting to get a little more serious about photography and decided to treat myself to my 1st decent camera for Christmas. What is your personal preferences? I'm researching nikkon and cannon. Budget is between $500-1000 including a lens, which I know depends on the type of photo I will be shooting. Curious to hear your thoughts and if possible give a low end and a high end suggestion with my budget. Thanks for your input in advance


https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1423549-REG/fujifilm_x_t20_digital_camera_with.html
Go to
Oct 26, 2019 00:49:56   #
Bill P wrote:
I'll remind you what I said onan earlier thread. I've used when I was working for pay, flash outdoors a lot. I found that in or out, TTL flash was at best a crapshoot. With nikon, Leica or Panasonic I found it to be more reliable using the sensor in the strobe And setting the camera manually.


That is strange. I have found that TTL, combined with some experience with that particular camera and unit and knowing what compensations for reflectivity are necessary in a particular shot is quite reliable. Maybe my choice of camera and flash units have been dumb luck.
Go to
Oct 25, 2019 09:08:36   #
GoofyNewfie wrote:
I really like Nikon’s speedlights, but for off camera use, a radio remote is invaluable.
I’m loving my Godox (Adorama Flashpoint) lights.
Built-in radio transceivers and a ton of accessories and light options.
On the upper end for Godox speedlights, the V1 is amazing. Really long battery life.


I second the Godox nomination. Good performance, modest price, best value.
Go to
Oct 18, 2019 13:01:57   #
selmslie wrote:
Yes, you do have a choice. You can choose an ISO that is compatible with the light that is shining on the subject.


In answer to my remark which was in response to "rapidly changing light and rapid movement" You offer photos of static flowers as a refutation of my statement. Apples and oranges! There are situations, and they are rare in most people's photographic assays, when there is no choice but to let the camera decide the exposure because things are happening and changing faster than the camera operator can compensate, and the incident light measurement is not going to produce adequate illumination of a particular subject.
Go to
Oct 18, 2019 11:41:49   #
Notorious T.O.D. wrote:
Unless you are shooting rapidly changing action...


Then you have to depend on some automatic settings, and with modern processors, noise, at most all ISO settings is not a major issue. With rapid action, you are using a set shutter speed and usually, set aperture as well. You really have no other choice but to use auto ISO! No use considering disadvantages when it is the only choice you have!
Go to
Oct 18, 2019 09:52:40   #
will47 wrote:
I was just doing some reading about Auto ISO. What drawbacks, if any, are encountered by using this on a regular basis?


So much struggling with exposure! And a camera with a good EVF solves all those mysteries. You look in your viewfinder and twiddle the little knobs until it looks good and Voila! . . . perfect exposure.
Go to
Oct 17, 2019 13:34:23   #
wdross wrote:
I disagree with it has to be a medical issue or factor. And next year I will be able to shoot with the equivalent of 300-2000 handheld with with one lens (estimated 16" X 4.5" diameter and 4 or 5 pounds) and a 2X teleconverter. How much weight and size does it take for Nikon or Canon to get out to 2000 in a zoom? And will it be handholdable? Sorry, sometimes size and weight gain one very little.


You are forgetting the "macho man" signalling that is so important so some males. To them, their gigantic hands that are too big for a small camera or a camera and lens too light weight for "stability", are synonyms for their testosterone levels!
Go to
Oct 17, 2019 12:05:05   #
asaya wrote:
Probably funding just don't want to spend that level of money to buy a Mirrorless at this point


Fuji XT-20 599 699 with kit lens
Nikon 5600 499 body only
Price is pretty comparable
For size, weight and ease of use, Fuji beats the 5600.
Go to
Oct 17, 2019 11:48:29   #
srt101fan wrote:
Cat, you seem to be perpetuating a misconception about the Nikon 5xxx series. I have a 5300. You don't have to go into the menus to change the common shooting settings. You can do that from the screen.


I know. No misconception! The screen is a menu! Even worse than a menu, in fact! After using the Fuji, I found the 5500 impossible to contend with. With Fuji, I keep my eye on the subject in the viewfinder, twiddle one dial or the other without looking, and voila!..... the changes are made and I am looking at exactly what the camera will record!
Go to
Oct 17, 2019 10:08:13   #
gvarner wrote:
It seems that lots of folks like to quibble over the difference in weight, in a few ounces here and there, between this lens and that in an effort to lighten their load. It’s a matter of dedication, I guess. I see a lot of wildlife pros lugging very heavy video gear or DSLR's with cannon sized telephotos across the landscape. Quality gear should be the priority, not an insignificant difference in weight. I give a concession to those who have a physical constraint but that’s it. In a sense, heavier gear has a higher inertia, requiring more energy to make it move or even vibrate. I like the heft of my D7200 when I hoist it up and anchor it to my face.
It seems that lots of folks like to quibble over t... (show quote)


I find the "best" camera is the one you end up grabbing the most often. It is a tool. And it doesn't matter how wonderful the tool is if it mostly stays at home while you are out using another. Your "best" camera and "greatest" lens don't take any pictures on the shelf.
Go to
Oct 17, 2019 09:52:17   #
asaya wrote:
I own a D300 and a D800E considering moving to a smaller/lighter DX camera like a D5600. I Don't believe I am ready for a mirrorless camera Anyone own a D5500/D5600 that could share there performance with me


What would make you "not ready" for a mirrorless camera? They are easier to use than a 5500. And an XT-30 (Fuji) weighs only about 12 ounces. I gave away my 5500. I found it was frustrating to use because changing settings involved menus.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 292 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.