Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: bjprovo
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 next>>
Mar 31, 2014 15:39:37   #
Gene, I, like ALMOST all of the people on this blog, consider myself a lifelong learner. If my statement is incorrect, please feel free to explain to me how and where I went wrong. To simply make statements like this make me feel as if I am in a discussion with my mother-in-law. I am always willing to learn and grow.
Gene51 wrote:
Steve, I always find it amusing to watch "experts" with most, but not all of the information necessary try to defend incorrect statements. I suspect most are dilletantes anyway. Amusing just the same. :)
Go to
Mar 30, 2014 15:37:09   #
I crop any how so that was no big deal. I really haven't had many opportunities as I just got the camera. The full frame pictures are just outstanding though.
Dexter56 wrote:
"After much researching and anguishing", that's funny. That is exactly where I am. And like you, any type of D3 or D4 is out of the question. I think I am with you though, the overriding factor is the high ISO. Have you been happy with your choice? Do you feel like you are missing the extra "reach" that you had with your D300? Since I pretty much crop all of my shots to isolate the action, I feel as though instead of cropping in the camera, I will just be doing it in PP.
Go to
Mar 30, 2014 13:56:01   #
I had the same issue as you, I shoot high school with a D300 and wanted to move forward. After much researching and anguishing I decided to go with the D610. The higher ISO is probably the overriding factor. I know many sports photographers will tell you that fps is big, but I can't afford any form of the D4 so that ends that issue. I was taught that if you shot 7fps at 1/500 of a second than you have captured 7/500 of a second and missed out on 493/500 of that second. I try to anticipate and choose my moments and I have become good at it but there is a huge learning curve.
Dexter56 wrote:
Hello everyone. I have been following this site for quite a while, but this is my first posting. I am hoping to get some advice from someone that has both a D600/610 and a D7100. I currently own a D200 and it has been a great camera for me. Love the layout and the feel of the semi-pro body. As long as I do not have to push the ISO too high, it performs great. My main interest in photography is high school sports. The D200 works great as long as there is plenty of light, but for night games under the lousy stadium lights, or inside a gym I am only good up to about ISO 800 before things get too grainy and too much loss of detail. So the question is, a D7100 or D610? Advantages of 7100; better focus system, more reach, slightly faster FPS and of course price. Advantages of 600, better high ISO image quality, which is very important. All my lenses are FX, including my main sports lens, the old but trusty 80-200 AF-S 2.8 By the way, I only shoot sports in JPEG so the buffer is not an issue, and I do crop most of my photos in PP. Thanks for any advice you can give me.
Hello everyone. I have been following this site f... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 30, 2014 13:44:52   #
I'm not real familiar with your camera but I shoot with a D300. When shooting indoors at schools (which I do a lot) I have found that the best help to my photos is setting the white balance manually and not leaving it on auto.
Jbcjoy wrote:
I take a lot of photos indoors at school events. Sometimes its tungsten lighting, sometimes a darkened room with a lit stage. I have a Nikon D80 and have also used a Nikon compact digital camera. Nothing gives very good results. Any advice? Thank you very much.
Go to
Mar 24, 2014 16:16:23   #
Try this link and watch with your camera in hand.
http://www.nikonusa.com/en/Learn-And-Explore/Product-Tutorials/index.page

Linda Art wrote:
I just received back my lens from Nikkon which was repaired it is an AF-2 DX NIKKOR 18-55 F/3.5-5.6G VR, and because I havent used the camera all that much, and want to get real closeups of wildlife, ice, (yes we still have it here) and a few action shot, everytime I want to get a close-up the closer I get the more I turn the lens, the more blurry it gets, I cant seem to get anyclose ups at all with it, even with an zoom which i suppose it does by turning the lens (Im very new to this) and it gets frustrating because yes it takes very nice scenes far away, and could only get to a certain point, then the blur comes in, and cant get real close ups, I do have another lens that came with the D3000, which I rarely use, AF-S NIKKOR 55-200mm 1:4-5.6 G ED, but that one seems to be blurry no matter what i want to take pictures of, and its probably me, because I'm still not sure about any of this on this camera. Is it possible that you need a special lens for real close-ups? or can it be done on photoshop? I'm a bit confused, I have pics that are closeups from before, but from another camera, and they were awesome...or maybe I'm just not using the lens right, need help with this, I'm still a rookie with this camera, and hope the lens was repaired right...Thanks again from all you professionals out there...Linda :-)
I just received back my lens from Nikkon which was... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 22, 2014 11:03:50   #
In my experience (shooting high school sports) the toughest thing about baseball is anticipating where the action will take place. Before each pitch you should give some thought as to what possibilities may occur and what you are after such as baserunners, fielders, batters, pitchers and catchers. And try not to do what I do and become a fan watching the action instead of photographing the action. Good luck and enjoy the tournament.
DavidPine wrote:
I have a D7100 and I normally like to use my 70-200 f2.8 lens. I have back button focus set on AFC (9) points. I will be shooting in bright sun light. SS I plan to use is about 400. I plan to use a variety of f stops 2.8 - 11. ISO will vary. I need advise on lens options. I have a Nikon 105g f2.8 Macro that I love, an 18-200 f3.5 VR, 50 1.8 and a 35 f1.8. I don't want to use just the 70-200 (even though I love it). I like to shoot action but I also like to get candid gallery shots. I want to take 3 lenses as this is a 2 day tournament with almost 90 teams. I have a monopod and a tripod but I think I am only going to take my monopod (opinion on that as well please).
I have a D7100 and I normally like to use my 70-20... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 17, 2014 10:21:03   #
Depending on how soon you are going there have been a large number of sightings of bald eagles along the Connecticut River near Long Island Sound.
jaycohen13 wrote:
If you had a free day to shoot anywhere within a 2 1/2 hour radius of new York city, where would you go?
Go to
Mar 14, 2014 10:26:38   #
Every one seems to want the best of both worlds. Hands on experiences and solid advice, but extremely low prices. I have made it a point to shop and buy local, even if it costs a few extra dollars. I find the interactions and the solid advice worth far more than buying online. But alas, I fear that I am considered a dinosaur by many.
MT Shooter wrote:
Calumets filters were the only brass mount filters I was aware of besides B+W, good quality glass too.
The ONLY thing that will keep local camera stores open is if the customers frequent them and actually spend their money there. Way too many people still shop the locals to gets a "hands-on", and them go to the internet to buy. It pretty much killed the industry already.
Go to
Mar 13, 2014 10:59:43   #
More than once my wife has looked at me and shook her head. Once again I had become a spectator instead of a photographer. I really like what you are doing with these photos.
DEC wrote:
Timing is everything in sports action. I have missed so many good shots because I was so into the play instead of focusing.
Go to
Mar 10, 2014 10:15:02   #
I use football receiver gloves found at most sporting goods stores. They are thin enough to feel the controls, keep my hands warm, and have different levels of stickiness to keep the camera from slipping around while I am using them.
dpaulham wrote:
while shooting..amy suggestions...
Go to
Mar 6, 2014 10:38:38   #
I now get Outdoor Photographer and Digital Photography electronically. When I find an article that interests and/or teaches me I copy and paste it into Word and have created a nice electronic library of articles that are always available to me without having to go searching for and through magazines.
jerryc41 wrote:
Every so often a member asks what photography magazines we read. I've been getting Popular Photography and Outdoor Photographer for years, partly because I can get them for $12 or less for a year.

I realized, though, that I have piles of them sitting upstairs, waiting for someone to read them. When a new one arrives, I'll skim through it, and add it to the pile. I seldom get back to read the articles. I find it interesting seeing what new products are being introduced, but these magazines don't seem to have any real value for me. Of course, if I took the time to go through the technical articles conscientiously, I would probably get something out of them, but I seldom do that.

Am I the only one who stacks these with the thought of reading them later?
Every so often a member asks what photography maga... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 5, 2014 11:07:15   #
I am not sure how these sites work, but I can share some possible information about posting pictures of student athletes on line. I take pictures at the high school I teach at and have been told that I can not post them to any photo site unless I have confirmed that all students involved have releases signed by their parents. It opens the door to legal ramifications if pictures are posted (especially of minors) without proper consent from all.
O_S_O_K wrote:
I know, I know, this topic has been hashed and re-hashed. I did do a search and I read most of the previous postings. I still have a couple of specific questions for you guys.

I have been asked by my Daughter's Lacrosse team to take pics and choose a photo sharing site so parents can view the photos. I will also be doing this for my Son's Lacrosse team as well.

They have asked me to use one of the following sites:
Shutterfly, Photobucket or Flickr

So my question is this. Is one of these better than the other for this type of sharing? What would be the best way to go about setting this up? Do I use a personal e-mail and password and set up folders for each, or should I use a team account instead with a team email and password? Why is one better than the other? Does each option allow me different controls, such as: only allowing for viewing and/or for use?

Never used one of these sites before so you input is valued. Thanks for your time!
I know, I know, this topic has been hashed and re-... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 3, 2014 16:59:36   #
I want to thank everyone for their input. It really helps to get different points of view and their reasoning. I really appreciate it.
bjprovo wrote:
I am about to take the plunge into FF. I have been looking at the Nikon 2.8 24-70, and in my research found out that this lens was introduced in 2007. Does anyone have an idea about how often Nikon releases a newer version of its lenses? Thanks for your input.
Go to
Mar 3, 2014 10:21:08   #
I have two 3 TB external drives that I store pictures on. One is kept at work so if my house should burn down or be involved in some other disaster, the pictures are still safe in another location.
Merlino18 wrote:
I have a ton of pictures on my computer. How can I get them off? They are on the Nikon software, Photoshop Elements 12 Organizer, and even I Photo. My MAC is running strangely. I need to get them off the computer. I have Dropbox, and someone said to put them on CDs or on flash drives. When you put them in Dropbox, can you delete them from your computer. Don't want to lose anything.
Go to
Mar 2, 2014 08:48:40   #
abc1234 wrote:
I like the analysis and accept it on face value. Ametha must be a physicist, mathematician or engineer. However, I am a biochemist so would add response time to Ametha's calculations. I would imagine that to be at least 200 msec. I understand his recommendation for a single shot but I wonder if that would work for a casual shooter.

Ametha, thanks for your post.


If you shoot at 1/500 and take six shots in a second think about what you have missed, 494/500 of that second. I found in shooting sports that quite often you get better results by anticipating the "best" moment. Takes practice and forethought and is challenging, but is makes for better results.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.