Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
Posts for: SusanFromVermont
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 142 next>>
Dec 26, 2018 13:56:54   #
amfoto1 wrote:
FYI:

Cokin changed ownership within the last year or two. They still make the resin filter line, but Cokin also introduced a high-end NUANCES line of filters recently.

Cokin NUANCES are Schott glass and multi-coated... but are fairly pricey.

Depending upon size, NUANCES are available in 2-stop, 5-stop, 8-stop and 10-stop ND.

NUANCES 84mm (Cokin P size) 10-stop ND is $99. The same in 100x100 size (4", Cokin Z-Pro) costs $199. And the same in 130x130 (Cokin X-Pro size) costs $330.

Of course, those prices are for the filter only. A filter holder and adapter are normally needed to use them, adding approx. $125 to the above cost (varies a bit by sizes req'd).

I'll stick with my round, screw-in B+W (equal quality, lower price, and a whole lot easier to carry around and use than the rectangular/square filters).
FYI: br br Cokin changed ownership within the la... (show quote)

It is actually very easy to use the rectangular Grad ND filters hand-held. It takes some practice to remember to have it covering the whole lens, but not too much practice! I have the holders and never use them - quicker to hold it up when I want to use it and put it away when I don't. I use Singh Ray Grad ND and B+W screw-on filters.
Go to
Dec 26, 2018 13:36:09   #
rbmitch123 wrote:
Every time I exit LR I backup my work on my iMac hard drive (as opposed to’skip this time’). I just realized that each backup is not overriding the last back up and I have 56 gb of backups. I need space on my hard drive.
Do I need to manually need to delete all the backups except the most recent, or is there a setting to do this automatically?
Also, I am backing my LR to an external hard drive about once a month. That means the hard drive backup is redundant except for most recent work.
Second question, how should I address my workflow relative to the back up?
Every time I exit LR I backup my work on my iMac h... (show quote)

I put my LR Catalog backups into a folder for each month. At the end of a month I delete the oldest one, keeping 1 month's LR backups and making a new folder for the current month.

Backing up your images is also an important thing to do. But one backup is not enough - it is not a matter of IF an external HD will fail, but of WHEN. I went for years without a problem, but then one of my external HDs failed. Without another backup, I would have been very anxious until a new one arrived and I got my images backed up again. The images are irreplaceable.

If you take a lot of photos over the course of a month, and do a lot of editing, you should consider backing up the images more often. I assume you do it manually, which can be hard to remember and a pain to do. Another way to do it is to let a computer service do it for you. There are lots of them, and have been mentioned on a number of threads you could find on UHH. I use Synchback [2brightsparks.com] which lets me set a schedule for backups. I can also choose what type of backup, the time of day, and whether to do it twice from the computer onto different HDs, or to have the second external HD backed up from the first. Mostly I use Mirror, which will reflect any changes you made on your computer, including deleting anything you have deleted. I also have one backup that is the regular type which does not change anything, just incrementally records whatever has been added or changed. That is a "fail-safe" in case I want to find something I had deleted earlier. Synchback has a free level and paid levels to choose from.

Not sure why you think backing up should affect your workflow. Normal workflow is transferring images to the computer/LR Catalog, editing, etc. If you elaborate on what you mean, it would help to answer that question.
Go to
Dec 26, 2018 12:03:52   #
tomcat wrote:
Arrrrgggghhhhhh!!! Too many buttons on these cameras.........

A few weeks back I posted a problem that I was having with my fumbling and bumbling fingers moving the switches on my Nikon 70-200mm lens during the course of shooting action shots at a gym competition. I frequently moved the lens barrel settings from A/M to M, turned off the VR, and anything else I could hit with my fingers. A couple of you mentioned rubber bands and I got a pack of these Pro Slip-on Grips wide rubber bands from B&H and they work like a charm. After I slipped the blue one around the lens settings, no more accidental changes. Hooray---that problem was solved.....

Now I have another problem, again with fingers that stray. After shooting so many sessions with my D3s, I went back to my D750 for some indoor party and Christmas sessions. I can't tell you how many times I have hit the Bracket button or the Flash button accidentally. I can tell that the bracketing is on because I start getting images that have incorrect exposures, some shutter delays, etc all due to the bracketing getting turned on. When I shoot, I am constantly turning my camera from horizontal to vertical and my hands and fingers wander all over the camera body as I capture continuous action and subject movements---I don't have time to look at the camera LCD screens to verify settings before each shot; otherwise that fleeting moment has passed. Because I shoot in manual, sometimes I find that my shutter speed setting has moved also---sigh...... I am ready to get a tube of super glue and fix this problem. With all of this automation and buttons everywhere, why can't the manufacturers put a disable function in the menus so that you can disable some of these buttons? I especially would like to turn off or remove the bracket function.

Vent vent vent.....
Arrrrgggghhhhhh!!! Too many buttons on these cam... (show quote)

I agree with ElNikkor and Kozan - practice when not under pressure to get the shot. I have two cameras with differences from each other. If I have not used one of them for a while, I have to stir up the memory banks to make sure I remember those differences. Both the brain and the body have "memory" that can be trained.

There are various ways to approach this. But the common theme is to get comfortable with each camera separately first, then practice switching between them. No need for speed when you first start, just get used to remembering those differences when switching. Once you begin to feel more comfortable, you will be able to do it faster.

Just get used to each camera to the point where you can operate one or both more efficiently when at an actual event. You won't feel as much pressure and anxiety over missing shots.
Go to
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
Dec 26, 2018 11:51:54   #
tomcat wrote:
My eyes are still pretty good so I don't have any trouble reading the menus. That is a great idea about reassigning a function to the bracketing button or turning it off. I will check that out later this morning when the rest of the house is awake......currently I'm the only one awake at 0500

Thanks for the suggestion.

Look in the camera manual, too. Ought to have more information than the menus in the camera.
Go to
Dec 26, 2018 11:09:38   #
kybob wrote:
I have the graded Cokin Z-Pro set of ND filters, I am planning our bi-annual trip to Hawaii and want to do more creative shots with the water so have been looking at ‘full’ ND filters to give the water that dreamy look. I have several questions; how are the Cokin ND filters? Cokin are signifantly less than the Lee filters is it worth the bucks? The Lees ND filters ie the big stopper and little stopper have a foam gasket around the edges to seal out the light, I notice the Cokin do not seem to have this, is this foam an important feature or gimic? . Am better off getting the Lee filters and paying the bucks for a new system? ( $610 for new Lee system or $102 for 3 Conkin ND set)

Yes I know one is plastic / resin and the other glass. ( lighter to carry and heavier to carry)
I have the graded Cokin Z-Pro set of ND filters, I... (show quote)

I like B+W filters for screw-on. Is there a reason why you prefer an ND filter over a circular polarizer filter? Both cut down the amount of light that gets in, the CPL changes the angle of the light and reduces reflections, with the side benefit of making colors richer.

For Grad ND polarizers, I use the rectangular, glass filters from Singh Ray. Hand-held to make switching from on to off much faster.
Go to
Dec 26, 2018 11:01:12   #
junglejim1949 wrote:
I was looking at the New Canon 70-200 II IS USM.
Photo Store in Maine quotes reg price $2,499 but available at $1,419 plus free shipping. Is this another too good to be true?

I agree with all those who said to RUN!

Keep in mind that manufacturers like Canon and Nikon dictate sales prices to the vendors. They have very little wiggle room on what they can charge. Sales prices are also orchestrated by the manufacturer, which is why you will see vendors like B&H adding "bonus" goodies to the package as a way to give an added "discount"!

At the price the store is quoting, you are probably being offered a "gray market" camera. Any warranty is not honored in this country. The store's dishonest practices may very well affect you when you try to get service for the camera, or if for some reason you want to return it! Beware of Trojan Horses...

Not having a camera store near me [I live in southwestern Vermont], I shop mostly at B&H and Adorama, both located in New York City. Prices are good, their honest practices are well known, merchandise is as they represent it, and delivery is fairly rapid compared to others in far-off states. [Delivery for me is usually 2-3 days.]
Go to
Dec 26, 2018 10:39:40   #
orchid1 wrote:
I am disappointed with my shots. Wondering what I am doing wrong. I am using Nikon D90 in manual mode and most of my shots are overexposed. The meter is always on 0 (in the middle) which in my mind should be the perfect exposure. Wondering if it is an issue with the camera or the operator. Any help would be appreciated.

You have gotten a lot of good suggestions, so I won't add too much. Just a couple of things.

First, I use manual most of the time, and have found that my Nikon camera will often take a better photo when slightly under-exposed [according to the light meter]. As others have pointed out, you need to pay close attention to the "golden triangle" of settings - ISO, aperture, and shutter speed. Understanding how changing one affects the others is a key element to getting good images.

Referring to your LCD review of the image can be very useful for working out how to make it better. If the light is good, start with ISO 100, and as the light decreases, raise the ISO. If you need a fast shutter speed, depending on the light, you may want to increase both ISO and aperture size. Just realize that larger aperture decreases depth of field. Go out and take "test shots" with different settings and light conditions. That ought to give you a good idea of how to respond when a good photographic opportunity appears - and thus have less chance of not having the right settings!

One thing you did not mention was whether you are doing any post-processing. It is amazing how much of an image may still be "in there" when over-exposed. Any time an image is taken and goes to pure white or pure black, the details are gone. But anything in between carries the possibility of a decent retrieval. Might have more noise than desirable, but you will still have your image. Give it a try!
Go to
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Dec 25, 2018 20:46:19   #
GrandmaG wrote:
Yes, I love Lightroom for its flexibility, too. I can tell my two cameras apart because of the extension...arw (Sony) or nef (Nikon). I like including the event and the date in the renaming process. It's just more information that is built in when I do a search for certain pictures.

Hope you are having a good Holiday Season! It has been quiet and peaceful for us, a little snow on the ground making everything look pretty. I am looking forward to getting out and about with my camera, although days like today are a bit too cold. It only got up to about 20 degrees.

Susan
Go to
Dec 25, 2018 11:42:02   #
GrandmaG wrote:
I can see keeping the numbers if you keep your photos on the cards. That way, the reference is the same. I used to do that. When I had several editing software options, i would add a word at the end so I would know which software I did the edits in, i.e.: CAG12345_PSE. Now I reformat my cards once I have backed up my images in at least three places. I should use more keywords than I do; but I am mostly interested in who is in the picture, so I make sure face recognition is current with every import. Likewise, I have tried many variations to my import system and, in fact, have about 4 import presets for different scenarios.

BTW, I have NEVER wished I still had the numbers!
I can see keeping the numbers if you keep your pho... (show quote)

Nice thing about LR is it is so flexible! No matter what system a person prefers, it can handle it.

I do not keep the images on the cards, they get reformatted. Instead I use several external hard drives for backups. The camera puts the numbers on, and when the numbers start over, I change the prefix so as not to have duplicate file names! Also, I have 2 cameras, so the prefix also indicates which one took that photo! As for face recognition, I have never tried that. Usually don't take too many photos of people and use keywords for them if I don't think I will remember who they are! I keep my keywords fairly basic to keep it simple.


Go to
Dec 25, 2018 11:26:59   #
Gene51 wrote:
Ouch!

My 24-70 was also in the bag, as was my D700, and Sigma 150 F2.8 macro. Surprisingly the camera just melted, but the three lenses were ok. I never even bothered to send the macro in - I just cleaned it up and have been using it for the past 6 yrs without issue. My insurance company covered everything.

If I had as much valuable gear as you do, I would have insurance too. You never know when something will go wrong!

Just bought the Nikon 200-500mm and a new camera bag to carry both cameras and all 4 lenses [pre-owned Think Tank Airport International v.2 from eBay], so the value of my gear does increase every year.

We have a white Christmas here! Not a lot of snow, but much prettier than the bare grass!

Susan
Go to
Dec 24, 2018 20:29:56   #
Gene51 wrote:
I had one that was in a car fire in 2012, liberated from the trunk of a Volvo sedan after being rear-ended while waiting at a traffic light. The firemen put the fire out, squirted foam and other nasty chemicals on everything in the trunk, took out the camera bag which had the lens in it, dropped it, then the lens fell out when the fireman picked it up, then he tossed everything on the grassy shoulder.

I cleaned it up, sent it to Nikon, which replaced the front and rear elements and a bunch of internal stuff, the focus and zoom ring, and the rear barrel and lens mount ($400) and now I have a lens that is better than new.
I had one that was in a car fire in 2012, liberate... (show quote)

Hi Gene,

A very unfortunate series of events! Glad the lens could be repaired/refurbished.

I had a fall with my D810 and 24-70 where I slid down a slope head first and ended up at the edge of a rocky little stream. Camera, lens and I got muddy. But my gear was more fortunate and, besides needing cleaning up, and a ding on the L-bracket, were fine. I got a cut on my head from a rock, but used the towel on the camera first...

Happy Holidays, and Best Wishes for the New Year!
Susan
Go to
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Dec 24, 2018 15:24:15   #
GrandmaG wrote:
That plan works, too. I do understand WHY people create the folder first in order to know where their photos are kept. I just find it easier to let LR do it, although I have moved pictures to other folders or created new folders and moved pictures into them as you describe. As long as this is always done in Lightroom, Lightroom can find the pictures and these changes appear on the hard drive (or wherever you store the pictures).

I really like that when I do it this way, I can have Lightroom rename the pictures on import to something more meaningful and unique, rather than keeping the numbering system generated by the camera.
That plan works, too. I do understand WHY people ... (show quote)

I've tried re-naming but then wished later I still had the numbers. Now all I do is add words like "HDR" [with numbers of contributing photos], "Macro", and numbers to indicate different stages or versions of an image. For me, my filing system keep things organized so I can find them, and keywords help when I want to group together a certain type of image from multiple files such as "Winter", "Fall Colors", "Horses" and/or "Saratoga".

It is kind of interesting to see how others manage their images. I have changed how I do it several times, finally now have a system that is a keeper!
Go to
Dec 24, 2018 13:34:42   #
martinfisherphoto wrote:
A wide angle lens is probably the most difficult lens to use properly. Many are bought and then shelved for that reason. You need to fill the frame, front to back to make the photo interesting. Just using for a landscape lens the photos look empty and the landscapes far away. Check out my page here https://500px.com/martinfisher for wide angle shots. All the landscape were taken with the Tokina 11-16mm either on a DX Nikon camera or a full frame camera set at 16mm to prevent vignetting. I Just purchased the 14-24, Used but never used for a little more than half price, and plan to use now on the full frame camera to replace the Tokina.
A wide angle lens is probably the most difficult l... (show quote)

Great photos! I see what you mean about filling the frame front to back. Buying pre-owned is something I had in mind, saves a lot of money if the right price is available from a trustworthy source. Did you feel the need for a filter? I can imagine not needing one all that much. I have CPLs for my lenses, but don't use them all that frequently. Best for very bright days and for toning down reflections. I like shooting on days that are slightly overcast or at dawn or dusk.

I like your fuzzy spiders!

Susan
Go to
Dec 24, 2018 11:28:05   #
GrandmaG wrote:
I see that most everyone imports their pictures into a folder on their computer and then ADDS them to Lightroom. Also, most use an external card reader instead of the cord from the camera.

I also use a card reader or the SD slot on the computer BUT, I import directly into Lightroom.

This is how it works for me. When I insert the card, import automatically opens. I choose COPY (so the originals stay on the card), scroll down to the bottom, uncheck all, then pick the pictures that I want to import (click-shift-click) and put a check mark in one and all selected will also have a check mark.

Then I check the options in the right hand column. I import them into dated folders, rename the pictures (I made a preset for date, time, custom) where I can type the event into the custom box, and add keywords that apply to ALL pictures. Then I double check the destination to be sure they are going where I want. Click import and Lightroom does all the work. You only have to set this up once, then just name it as an import preset. Next time, you just have to change the custom name for your selected pictures.

I let Lightroom build 1:1 previews on import. After the pictures are imported, I rename the folder to add the event (making sure you don’t delete the date LR created), so the folder looks like this: 2018-12-25_183020_Christmas.

I made a preset yyyy-mm-dd_hrminsec_custom for naming my pictures.

It sounds more complicated than what others suggested but once you have the presets made it’s quite easy.
I see that most everyone imports their pictures in... (show quote)

In my opinion people import into a folder rather than directly into LR because they do not trust that method to get their images into the correct locations in the folders on their hard drive. Doing the direct import is efficient and actually saves time [which incidentally makes it less complicated!].

I do it a bit differently than you - the images get imported without a designated destination. They are instead located in the "previously imported" category. I then highlight ones for a particular folder. If the folder is already there, I drag and drop them into it. If I need to create a new folder for them, I create it in the desired location and make sure the checkbox is checked for moving those images to the folder at the same time. LR creates that same folder on my hard drive and the images are automatically put into that folder. I also add keywords for those images before moving them.
Go to
Dec 24, 2018 10:01:01   #
gfox333 wrote:
Looking for an answer to a question that I am sure has been answered a thousand times here. I recently purchased a new Dell laptop with Microsoft 10 operating system trying to find the best way to transfer my pictures from my DSLR to my computer. In the past I have used an older system was Windows 7 using Nikon transfer with a d200 Nikon. I know it's a very old system and camera but it served me well. the camera remains the same but looking for the best way to upload my files I do have Photoshop CC and Lightroom CC on my new laptop Suggestions???
Looking for an answer to a question that I am sure... (show quote)

I agree with the card reader suggestions. You can buy a simple one [one or two slots for the card[s] you use. Or you can buy a larger one if using it for a card not available on the simple one. Safer, efficient, less likely to fail.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 142 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.